Betacommand (talk | contribs) |
Carabinieri (talk | contribs) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Hi, your bot is tagging numerous talk pages, which are not about religion, with {{tl|WPReligion}}. Some examples: [[Matthias Küntzel]], [[Simon Wiesenthal Center]], [[Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service]]. I know I've told you this before, but please be more careful when operating your bot. I'm not willing to revert all of your errors this time.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 18:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
Hi, your bot is tagging numerous talk pages, which are not about religion, with {{tl|WPReligion}}. Some examples: [[Matthias Küntzel]], [[Simon Wiesenthal Center]], [[Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service]]. I know I've told you this before, but please be more careful when operating your bot. I'm not willing to revert all of your errors this time.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 18:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
:it was tagged because it was in [[:Category:Antisemitism]] per [[WP:BOTREQ#Bot tagging request]] [[User talk:Betacommand|β<sup><sub>command</sub></sup>]] 18:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
:it was tagged because it was in [[:Category:Antisemitism]] per [[WP:BOTREQ#Bot tagging request]] [[User talk:Betacommand|β<sup><sub>command</sub></sup>]] 18:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Antisemitism is usually not related to religion, therefore that tagging was wrong.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 18:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::I am astonished. You were told by 2 editors that your bot was tagging pages it shouldn't, yet you continued to run it at 18:52 UTC. Don't you get that not all articles in the categories you're tagging deserve to be tagged?--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 19:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Need to follow up on what you are tagging== |
==Need to follow up on what you are tagging== |
||
Today you made this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Regeneration_%28Doctor_Who%29&curid=7222830&diff=192851906&oldid=188014838]. This areticle has nothing whatsoever to do with religion. In fact it is about the long running British sci-fi show. How many other articles will wind up with this tag is unknown but if a human does not followup on these many articles will have been tagged needlessly. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 18:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
Today you made this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Regeneration_%28Doctor_Who%29&curid=7222830&diff=192851906&oldid=188014838]. This areticle has nothing whatsoever to do with religion. In fact it is about the long running British sci-fi show. How many other articles will wind up with this tag is unknown but if a human does not followup on these many articles will have been tagged needlessly. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 18:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
:then your article shouldnt be in [[:Category:Reincarnation]] [[User talk:Betacommand|β<sup><sub>command</sub></sup>]] 18:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
:then your article shouldnt be in [[:Category:Reincarnation]] [[User talk:Betacommand|β<sup><sub>command</sub></sup>]] 18:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
::It isn't my article it is wikipedia's article. Your bot is needlessly tagging many articles based solely on the categories they are in. The category may be correct that does not automatically put it within the scope of a given project and your currect program does not allow for this fact. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 18:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Another odd tag == |
|||
I'm not sure [[Lillibullero]] ought to be in the religion WP either. [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] 19:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:04, 20 February 2008
If you are here to register a complaint regarding this bot's edits, before doing so please note:
|
Where have the open discussions gone?
Where have the open discussions gone? (They don't appear to have been placed in the archives.) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh. For some reason, they've been move here: User talk:Betacommand. (I wonder why?) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- More than likely, it's easier to keep discussion in one place. SQLQuery me! 17:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Error
Hi, your bot is tagging numerous talk pages, which are not about religion, with {{WPReligion}}. Some examples: Matthias Küntzel, Simon Wiesenthal Center, Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service. I know I've told you this before, but please be more careful when operating your bot. I'm not willing to revert all of your errors this time.--Carabinieri (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- it was tagged because it was in Category:Antisemitism per WP:BOTREQ#Bot tagging request βcommand 18:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Antisemitism is usually not related to religion, therefore that tagging was wrong.--Carabinieri (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I am astonished. You were told by 2 editors that your bot was tagging pages it shouldn't, yet you continued to run it at 18:52 UTC. Don't you get that not all articles in the categories you're tagging deserve to be tagged?--Carabinieri (talk) 19:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Antisemitism is usually not related to religion, therefore that tagging was wrong.--Carabinieri (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Need to follow up on what you are tagging
Today you made this edit [1]. This areticle has nothing whatsoever to do with religion. In fact it is about the long running British sci-fi show. How many other articles will wind up with this tag is unknown but if a human does not followup on these many articles will have been tagged needlessly. MarnetteD | Talk 18:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- then your article shouldnt be in Category:Reincarnation βcommand 18:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- It isn't my article it is wikipedia's article. Your bot is needlessly tagging many articles based solely on the categories they are in. The category may be correct that does not automatically put it within the scope of a given project and your currect program does not allow for this fact. MarnetteD | Talk 18:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Another odd tag
I'm not sure Lillibullero ought to be in the religion WP either. Coemgenus 19:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)