CSDWarnBot (talk | contribs) m Regarding Andrew and Martin |
Malcolmxl5 (talk | contribs) Hello. Have a look at Wikipedia's policies. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Speedy deletion of [[:BlaBlaBlogMovies]]== |
==Speedy deletion of [[:BlaBlaBlogMovies]]== |
||
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:BlaBlaBlogMovies]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]], as well as our subject-specific [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|notability guideline for biographies]]. |
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:BlaBlaBlogMovies]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]], as well as our subject-specific [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|notability guideline for biographies]]. |
||
Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
==Notability of [[:Andrew and Martin]]== |
==Notability of [[:Andrew and Martin]]== |
||
[[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Andrew and Martin]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Andrew and Martin]] is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|our criteria for speedy deletion]], particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|notability guidelines for websites]]. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.<br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Andrew and Martin]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Andrew and Martin}} here]''' [[User:CSDWarnBot|CSDWarnBot]] ([[User talk:CSDWarnBot|talk]]) 02:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Andrew and Martin]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Andrew and Martin]] is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|our criteria for speedy deletion]], particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|notability guidelines for websites]]. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.<br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Andrew and Martin]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Andrew and Martin}} here]''' [[User:CSDWarnBot|CSDWarnBot]] ([[User talk:CSDWarnBot|talk]]) 02:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Andrew and Martin== |
|||
Hello, thanks for your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMalcolmxl5&diff=242840969&oldid=242811582 message]. The thing to remember that Wikipedia isn't a record of everything that ever existed, it is an encyclopedia that records ''notable'' subjects that are verifiable. In the context of Wikipedia, this means the content must be verifiable in reliable third-party publications. Have a look at Wikipedia's policies on [[WP:V|verifiability]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and also [[WP:N|notability]] and [[WP:WEB|notability of web content]]. In a nutshell, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable, third-party, published sources that are independent of the subject, then it's most likely to be acceptable for Wikipedia. Note that youtube isn't considered a reliable source. Kind regards, --[[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 22:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:28, 3 October 2008
Speedy deletion of BlaBlaBlogMovies
A tag has been placed on BlaBlaBlogMovies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. JoeTalkWork 01:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with BlaBlaBlogMovies. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. HalJor (talk) 23:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of BlaBlaBlogMovies
A tag has been placed on BlaBlaBlogMovies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. HalJor (talk) 01:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Andrew and Martin
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Andrew and Martin, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Andrew and Martin is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Andrew and Martin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Andrew and Martin
Hello, thanks for your message. The thing to remember that Wikipedia isn't a record of everything that ever existed, it is an encyclopedia that records notable subjects that are verifiable. In the context of Wikipedia, this means the content must be verifiable in reliable third-party publications. Have a look at Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, reliable sources and also notability and notability of web content. In a nutshell, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable, third-party, published sources that are independent of the subject, then it's most likely to be acceptable for Wikipedia. Note that youtube isn't considered a reliable source. Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)