Common style, replaced: → ==Stylization of the "common name"== In January 2013 there was a "RfC on COMMONSTYLE proposal" at WT:AT in which yo using AWB |
→Mustang: new section |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
In January 2013 there was a "[[Wikipedia talk:Article titles/Archive 40#RfC on COMMONSTYLE proposal|RfC on COMMONSTYLE proposal]]" at [[WT:AT]] in which you expressed an interest. FYI there is a similar debate taking place at the moment, see [[Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Stylization of the "common name"]] -- [[User:PBS-AWB|PBS-AWB]] ([[User talk:PBS-AWB|talk]]) 12:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC) |
In January 2013 there was a "[[Wikipedia talk:Article titles/Archive 40#RfC on COMMONSTYLE proposal|RfC on COMMONSTYLE proposal]]" at [[WT:AT]] in which you expressed an interest. FYI there is a similar debate taking place at the moment, see [[Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Stylization of the "common name"]] -- [[User:PBS-AWB|PBS-AWB]] ([[User talk:PBS-AWB|talk]]) 12:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Mustang == |
|||
B2C, on various issues over the years, sometimes we have been in agreement on issues and sometimes in disagreement. Per my most recent post at the Mustang dab discussion, "bullshit" is not AGF nor an appropriate way to discuss the situation. There is enough drama at that board without me going to ANI over your personal attacks, which are unneeded. Reasonable minds can disagree. They don't have to start swearing at people. I would hope you understand the issue here. We have a [[Shetland pony]], which within the pony world is commonly called a "Shetland", likewise, within the horse world, we have "Mustangs" "Arabians" "Hanoverians" and so on. Outside of the horse world, any rational person will clarify an "[[Arabian horse]]" or a "[[Hanoverian horse]]" so as to be clear where we are talking about a horse or not. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 02:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:32, 23 January 2015
Coherent reply policyIf I put a message on your talk page, I will be watching that page for a reply. If you leave a message here, I will reply here, unless you request otherwise. |
---|
|
||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
RFC
Hello you commented on Solar Roadways. I wanted to let you know about a Request for Comment that is going on right now:
RfC: Should the cost to cover the entire USA be included?
We welcome your comments. Thank you. Wholesomegood (talk) 04:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC
Stylization of the "common name"
In January 2013 there was a "RfC on COMMONSTYLE proposal" at WT:AT in which you expressed an interest. FYI there is a similar debate taking place at the moment, see Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Stylization of the "common name" -- PBS-AWB (talk) 12:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Mustang
B2C, on various issues over the years, sometimes we have been in agreement on issues and sometimes in disagreement. Per my most recent post at the Mustang dab discussion, "bullshit" is not AGF nor an appropriate way to discuss the situation. There is enough drama at that board without me going to ANI over your personal attacks, which are unneeded. Reasonable minds can disagree. They don't have to start swearing at people. I would hope you understand the issue here. We have a Shetland pony, which within the pony world is commonly called a "Shetland", likewise, within the horse world, we have "Mustangs" "Arabians" "Hanoverians" and so on. Outside of the horse world, any rational person will clarify an "Arabian horse" or a "Hanoverian horse" so as to be clear where we are talking about a horse or not. Montanabw(talk) 02:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)