MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 3d) to User talk:CBM/Archive 16. |
→Access to u_enwp10: new section |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:According to [[User:PeerReviewBot/Logs/Archive#Peer_review_archiving_log_for_Jul_12|the log]], the article is on FAC. Peer reviews are closed when the article goes to FAC to avoid duplication of effort. In this case, I think the issue is that the FAC was never completely closed. You need to ask someone in the FA group to fix that, and then you can re-open the peer review after they confirm the FAC is closed, and the peer review bot will leave it open. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 12:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
:According to [[User:PeerReviewBot/Logs/Archive#Peer_review_archiving_log_for_Jul_12|the log]], the article is on FAC. Peer reviews are closed when the article goes to FAC to avoid duplication of effort. In this case, I think the issue is that the FAC was never completely closed. You need to ask someone in the FA group to fix that, and then you can re-open the peer review after they confirm the FAC is closed, and the peer review bot will leave it open. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 12:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Ahhh, weird. OK I'll see what I can do. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 13:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
::Ahhh, weird. OK I'll see what I can do. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 13:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Access to u_enwp10 == |
|||
Hi CBM, |
|||
I was working on a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Database_reports&oldid=439335421#WikiProjects_by_size database request] that involved outputting all the Projects, and corresponding article counts tracked by ~enwp10. Would it be possible to give me (read only) access to the <code>u_enwp10</code> database on the toolserver? It appears that I was using an outdated database when I responded to the request. [[User:Tim1357|<font color="Blue" face="Arial" >Tim]]</font><font color="Red" face="Optima" >[[Special:Contributions/Tim1357|1357]]</font> <sup><font face="Times new roman" size = 2 >[[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]</font></sup> 14:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:P.S. An alternative would be for you to handle the request yourself. Whichever you'd like. {{=)}} [[User:Tim1357|<font color="Blue" face="Arial" >Tim]]</font><font color="Red" face="Optima" >[[Special:Contributions/Tim1357|1357]]</font> <sup><font face="Times new roman" size = 2 >[[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]</font></sup> 14:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:34, 14 July 2011
Attempted to create this, but I guess I don't know how to do it properly. How can I run the bot to start this page properly? CycloneGU (talk) 17:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. The bot would have done it automatically on the next full update, as well. — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I wanted to do it today because South Sudan gained its independence today (I'm in Canada and working on this, I must be dedicated *LOL*). I think doing another manual bot run in a day or two might be good as well, since there is a lot of category shifting going on right now and the numbers will be out of whack in mere hours after the first run. I think after another run in a couple of days we can let automatic updates take over. CycloneGU (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Can we do one more manual run today? A lot of categories have moved around in the last 48 hours, so it should put some better data into the table. After this, I think automatic updates will work. A manual update of "Sudan" might be handy as well since a lot of pages came from that category. CycloneGU (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- The automatic updates have been running every day (they ran on the 10th). I did a manual update just now but I don't think much had changed since yesterday's run. — Carl (CBM · talk) 14:10, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, the list didn't seem before to update since two days ago, so that's odd. It's updated now. Strange that the C, B, etc. articles haven't traversed over yet; I wonder if I should have set up the table as a subsection of the Africa project. Does it look to be set up correctly?
- Thanks BTW! CycloneGU (talk) 18:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- The assessment categories needed to be in Category:South Sudan articles by quality. I fixed that and updated the table. — Carl (CBM · talk) 18:32, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Much better. This was my first time trying to set up something like this (no one else had started doing it *LOL*), and I figured I missed something. Thanks for taking care of that, I'll head back to the project and comment on the talk page about the table. =) CycloneGU (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Trinidad and Tobago Wikipedians' notice board/Style guide has been marked as a guideline
Wikipedia:Trinidad and Tobago Wikipedians' notice board/Style guide ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has recently been edited to mark it as a guideline. This is an automated notice of the change (more information). -- VeblenBot (talk) 02:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Am I misreading this?
Can anyone tell me what happened here? Why was the review closed? Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- According to the log, the article is on FAC. Peer reviews are closed when the article goes to FAC to avoid duplication of effort. In this case, I think the issue is that the FAC was never completely closed. You need to ask someone in the FA group to fix that, and then you can re-open the peer review after they confirm the FAC is closed, and the peer review bot will leave it open. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ahhh, weird. OK I'll see what I can do. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Access to u_enwp10
Hi CBM,
I was working on a database request that involved outputting all the Projects, and corresponding article counts tracked by ~enwp10. Would it be possible to give me (read only) access to the u_enwp10
database on the toolserver? It appears that I was using an outdated database when I responded to the request. Tim1357 talk 14:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)