Brewcrewer (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
although you're probably not going to respond, just like you ignored the above threads, prior to a [[wp:drv]], the closing admin is supposed to be asked to reconsider. so this is the official request: please reconsider your close that was against a clear consensus. Thank you and have a good day.--''[[User:Brewcrewer|<span style="font family:Arial;color:green">brew</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brewcrewer|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#2E82F4">crewer</span>]] [[User talk:Brewcrewer|(yada, yada)]]'' 22:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC) |
although you're probably not going to respond, just like you ignored the above threads, prior to a [[wp:drv]], the closing admin is supposed to be asked to reconsider. so this is the official request: please reconsider your close that was against a clear consensus. Thank you and have a good day.--''[[User:Brewcrewer|<span style="font family:Arial;color:green">brew</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brewcrewer|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#2E82F4">crewer</span>]] [[User talk:Brewcrewer|(yada, yada)]]'' 22:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
I am wondering how you could close the debate when the majority was clearly leaning towards the opposite desicion? What is the point of a debate if one person can decide the issue based on his/her POV? Do we have any redress to your decsion?[[User:BorisG|BorisG]] ([[User talk:BorisG|talk]]) 15:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:19, 13 March 2010
I'm pretty much retired from enwiki, as it's pretty clear that it's irretrievably broken. I do visit occasionally (usually to fix non-free image abuse, clear out the AfD closings that no-one else wants to do, or patrol newpages) but if you've got an important question about something I've done in the past, you're better off using the email link. (And even then, don't hold your breath!). Thanks.
2007:01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08
2008:09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19
2009:20-21-22-23-24-25-26-27-28
2010:29
Messages below please
Deletion review for John Kiriakou
An editor has asked for a deletion review of John Kiriakou. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
I wrote, in my Drv request, that since you are semi-retired, I didn't trouble you before going to DRV. Geo Swan (talk) 03:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Jewish peoplehood AFD
Howdy, Would you mind explaining your rational for closing this AFD as you did? I'd like to understand your thinking on this as I am considering taking it to deletion review. Thank you, Joe407 (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Numbering
Hi BK. I've just done this [1] which I assume was inline with what you intended? If not my apologies. Pedro : Chat 20:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
although you're probably not going to respond, just like you ignored the above threads, prior to a wp:drv, the closing admin is supposed to be asked to reconsider. so this is the official request: please reconsider your close that was against a clear consensus. Thank you and have a good day.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
I am wondering how you could close the debate when the majority was clearly leaning towards the opposite desicion? What is the point of a debate if one person can decide the issue based on his/her POV? Do we have any redress to your decsion?BorisG (talk) 15:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)