Beyond My Ken (talk | contribs) →Christopher Reeve talk page: Get off my talk page and stay off |
Beyond My Ken (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
G'day BMK, just watch the 3RR at Christopher Reeve. Cheers, [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
G'day BMK, just watch the 3RR at Christopher Reeve. Cheers, [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks, I appreciate the note - my back goes up when I'm confronted by people who know nothing, and use their ignorance to degrade our articles. [[User:Beyond My Ken|BMK]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 23:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:58, 26 February 2016
Articles that look like shit and need to be fixed
I am translating the article into Spanish. Would you care to add more information to the article about the slenderness ratio of the building and also the liquid tuned mass damper it incorporates to mitigate movements from lateral winds. Source: CTBUH.org I must say you've done a fine jov with the article (although some links appear to be broken). Doblecaña (talk) 12:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll takea look at that source later today when I have more time. BMK (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
The Night Porter - Genre(s)
Thanks for your recent edits - I'm glad we've cleared that up. PatTheMoron (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Crowdsourced stuff
I had your "a horse, crowdsourced" in mind when I made this edit. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Possible Collaboration
I have been working on expanding the article to David E. Durston's infamous exploitation Horror film I Drink Your Blood. I have been looking for someone to help me expand this article for a while now an I was wondering if you would be willing to collaborate with me on this. If so please let me know.--Paleface Jack (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Flatiron
I think you should consider to nominate it to Good Status! It is a great article! Cheers! Doblecaña (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but my preference is to stay away from Good Article Reviews. My observation is that the contributions of the reviewers are generally detrimental to the article. BMK (talk) 04:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
So you're right and the rest of the Wikipedia community is wrong eh? What gives you that idea? Why should your opinion prevail against guidelines laid down after discussion? If you have proof that she officially changed her name then produce it. Otherwise read WP:MOSBIO#Pseudonyms, stage names and common names. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- No, not the "rest of the Wikipedia community", just whatever idiots wrote that section of MOSBIO. Please do not respond, I'm not interested in the opinions of editors who cannot think for themselves and do what's best for our readers, instead following MOS robotically, as if it was Holy Writ. BMK (talk) 12:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Edit-warring at Christopher Reeve
G'day BMK, just watch the 3RR at Christopher Reeve. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)