Yulia Romero (talk | contribs) →Invitation: Thanks |
Yulia Romero (talk | contribs) →Ukraine/Russia/Gas: thanks for your time! |
||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
==Ukraine/Russia/Gas== |
==Ukraine/Russia/Gas== |
||
Thanks for the clean-up on [[Russia–Ukraine gas disputes]]! This [http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/3108/ Gas negotiations with Ukraine again fail to produce significant progress - Gazprom] article nicely sums up what happened the last months (I think), maybe hand to read. -- [[User:Mariah-Yulia|Mariah-Yulia]] ([[User talk:Mariah-Yulia|talk]]) 18:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for the clean-up on [[Russia–Ukraine gas disputes]]! This [http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/3108/ Gas negotiations with Ukraine again fail to produce significant progress - Gazprom] article nicely sums up what happened the last months (I think), maybe hand to read. -- [[User:Mariah-Yulia|Mariah-Yulia]] ([[User talk:Mariah-Yulia|talk]]) 18:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
{{userbox|#F0E88C|FFFFF|[[Image:WP UKR Barn.png|72px]]|<big>I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for improving the [[Russia–Ukraine gas disputes]] article. -- [[User:Mariah-Yulia|Mariah-Yulia]] ([[User talk:Mariah-Yulia|talk]]) 18:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)<big/>}} |
Revision as of 18:52, 17 December 2008
Hi. I know you say you have left, but just in case you still watch this page, the featured list Nuclear power by country has been nominated for removal. You can comment at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Nuclear power by country. I was looking through the talk page and saw that you thought it should be nominated about three months ago. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 21:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Alemayehu Tegenu
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alemayehu Tegenu, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RMHED (talk) 20:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
RE:FA help
Hmm, I don't think we can take this on as a mission, but I'll be sure to help prose-wise. Best, —Ceran♦(Sing) 22:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back!
Good to see you starting to edit again. Welcome back!
Sorry I had to vote to delist Nuclear power by country, but it seems to need a fair bit of work... Johnfos (talk) 05:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
DYK for Oil shale in Jordan
Gatoclass (talk) 08:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Nice work BTW. Nice to see a country like Jordan with a DYK rather than the typical America, Britain, Australia and IndiaDr. Blofeld (talk)
DYK for Oil shale in Estonia
Gatoclass (talk) 12:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Oil Shale Extraction
OK, I will look at the article again. JMiall₰ 12:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Mining companies of the People's Republic of China, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Mining companies of the People's Republic of China has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Mining companies of the People's Republic of China, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank You!!
=D Fintan264 (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I didn't notice that you wrote something in the Talk Page of this article. I already replied - basically I agreed with your suggestion on having separate article, but in my opinion, it's better to have one unified article because both oil and natural gas pipelines will be built under the same one project (possibly same route too). Furthermore, if the article is separated into 2 (oil and natural gas pipelines), I think we will just have simply 2 articles with not very much content in them. Heilme (talk) 17:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- I answered on the article talk page, proposed a new name.Beagel (talk) 17:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
African national oil companies
- I hadn't caught that EG LNG wasn't owned by Equatorial Guinea, it is part of the GEPetrol website just like the other companies; I am left with the question of deciding whether or not an oil and gas company is national if it is run by the government as opposed to simply being owned by the government, and to whether the government has anything to do with running this particular company in the first place. I am not planning to do anything about this, at this time.
- In view of the fact that National Oil Corporation of Kenya has a mandate from the government to participate in all petroleum and natural gas related issues and developments within Kenya, I would vote that it does belong in Category:Energy in Kenya. Here's a link to the NOCK site with the company mandate information: - http://www.nockenya.co.ke/content.asp?ctid=2&title=About%20NOCK - if you've the time to check.
- Might this categorization decision have something to do with the potential work involved in future explanation of why one oil company is in the category per se, while others are placed in the Oil companies category? --Mr Accountable (talk) 23:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers --Mr Accountable (talk) 22:38, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- EG LNG is not a national oil or gas company. Although 25% of shares is owned by the national gas company Sonagas, the other partners are international companies. Also, this is a special project company and not involved in the development of national hydrocarbon resources more widely like classical NOCs.
- Concerning National Oil Corporation of Kenya, the category of Category:Oil companies of Kenya is a subcategory of Category:Energy in Kenya. As a rule, if there is a more precise subcategory, the parent category is not included. ::If the company belongs to the Category:National oil and gas companies, it also belongs to the country-based category of oil companies, not in the more general "energy in ..." category. Beagel (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- I agree on EG LNG, perhaps I wasn't clear; as for NOCK, the point I am making, is that it belongs in both categories. --Mr Accountable (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, it belongs in categories Category:Oil companies of Kenya and Category:National oil and gas companies. As Category:Energy in Kenya is the parent category for Category:Oil companies of Kenya, NOCK should be categorized in the Category:Oil companies of Kenya and not in the Category:Energy in Kenya. Beagel (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, it has an omniscient role in determining Kenya's energy policy, due to its constitutional mandate; the only reason not to put it in Category:Energy in Kenya is that this categorization situation is simply too complicated to explain to the next casual user who will come along and replace the categories as they are now. Due to this technical wikisituation I say that sadly, NOCK is out of the category Category:Energy in Kenya. It's a "TKO", if you'll pardon the pun. --Mr Accountable (talk) 21:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think we're done here. --Mr Accountable (talk) 22:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, it belongs in categories Category:Oil companies of Kenya and Category:National oil and gas companies. As Category:Energy in Kenya is the parent category for Category:Oil companies of Kenya, NOCK should be categorized in the Category:Oil companies of Kenya and not in the Category:Energy in Kenya. Beagel (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- I agree on EG LNG, perhaps I wasn't clear; as for NOCK, the point I am making, is that it belongs in both categories. --Mr Accountable (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Concerning National Oil Corporation of Kenya, the category of Category:Oil companies of Kenya is a subcategory of Category:Energy in Kenya. As a rule, if there is a more precise subcategory, the parent category is not included. ::If the company belongs to the Category:National oil and gas companies, it also belongs to the country-based category of oil companies, not in the more general "energy in ..." category. Beagel (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Stubs
I don't know much about stubs, but tend to agree with you - I think there are too many articles marked as stub. — Sebastian 09:21, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Article on Bharat Thakur
Hi, Thanks for the suggestions. I'm still in the process of editing the article and I will incorporate your suggestions. Could you please check out the "Artistic Yoga" article too. It got tagged for having subjective content. I edited it. Could you please let me know how it reads now. I will use your Reference suggestion for this article as well.
Appreciate your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Divya Sivaramakrishnan (talk • contribs) 17:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestion on my Article. I am working on it!!!
A quick question for you - some of my images got removed from articles as the copyright info was incomplete. I have updated the info - can i just put the images back? What about your tags? Can i remove them once i have made the changes? My question in a nutshell - who removes the tags?
Really appreciate your taking the time to answer tedious questions. Divya Sivaramakrishnan (talk) 11:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Super! Phew - You're a great help to new wiki-users like me! Thanks! Divya Sivaramakrishnan (talk) 17:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Estonian surface mining
Thanks for the invitation to look at Estonian oil shale mining. The article uses the term "open-cast" which is somewhat uncommon in the US; I believe it is more commonly used in other English-speaking countries. In US usage, with which I am most familiar, "open-pit mining" and "strip mining" are distinct forms of surface mining. Unfortunately, I can't tell you the precise usage of "open-cast mining"; it may well include both. In addition, I can't tell from the article if the mining in Estonia is by open pit or strip mining. It may well be either for all I can tell. Sorry that I'm not more help. Plazak (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Energy service company
Thank you for the merge! — Sebastian 18:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) (Please reply on this page. I'll be watching it for a while.)
DYK for Paul Kogerman
BorgQueen (talk) 14:42, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Wide area synchronous grid and super grid need class and rating
I created these earlier in the week. I didn't see what the process was for nomination on the energy portal, but I noticed you were cruising around rating these. Super grid is a split from the grid article. -J JMesserly (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
DYK for Galoter process
BorgQueen (talk) 03:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for the Barnstar. It is interesting to research and compile info for the energy articles, and it is getting to the stage where there is enough info to be useful. However, the wind farm articles seem to attract opposition. For example, I am currently trying to get deletion of Te Waka Wind Farm reversed. --Pakaraki (talk) 04:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Invitation
Ukraine/Russia/Gas
Thanks for the clean-up on Russia–Ukraine gas disputes! This Gas negotiations with Ukraine again fail to produce significant progress - Gazprom article nicely sums up what happened the last months (I think), maybe hand to read. -- Mariah-Yulia (talk) 18:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for improving the Russia–Ukraine gas disputes article. -- Mariah-Yulia (talk) 18:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |