No edit summary |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Edit warring at Palestinian people: new section |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::My apologies. Can it stand now that over 24 hours have passed? [[User:Chicago Style (without pants)|Chicago Style (without pants)]] ([[User talk:Chicago Style (without pants)#top|talk]]) 16:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
::My apologies. Can it stand now that over 24 hours have passed? [[User:Chicago Style (without pants)|Chicago Style (without pants)]] ([[User talk:Chicago Style (without pants)#top|talk]]) 16:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::I suggest that you revert yourself.Or you may be blocked.--[[user:Shrike|Shrike]] ([[User talk:Shrike|talk]])/[[WP:RX]] 16:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
:::I suggest that you revert yourself.Or you may be blocked.--[[user:Shrike|Shrike]] ([[User talk:Shrike|talk]])/[[WP:RX]] 16:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Edit warring at [[Palestinian people]] == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Palestinian people]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The complete report of this case is at [[WP:AN3# User:Chicago Style (without pants) reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: 48h)]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 23:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
| image = yes |
|||
| The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the [[Arab-Israeli conflict]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page. |
|||
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> |
|||
| valign = center |
|||
| [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|35px|alt=|link=]] |
|||
}} –[[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 23:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:39, 14 January 2013
A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Chicago Style (without pants). I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 17:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know that Palestinian people, like all articles about the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed, is subject to a one-revert restriction (1RR). That means an editor may make no more than one reversion during any 24-hour period. For more information about revert restrictions, please see WP:3RR. For information about the sanctions that apply to Arab–Israeli articles, see WP:ARBPIA#Further remedies. Please also note the large warning at the top of Talk:Palestinian people.
I noticed that you just broke the 1RR rule on Palestinian people. Please undo your latest edit or you may be blocked for your violation. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please see WP:ANEW#User:Chicago Style (without pants) reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: ) — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 06:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- My apologies. Can it stand now that over 24 hours have passed? Chicago Style (without pants) (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Edit warring at Palestinian people
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3# User:Chicago Style (without pants) reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: 48h). EdJohnston (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
–EdJohnston (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC)