EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Your appeal at WP:AE: new section |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Your appeal at WP:AE: Fix my comment |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
Posts should not be [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=770826245 removed from AE] except by administrators. Please wait for this appeal to be closed. Since your block has expired, you could reply at AE and ask for it to be closed, if you want. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 20:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC) |
Posts should not be [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=770826245 removed from AE] except by administrators. Please wait for this appeal to be closed. Since your block has expired, you could reply at AE and ask for it to be closed, if you want. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 20:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
:Your appeal of the 48-hour enforcement block has been declined, per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=771465805&oldid=771461674 the AE discussion]. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 18:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:19, 21 March 2017
Welcome!
|
Sources
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Mark Bellhorn, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia's definition of notable alumni
When adding notable people to Wikipedia (like this), know that the commonly accepted definition of notability on Wikipedia is that they have a Wikipedia article written about them. It can be done without linking to another article, but that means the full notability guideline must be followed- in other words, by giving citations to reliable sources to satisfy WP:N. tedder (talk) 15:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michael Jackson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 14:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Matlack
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball#Standard infobox. We are trying to determine what is and isn't notable enough for the infobox, so feel free to take part in the discussion.--Yankees10 02:53, 7 August 2012 (UTC) That was useful and notable. He had a National League pennant, twice led the NL in shutouts, and led the American League in walks per 9 innings. All are notable statistics or achievements. -Capriaf
Only triple crown stats go in the infobox. So please stop adding it over and over and over.--Yankees10 21:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC) Shutouts leader has its own page, so you can stop deleting it. Several players have it included in their box. --Capriaf
October 2012
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Paul Ryan, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. v/r - TP 15:31, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
All-American honors
Hi, Capriaf. I would like to respectfully request that you cease deleting college All-America honors from NFL player infoboxes. First-team All-America honors, especially unanimous and consensus honors are far more significant than anything other than national championships and Super Bowl rings. They belong. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:30, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to José Offerman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:32, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
LeBron James
You've been a long-time editor, so just a reminder that edit warring is not allowed, and can lead to editors being blocked, especially with the three-revert rule. Please discuss your concerns at the ongoing discussion at Talk:LeBron_James#Opinions_from_Bleacher_Report in lieu of repeated addition of the same basic text. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 01:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jon Matlack may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * 2× [[List of Major League Baseball shutout champions|NL shutouts champion]] (1974, 1976
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Damon
Again, read [1]. We do not add non-triple crown stats such as triples to the infobox. Stolen bases and saves are the exception.--Yankees10 23:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Your recent editing history at Johnny Damon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Michael Greiner 00:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Reference errors on 7 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Ronald Reagan page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you made a change to an article, George Zimmerman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. General Ization Talk 18:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to George Zimmerman. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. General Ization Talk 19:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Capriaf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
March 2017
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 01:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
Your appeal at WP:AE
Posts should not be removed from AE except by administrators. Please wait for this appeal to be closed. Since your block has expired, you could reply at AE and ask for it to be closed, if you want. EdJohnston (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Your appeal of the 48-hour enforcement block has been declined, per the AE discussion. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)