Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made {{#if:User talk:Fifelfoo| to [[:User talk:Fifelfoo]]}} has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed because it was a misuse of a [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace|warning or blocking template]]. Please use the [[User talk:Sandbox for user warnings|user warnings sandbox]] for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. {{#if:Hungarian Revolution of 1956|Hungarian Revolution of 1956|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-tempabuse1 --> |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made {{#if:User talk:Fifelfoo| to [[:User talk:Fifelfoo]]}} has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed because it was a misuse of a [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace|warning or blocking template]]. Please use the [[User talk:Sandbox for user warnings|user warnings sandbox]] for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. {{#if:Hungarian Revolution of 1956|Hungarian Revolution of 1956|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-tempabuse1 --> |
||
:It looks like that user doesnt know that the removal of a referenced material is called vandalism...--'''<font color="#151B8D" face="comic sans ms">[[User:Baxter9|B@xter]]</font>'''<sup><font color="red">[[User talk:Baxter9|9]]</font></sup> 16:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC) |
:It looks like that user doesnt know that the removal of a referenced material is called vandalism...--'''<font color="#151B8D" face="comic sans ms">[[User:Baxter9|B@xter]]</font>'''<sup><font color="red">[[User talk:Baxter9|9]]</font></sup> 16:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Your reference wasn't quality. |
|||
:::It was foreign language. Which goes to VERIFIABILITY. When your source doesn't meet RS. Which an incidental non-scholarly publication on the 56 Institutes page counts as. (if not being TERTIARY which is again inappropriate for an encyclopedia). |
|||
:::Scholarly, peer reviewed works. Citing a website which is a chronology is simply not adequate. Notice how I kept your Hungarian Academy of Sciences' work? (Which is miscited by the way, unless it really is an 800 page corporate authored work without internal chapters.) Work on your RS criteria, and fix your citations. [[User:Fifelfoo|Fifelfoo]] ([[User talk:Fifelfoo|talk]]) 16:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:26, 28 September 2009
Hu-Ro WarHi, You changed the name of the section again. Please motivate your action in the discussion section, under the appropriate subsection, before someone comes in and changes it again. I'll leave it the way it is now for a few days, to give you time to write the motivation. If you do not elaborate a bit on your reasons to change the title, I'll revert it to the more neutral formulation. Thanks for the hint about the site, I was aware about it, it is also cited in the Bibliography section of the article. Regards. Octavian8 (talk) 21:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Extremist partiesHi, you have added extremist parties again to Slovakian politics pages. Could you please clarify this act? I would like to point out that extremist parties are illegal in Slovak Republic. toxygen (talk) 17:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey You!!!come to uncyclopedia, the best wikipedia in the world!!! atleast visit uncyclopedia and see some of their articles. (the website was made by the wikipedia people) heres a link: uncyclopedia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cubby300 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC) What about that?[5] (as a response to [6]). Cheers, --RCS (talk) 12:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC) [[:Image:Spp-poster.jpg|thumb|240px|right|Swiss People's Party, this is not nazism (?)]]
{{cite web}} : Check date values in: |date= (help); line feed character in |publisher= at position 36 (help)
LisztSzia! Tudnál találni egy jó forrást arról, hogy milyen anyanyelvű volt Liszt? Beszéltem a szlovák wikin egy magyar szerkesztővel Liszt származásáról, és én a onnan tudom azt, hogy az ottani cikk szerint Liszt szlovák anyanyelvű volt. Ugyanakkor, ha lenne ennek az ellenkezőjéről valami jó forrás, akkor az a szlovák wikin is meg tudna jelenni.--Nmate (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Your signatureI caught your signature on ANI and saw a lot of html formatting in it. You could probably get away with getting rid of some tags or condensing them. Might I suggest the following (same result, different code)? '''<font color="#151B8D" face="comic sans ms">[[User:Baxter9|B@xter]]</font>''' <sup><font color="red">[[User talk:Baxter9|9]]</font></sup> That should appear as the following, which is identical to what you already have. So all you have to do is copy the above code (between the pre tags) and you should be fine and have a smaller more compact signature code.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Thanks Baxter9 for your message, but I did end my message with 4~. However, I saw Ryulong's above suggestion, so I might start using that. Thanks for you observation anyway - take care... Dinkytown 17:00, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
RedirectCan you also add a redirect of the "Grand Principality of Transylvania" to the List of Rulers of Transylvania page. I don't know how to do that. thanks[
Potential SuperpowersI've just updated the article "Potential superpower" because the citations were too old and the article didn't present anymore with fullfill criterias today situation.Thanks.151.60.116.131 (talk) 07:38, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
HelloKöszönöm az üzenetet! Igyekszik az ember, és ahogy a szaporodó angol nyelvű, Délkelet-Európáról szóló irodalmat nézem, ránk is fér. (Habár szerencsére, az utóbbi 15 évben külföldi szerzőktől megjelent művek már kezdenek egészen ésszerű módon írni a kérdéskörről). Hamarosan lesz még 2-3 (móc szerzők által írt) angol nyelvű irodalmam, és utána nekiállok az "eredet" kérdésének. Ha esetleg van neked is irodalmad, érdemes lenne együttműködni. Mellesleg, én kifejezetten kedvelem délkeleti (keleti) szomszédainkat, többek között privát okok miatt is, de egyszerűen idegesítenek a primitív vagy semmitmondó szócikkek érdekes témákról (az utóbbira jó példa a "kereszténység délkeleti szomszédunknál" cikk, illetve az ő déli szomszédaik őslakos lakosságának és az ő folyamatosságukat a Dunától északra bemutató cikk - komolyan, néha olyan viccesek tudnak lenni egyébként értelmesnek tűnő emberek). Egyébként, azt hiszem, hogy a következő nagyobb falat néhány magyar történelmi tárgyú cikk lesz (habár azokkal távolról sincs akkora gond, csak néha egy-két lelkes ifjú végigsöpör rajtuk, és nem veszik észre, hogy a lelkesedésükkel nekünk ártanak). Borsoka (talk) 17:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
BratislavaOh, THAT sentence was the problem. I removed it only as I considered it to be duplicating the lead's first sentence, no real problem with it, can be as it is, sorry for the confusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wladthemlat (talk • contribs) 09:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Hi, i thought we have reached a consensus in there, could you please talk some sense into Hobartimus and Nmate, the latter especially. And please check also Jobbik. I don't know what the sudden warring is all about as no one cared until recently. Thanks. wlad 18:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Of course, but as Bratislava is currently the capital of Slovakia it is natural to address some milestones from the point of view of the Slovak territory. Anyway, Bratislava was not the most important city in KoHU, you have changed the original meaning. I do not know about the bank, if it was the first in the whole kingdom, ok, point it out. But if there was a bank in say Pest before that, it is perfectly fine to note, that the bank founded in 1842 was the first in what is today Slovakia, as that is completely true and not at all anachronistic. wlad 13:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Hungarian is not completely equivalent to Magyar. Magyar emphasizes the ethnicity, Hungarian is a broader term for an inhabitant of the multiethnic KoHU in the pre-1918 period. Just like English and British are interchanged often, but are not equivalent. wlad 20:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: August 2009Stop trying to reconquer Slovakia. --Milkbreath (talk) 19:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
2009 (UTC)
Re: Read this![]() You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. ![]() You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. By the way, when we're at WP:NCGN, could you please enforce it equally vigorously there as well? I have come into some lengthy and tiresome re-warting with Nmate. Thank you. wlad 20:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
JobbikThank you for your constructive edits to this page: I have not changed them. Please note however that this page is subject to some controversy, therefore when making a series of edtis, it is probably best to leave an explanatory note (no matter how brief) in the talk page after doing so. Thanks. Tedhovis (talk) 10:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC) HoffmanOnly after you provide the same for the Hungarian quotes. Wladthemlat (talk) 09:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Hoffman[7] Here's a link Wladthemlat (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
56 Article FARHello Baxter9, If you have a moment, please take a look here. Thanks! István (talk) 07:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC) my editsHi! just take a look at the contribution of this "genious" http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=Toroko whose only activity is deleteing data about Croatia. Do not be like him! And , do not call my edits false,please!--Añtó| Àntó (talk) 13:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
|