Captain Occam (talk | contribs) |
Black Kite (talk | contribs) →AN3: rp |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
::If there ends up being more edit warring even after the page protection expires, should I file another AN3 report about it, or should I just contact you directly? I’d prefer the latter, if that’s an acceptable option. --[[User:Captain Occam|Captain Occam]] ([[User talk:Captain Occam|talk]]) 00:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC) |
::If there ends up being more edit warring even after the page protection expires, should I file another AN3 report about it, or should I just contact you directly? I’d prefer the latter, if that’s an acceptable option. --[[User:Captain Occam|Captain Occam]] ([[User talk:Captain Occam|talk]]) 00:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
::: Both would probably be better, in case I'm offline - in fact, I will be on a short holiday when the protection expires. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 05:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:58, 26 May 2010
thank you
You did the right thing keeping those two articles about the oldest veterans, your very patriotic and respectful unlike some people who take it for granted and act like it doesnt even matter. 65.0.48.189 (talk) 23:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
I would say this, but a nicely judged close and always good to see closers include rationale. And humour. Thank you. --Dweller (talk) 10:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
AN3
Could you please take a look at my reply in my AN3 thread about Mathsci? You closed the thread while I was in the process of typing a reply, and it looks like you may have based your decision on something Mathsci was saying there which was false. All four of my original diffs linked there were reverts; the fourth one was deleting three paragraphs from the article for the second time, reverting my adding it back after the first time he’d removed it. It seems very unfortunate that your decision there would have been the result of a false claim from Mathsci, and the fact that I replied to it six minutes too late. --Captain Occam (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Even if the answer is that your decision can’t be changed, I would still appreciate you getting back to me about this. As linked to in my report, I now count six reverts in 24 hours, and only the sixth of them was of material that’s clearly unhelpful. --Captain Occam (talk) 20:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I missed one there which you added after the report. I've now done what I should've done in the first place - fully protected the article for a week. No doubt it's in the Wrong VersionTM but it's time the sparring took place on the talk page instead of the article history. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Even though this wasn’t the solution I had in mind, I guess it’s still helpful, so thanks.
- If there ends up being more edit warring even after the page protection expires, should I file another AN3 report about it, or should I just contact you directly? I’d prefer the latter, if that’s an acceptable option. --Captain Occam (talk) 00:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Both would probably be better, in case I'm offline - in fact, I will be on a short holiday when the protection expires. Black Kite (t) (c) 05:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- If there ends up being more edit warring even after the page protection expires, should I file another AN3 report about it, or should I just contact you directly? I’d prefer the latter, if that’s an acceptable option. --Captain Occam (talk) 00:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)