→You are now a Reviewer: new section |
TonyTheTiger (talk | contribs) →1998 National League Wild Card tie-breaker game GA: new section |
||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 01:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC) |
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 01:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
== 1998 National League Wild Card tie-breaker game GA == |
|||
On behalf of [[WP:CHICAGO]], thanks {{User Good Article|1998 National League Wild Card tie-breaker game}}--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 13:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:40, 17 July 2010
Archives
|
Happy BuickCenturyDriver's Day!
User:BuickCenturyDriver has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pixelatique
A tag has been placed on Pixelatique requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Prezbo (talk) 08:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pixelatique redirects to Filip Salindrija. I created an AFD discussion for that article. –BuickCenturyDriver 08:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Article deleted. (See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filip Salindrija) –BuickCenturyDriver 22:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Templates for deletion nomination of Template:IPsock
Template:IPsock has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 02:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- A consensus was established to keep this template active. –BuickCenturyDriver 01:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Your edit
Could you please explain why you removed my comment [1]? --Folantin (talk) 09:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Wrong rollback link was clicked but this is resolved. –BuickCenturyDriver 09:10, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:New Yankee Stadium.JPG
File:New Yankee Stadium.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:New Yankee Stadium.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:New Yankee Stadium.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi BuickCenturyDriver - we already had an article on this film at The Princess and the Frog, to which I've converted The Princess And The Frog (NB capitalization) into a redirect. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PricelessMemories.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PricelessMemories.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
RfA thanks
(blah blah • I did it!) 06:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Wiki Greek Basketball's RFA
Hi there. Your neutral !vote at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wiki Greek Basketball was based on NOTNOW. Just to let you know that the editor in question has over 30000 edits since Feb 2008. Thought I would mention this in case you wanted to review your !vote. Thanks. GedUK 13:18, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- I've posted a reponse, though the RFA is now closed. –BuickCenturyDriver 07:32, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:JimJoyce.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JimJoyce.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 09:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Quotes in articles
Please review Wikipedia:Quotations#When not to use quotations and read the edit summary I used. An entire section devoted to quotes is strongly discouraged. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 05:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Wrong move
Hi there. Your move of the Victoria ezike was uncalled for. What prompted you to do that? The article is a candidate for A7-speedy deletion (unremarkable person), and is not to be moved into the article creator's user space. You might want to revert that move yourself. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 10:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:JasonBayMets2010.JPG
A tag has been placed on File:JasonBayMets2010.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.
If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NatureBoyMD (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:JimJoyce.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JimJoyce.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Belated RfA news
Thank you for your RfA nomination back in July 2009, which I was not then in a position to accept. I am writing to let you know that I am finally going to transclude my RfA, today. Your original nomination was too outdated to use any longer (I've saved a copy of it at User:SMcCandlish/RfA draft), because it took so long for me to be in a position to actually have the time to do admin duties. Using newer nominations is not meant as any kind of slight to you. :-) You are welcome to re-add one if you like, but there are already two, so that is probably overkill. Just wanted to let you know, since you'd gone out of your way last July. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 19:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Closing RfAs
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Osarius is clearly not a WP:NOTNOW case. I have undone your closure of it. Please do not close an RfA of an established user unless you gain their consent or pass WP:RFB. Thank you, NW (Talk) 03:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Additionally, if you do close an RfA (per WP:NOTNOW), it is generally considered polite to let the candidate know that you closed it, closed it early, and why you closed it. Thanks, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 03:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I did let them know, check my contributions. –BuickCenturyDriver 03:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't see that; if you check the timestamps I posted this at nearly the same time you notified. I'm glad you did that, thanks. But as NW said, closing expired adminship candidacies is generally left to a bureaucrat except in an obvious WP:NOTNOW case (which wouldn't be an expired case). But thanks for your initiative! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 03:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I did let them know, check my contributions. –BuickCenturyDriver 03:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: Final fantasy 7 is better than 6
Hello BuickCenturyDriver. I am just letting you know that I deleted Final fantasy 7 is better than 6, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. The WordsmithCommunicate 05:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
The information deleted from the Bow and Bromley page is election boxes with no information on the results added. They should remain off the page until someone has the data to hand to add. 88.211.192.151 (talk) 13:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JasonBayMets2010.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:JasonBayMets2010.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
- If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to somewhere on your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Tiebreaker
Template:Tiebreaker has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank spam!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TFOWR 21:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. MBisanz talk 01:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
1998 National League Wild Card tie-breaker game GA
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, thanks
This user helped promote 1998 National League Wild Card tie-breaker game to good article status. |
--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)