Geographyinitiative (talk | contribs) →Kinmen Bridge: new section |
|||
Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
Why did you do [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Islamic_music_albums_by_Iranian_artists&diff=0&oldid=695141020 this]? ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 01:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC) |
Why did you do [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Islamic_music_albums_by_Iranian_artists&diff=0&oldid=695141020 this]? ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 01:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Looks like replacing a template redirect with the current name of the template. As I mentioned above, it would have been nice to have an edit summary. Please provide one with every edit in order to help your fellow editors understand your reasoning. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 03:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC) |
:Looks like replacing a template redirect with the current name of the template. As I mentioned above, it would have been nice to have an edit summary. Please provide one with every edit in order to help your fellow editors understand your reasoning. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 03:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC) |
||
::My apology for that. From now on I will try to always put an edit summary on every change that I've made. [[User:Chongkian|Chongkian]] ([[User talk:Chongkian#top|talk]]) 00:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Kinmen Bridge]] == |
== [[Kinmen Bridge]] == |
Revision as of 00:41, 11 May 2020
Hello sir, I am a University student who is currently pursuing his undergraduate degree in a state University. I was trying my best to talk to you for the last 2 weeks about a very important thing. Let me come to the point sir I am very much into preventing plastics from entering the ocean since my teenages..because i knew how important it is! Recently i came across this "Plastic Pollution" article in the Wikipedia and i was highly disappointed of one data! It is, The article included the countries who are top global ocean plastic polluters and my country srilanka has listed on 5th position!! This is was very shocking for me!! And i researched further about it. After researching more about it i found out that the information is FALSE!! as if we do the real calculation srilanka will be ended up on 22nd position in global polluters list.. I think this is a real serious issue on the article! One of srilankan researcher has done the real calculation and further clarification behind this misinformation and written a very informative report about this.he submitted the report to the "Science" who is responsible for that false data. But they never cared about his research and never corrected it and still let the false data to be there! I can provide the research report which is justifying the fact that srilanka cannot be in the 5th position.. Sir, i am working with 3 International eco saving groups and i am Sharing behalf of all those environmentalists.. If you consider this and make the change it will inspire and motivate and give a great confidence to the environmentalists like me... Please kindly consider this sir. I saw that you have edited the article two weeks ago...and i am putting this message today (5th of may 2020) please kindly consider about this misleading information on the article sir. Thank you so much for your attention sir.
Welcome!
|
Nomination of Dabie Mountain Regional Medical Centre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dabie Mountain Regional Medical Centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabie Mountain Regional Medical Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Da Vinci Nanjing (talk) 15:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello
Hi hope you're well! Did you run out of Taiwan articles LOL? Or enjoying a well deserved break haha! :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Lol, I have created 1,667 articles about Taiwan since 2012 out of the current 9,724 articles in WikiProject Taiwan (excluding category & list-related pages/articles), that is about 17% already, hehe. I have to say those tourism-related articles (museums, galleries, parks, shopping malls, forests etc) is almost reaching its saturation point already (of course there are still 1 or 2 new ones after every 2-3 months). Even I have written quite a lot of Wikiquote articles about people of Taiwan. What can still be continuously written currently are those politicians (new ministers, MP (member of legislative yuan)), yet those politicians can only be written after some period of time (e.g. which generally keeps changing after every 4 years after the general and local elections). So what I'm currently focusing on doing now is to clean up & streamline their WikiProject categorization & evaluation (class & importance) in their talk page, their infobox information, their category page, their commons category page and also their Wikidata page, to make sure all of the available data is fully written, tally and linked with each other. This is currently the bigger things that I am doing and that can be done until some foreseeable future. And no, there is no such thing as a break for me in Wikipedia ~ :P Once you are already inside it, there is no such thing as a "way out" of this, haha Chongkian (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi
Adding commons cat, like you here, or here, is really not necessary, as the commons cats are already linked. (Look on the left side of the page, under "In other projects"), cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, yes while I do know there is link there at the left side of the page, then why where is that 'commonscat' / 'commons category' command at the first place in wikipedia? besides, there are so many other wikipedia articles which has that commonscat inside their article body content. i mean, i will just follow the rule of wikipedia writing if there is one, or if there has been any consensus on that. Chongkian (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Question
Just curious, why did you add a welcome notice to my talk page? I have been contributing to WP articles since 2012. Regards, Ijon Tichy (talk) 19:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry maybe I have missed that out since there is no conversation (old or now, nor any archive) in your talk page. Chongkian (talk) 00:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
in the old days
Indonesian project tried to keep anything to do with schools out on notability grounds, and also the decided disinterest in every school in Indonesia being listed - in all likelihood there are fewer than 20 schools primary or secondary that might reach strict standards of notability - for the whole country.. But things creep in, there are some bizarre lists of names of regencies and localities that counter the school argument, but nevertheless there is no longer a cohort of project oriented editors who keep up with things that creep in. Not sure what you have been up to - but felt i needed to point that out before I have a look at what has been going on. JarrahTree 09:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- If you see my edits on the schools, it is mostly on the Wikipedia category pages, not on any new Wikipedia article written. Even the school categorization, I follow what has been written already in any other existing country (e.g. United States, in which every single little thing (which is soo much not notable and so trivial) got fully written without any AfD challenge, so basically I'm not doing anything new here. I'm just focusing on the school-related categorization "equality", just like when people do "gender equality" article writing in Wikipedia. I don't see any difference here. For the question of notability, I am 100% sure it is always about the newly written Wikipedia article itself, it has almost nothing to do with Wikipedia categorization pages. Besides, I need to create that high school category in order to "combine" and "consolidate" between the school itself and its alumni. Is there any better idea on how to connect school and its alumni if it is not using category page? And I believe everything must always have its newly start first in which at the beginning it may look trivial (and not notable at all), but actually it gives a solid ground and "infrastructure" for other people to further populate that category in the longer run. And also upon the creation of such categories, I didn't see any deletion notification of such categories before, thus I assume such categories have never been created before (and never been challenged also). I've seen also differences in notability about Indonesia between (id.wikipedia and en.wikipedia). Indonesia in id.wikipedia has sooo many articles about schools or mosques written, yet in its equivalent en.wikipedia, there is virtually very few in comparison. Same with anything about Malaysia between ms.wikipedia and en.wikipedia, the content is way so much different in terms of its notability content and the quality also, e.g. in ms.wikipedia, there are "thousands" of mosque articles until the very small and tiny ones, yet they are not found in its equivalent en.wikipedia. So probably we need to address this long-due "gap" as well as what I can see. Chongkian (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- now three edit conflicts, and lengthy replies lost - will try to get back later, pointless during edit conflicts... JarrahTree 09:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deforestation in Angola, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Moxico and Cabinda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello there. In this edit, you seem not only to have delinked Wiktionary, but also added an incorrect pronunciation [1]. I would like to request, editor to editor, that if you have a moment, please restore the links to Wiktionary and provide a correct pronunciation. If you are philosophically opposed to doing it, let me know and I will do it myself. Geographyinitiative (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Years in Spain by autonomous cities
A tag has been placed on Category:Years in Spain by autonomous cities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Miquelon Airport
Hi, I've edited your edit on the article on Miquelon Airport with a hopefully more neutral phrase and links. Please take a look and see if it makes sense or needs more editing (or removal). Here's the diff between our edits:
Thanks,
Lent (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
You appear to be making many Infobox talk pages worse
Why are you doing edits like this (removed |class=
parameters and one WikiProject template) and this (removed class and importance parameters) and this (removed WikiProject banner shell template and a relevant template)? Is there a consensus discussion that justifies removing these useful parameters? – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Jonesey95
- Previously, I have always try to keep the class of the WikiProject I am editing (e.g. "{ { Wiki Project ABC|class=template|importance=NA } }. But I was prompted by other users (I forgot which user, but I will let you know once I've found his/her conversation with me), that for non-article grading (e.g. stub, start, C, B, A, GA etc) such as project, category or template-class, we can safely remove the class rating and that particular WikiProject will automatically include itself with those particular class (project-class, category-class or template-class) and when you search in that particular WikiProject page, it indeed listed already inside its listing. So this is kind of "size-saving" or "streamlining" way of writing WikiProject classification. Chongkian (talk) 06:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Please use edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi again Jonesey95
- Generally I always write the edit summary if I edit an article content. But if I'm editing the infrastructure or maintenance related pages (or standardization of page's categorizations), then somehow it is a so many redundancy to write edit summary for a very small changes (one small change but being redo/reapplied to other tens of other articles) yet applied again & again to many other pages. Maybe you know some way of 'copying' the same edit summary to many other articles at the same time so that I dont have to write it again and again for a very small change (yet still considered more than just a 'minor edit' of typo for example). Chongkian (talk) 06:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Category talk pages
Hi, I notice you've been creating a lot of category talk pages. If you're doing that for specific wikiprojects that you know are interested in having their categories tagged, then that's great. But otherwise, creating category talk pages has little benefit, and some noticeable, if small harm. For instance, if the a talk page doesn't exist its tab on the category page will be red and this makes it a lot easier to notice if a category has something relevant on its talk page – like a discussion or old CfD tags – because then that link would be blue. – Uanfala (talk) 01:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Scope of WikiProject Wikipedia
Chongkian, thank you for placing WikiProject banners. Please note however, that not every category with the word "Wikipedia" in the name is in the scope of WP:WikiProject Wikipedia. The scope os described at the top of the WikiProject's page:
- Scope
- The Outline of Wikipedia and everything listed in it.
- Articles on subjects directly related to Wikipedia.
- Articles on each edition of Wikipedia.
- Articles on Wikipedians who are notable for being involved with Wikipedia.
- Other Wikipedia-related articles, especially in Category:Wikipedia or its subcategories.
Please don't add the banner of WikiProject Wikipedia to pages out of scope. Thanks. —andrybak (talk) 08:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Removing WikiProject banners
You have twice removed WikProject NBA from Template talk:Infobox basketball final without any explanation. [2][3] The project uses the template, and you are not a member of the project. If you are not familiar with the basketball domain, I suggest that you ask for input in the future for any similar edits. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 08:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) is being given away in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, including one week dedicated to South-South East Asia, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. There's a potential £120 to be won in total for destubbing on any subject or region of your choice. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 11:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Measuring tool
You can check the length of your entries using this tool before submitting here. The article readable prose, excluding sources and lists should be a minimum 1200 bytes (1.2 KB) and ideally 1500 bytes (1.5 KB).
What would make it easier on this is if everybody programs their common.js in their preferences to contain:
importScript('User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js'); // User:Dr pda/prosesize
Instructions:
- Go into your preferences, click on the "Appearances" tab
- Where it says "Shared CSS/JavaScript for all skins:", click "custom javascript
- Paste the command given above into that and save.
- Now approach an article and look in the tools section on the left. You should see "Page size". Click that for each article and you'll quickly get a reading without having to paste text all of the time and look externally.
- Look out for where it says, for example: "Prose size (text only): 1310 B (xxx words) "readable prose size" ". That's what we're looking for on this, that has to read over 1200 B when finished.
† Encyclopædius 15:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Removing Redirects
I noticed that you removed the redirects from Module talk:Sports table/WL OT and Module talk:Sports table/WDL. However, you did not give a reason for removing these redirects that were put in place five years ago to consolidate all discussion at Module talk:Sports table. I have reverted your removals. If you feel these redirects should be removed, please bring it up for discussion there. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 22:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
A Dobos torte for you!
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
photos in australia
there is a certain level of cynicism arising when seeing photos requested - something as a simple check on commons is worth doing before adding the tag
, and there is always the potential that wiki editors are unlikelt to have have ventured... JarrahTree 12:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- hmm, let me go through it one by one again more carefully. usually I do try to look out for the images, and those who have images, i also remove the photo request template in the talk page. but yeah, probably i might have missed out 1 or 2 of them. Chongkian (talk) 13:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
I am intrigued as well as to why caves assessment is being removed ? Ahh I just remembered it is a project that is for whatever bizarre reason it is an unassessed project... :) apologies I had forgotten
No big deal about photo request, you never know... JarrahTree 13:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, that WikiProject Cave is without any class or importance rating, so it's better to keep it as short as possible for any non-applicable data. these are the things (sometimes) some of the (hopefully) unaware users becomes a bit 'hostile' to me, thinking that i start to vandalize things around, hehe. but in reality, it is all about standardization & streamlining whenever applicable (or such as removing defunct wikiproject or moving a particular inactive wikiproject as a task force of any existing wikiproject - it does involve quite a lot of work just to monitor all of those things & to get things updated & at the right place), and it is hard to keep writing that very minor change in the edit summary in which u need to type one whole sentence for a single word deletion, lol. cheers (especially for whatever we do during this virus lockdown period) .. Chongkian (talk) 14:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Arthur Huang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Taiwanese
- Miniwiz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Taiwanese
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Confusing edit
Why did you do this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like replacing a template redirect with the current name of the template. As I mentioned above, it would have been nice to have an edit summary. Please provide one with every edit in order to help your fellow editors understand your reasoning. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey- I found a picture of Kinmen Bridge on Flickr, and there may be more- check it out if you are interested. You know more about this topic than me. Geographyinitiative (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)