No edit summary |
re inserted page blank |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
Please revert wat you have done. I was only trying to improve the article, and I think it was better. You deleted supported edits I made. [[User:Dukered|Dukered]] 02:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
Please revert wat you have done. I was only trying to improve the article, and I think it was better. You deleted supported edits I made. [[User:Dukered|Dukered]] 02:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Three revert rule warning == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Dominican Republic|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Dominican Republic]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
|||
[[User:Flor Silvestre|Flor Silvestre]] 20:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Hello == |
|||
You're making serious mistakes in your persistent chain of edits in the Dominican Republic article: |
|||
1. When you put back your own version without checking my edits thoroughly, you're keeping the grammar errors I've corrected. Grammar is a pivotal aspect here on WP. |
|||
2. There's a photograph of Juan Pablo Duarte which happens to be redundant here. There's an article about him with that photo, an the DR entry already has a photo with the three Founding Fathers. |
|||
3. In the Economy section, there's no need for ''two'' photos of Santo Domingo. In the first photo you keep writing '''"Economic and vertical growth of Santo Domingo"''' as a footnote. Does that image really illustrate that? |
|||
4. The image of the statue of Duarte can go perfectly to his article. It does nothing in the '''Music''' section. |
|||
5. I put a photograph of Juan Marichal in the sports section, and more information, which improved the section. You deleted it. Why? |
|||
And so on. I'm open to [[consensus]], but please, behave according to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility Wikipedia's policy on civility], or I'll have you reported for disrupting conduct. '''[[User:Dukered|Dukered]] 02:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)''' |
Revision as of 03:59, 23 October 2007
Hello, BigGabriel555, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards 13:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Imagen:Parque Colon.JPG
A tag has been placed on Imagen:Parque Colon.JPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g2.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 15:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Fleonel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fleonel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Leonel Fernández
I am noticing you are a bit confused; we have a freely licensed photo of the President already, we cannot accept the one you are wishing to use. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 21:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Leonel Fernández article
I noticed you have been working on the Leonel Fernández article. In case you don't know, let me point out that Wikipedia doesn't allow nonfree photographs of living people to be used to identify those people. Only free images are acceptable for that purpose. This is why the nonfree photographs you added were removed. Please do not add additional nonfree images to the article. If you have questions about this, please feel free to ask me; you can reply immediately below this comment and I will notice it. — Carl (CBM · talk) 21:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Columbus Park.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Columbus Park.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Columbus Park.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Columbus Park.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
What is your reason for removing the photo i placed in?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=159834685&oldid=159708964 UnclePaco 06:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Warning
This is the first warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dominican Republic here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=prev&oldid=160314999 , you will be blocked from editing. UnclePaco 17:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
This is the second warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dominican Republic here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=160525921&oldid=160502343 , you will be blocked from editing. UnclePaco 23:59, 26 September 2007
This is the third warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dominican Republic here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=160806698&oldid=160740291 , you will be blocked from editing. UnclePaco 07:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dominican Republic here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=prev&oldid=160866369 , you will be blocked from editing. UnclePaco 05:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Warning
Thank you for experimenting with Dominican Republic on Wikipedia as you did with this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=160806698&oldid=160740291. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. UnclePaco 06:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Warning
Thank you for experimenting with Dominican Republic on}} Wikipedia Wikipedia{{#if:| as you did with this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=160525921&oldid=160502343 . Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Stop your silly edits in the Dominican Republic article
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dukered 05:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Last Warning
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
Please revert wat you have done. I was only trying to improve the article, and I think it was better. You deleted supported edits I made. Dukered 02:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Three revert rule warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dominican Republic. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Flor Silvestre 20:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello
You're making serious mistakes in your persistent chain of edits in the Dominican Republic article:
1. When you put back your own version without checking my edits thoroughly, you're keeping the grammar errors I've corrected. Grammar is a pivotal aspect here on WP.
2. There's a photograph of Juan Pablo Duarte which happens to be redundant here. There's an article about him with that photo, an the DR entry already has a photo with the three Founding Fathers.
3. In the Economy section, there's no need for two photos of Santo Domingo. In the first photo you keep writing "Economic and vertical growth of Santo Domingo" as a footnote. Does that image really illustrate that?
4. The image of the statue of Duarte can go perfectly to his article. It does nothing in the Music section.
5. I put a photograph of Juan Marichal in the sports section, and more information, which improved the section. You deleted it. Why?
And so on. I'm open to consensus, but please, behave according to Wikipedia's policy on civility, or I'll have you reported for disrupting conduct. Dukered 02:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)