AussieLegend (talk | contribs) →Edit warring at MOS: please do as I ask |
BarbadosKen (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
:::::I think you will find that repeatedly pushing your own edits into the Manual of Style without proper discussion is what will be determined to be edit-warring. As I have indicated at the MOS talk page, I oppose your changes until they have been thoroughly discussed by other editors. How long that discussion takes depends on the subject. It could be seven days, it could be 30, it could be months. Wikipedia discussions don't have fixed lengths. Now, please make all further posts regarding this at the MOS and not here, as I requested. --[[User:AussieLegend|'''<span style="color:#008751;">Aussie</span><span style="color:#fcd116;">Legend</span>''']] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|<big>✉</big>]]) 16:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC) |
:::::I think you will find that repeatedly pushing your own edits into the Manual of Style without proper discussion is what will be determined to be edit-warring. As I have indicated at the MOS talk page, I oppose your changes until they have been thoroughly discussed by other editors. How long that discussion takes depends on the subject. It could be seven days, it could be 30, it could be months. Wikipedia discussions don't have fixed lengths. Now, please make all further posts regarding this at the MOS and not here, as I requested. --[[User:AussieLegend|'''<span style="color:#008751;">Aussie</span><span style="color:#fcd116;">Legend</span>''']] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|<big>✉</big>]]) 16:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
{{discussion bottom}} |
{{discussion bottom}} |
||
I see that you consider the discussion closed without answering my question as to how long you think a discussion should remain open without attracting opposition in order to assume a consensus. I will therefore arbitrarily set the time at 1 week, upon which I will revert your reversion if no opposition is provided in the MOS talk page. At that point, if you revert me again, I will file a complaint against you. [[User:BarbadosKen|BarbadosKen]] ([[User talk:BarbadosKen|talk]]) 16:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:53, 28 December 2018
pages Userboxes Cheatsheet Vandals, bad
sources etc TV programs
It is approximately 9:03 PM where this user lives (NSW). [ ] |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31 |
This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Threads with no replies in 7 days may be automatically moved. Discussions here are automatically indexed by User:Legobot) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Linkspam again
Merry Merry
Happy Christmas! | ||
Hello AussieLegend, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 07:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hi AussieLegend ok thanks for the message and sorry it just didn't make sense to keep all on one just two i was just doing the right thing but ok. User talk:TMarrofficialuser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmarrofficialuser (talk • contribs) 06:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
| |
Hi AussieLegend, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
Yo Ho Ho
Edit warring at MOS
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Why do you keep reverting my addition to the MOS? Do you actually have a reason to oppose the proposed change? If so, could you state it in the MOS's talk page? BarbadosKen (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have already posted at the MOS talkpage. You CANNOT claim consensus after only 4 days when nobody has discussed and when you have already been reverted. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:15, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note that your post at the MOS's talk page simply state that you oppose the change, without providing a rationale. That is equivalent to an WP:IDONTLIKEIT argument. As pointed out to you in the talk page, please provide a rationale why you oppose the change. So far, the only thing you gave was timing - 4 days is not sufficient for you. How many days would you consider sufficient? BarbadosKen (talk) 16:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Again, I've already responded at the MOS talk page. Please try to keep the discussion all in one place. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- The discussion at the MOS talk page is about the proposal. This discussion is about your edit warring. Again, if you just oppose the change due to timing, how long do you think the discussion should remain open without opposition until consensus can be assumed? BarbadosKen (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I think you will find that repeatedly pushing your own edits into the Manual of Style without proper discussion is what will be determined to be edit-warring. As I have indicated at the MOS talk page, I oppose your changes until they have been thoroughly discussed by other editors. How long that discussion takes depends on the subject. It could be seven days, it could be 30, it could be months. Wikipedia discussions don't have fixed lengths. Now, please make all further posts regarding this at the MOS and not here, as I requested. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- The discussion at the MOS talk page is about the proposal. This discussion is about your edit warring. Again, if you just oppose the change due to timing, how long do you think the discussion should remain open without opposition until consensus can be assumed? BarbadosKen (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Again, I've already responded at the MOS talk page. Please try to keep the discussion all in one place. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note that your post at the MOS's talk page simply state that you oppose the change, without providing a rationale. That is equivalent to an WP:IDONTLIKEIT argument. As pointed out to you in the talk page, please provide a rationale why you oppose the change. So far, the only thing you gave was timing - 4 days is not sufficient for you. How many days would you consider sufficient? BarbadosKen (talk) 16:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
I see that you consider the discussion closed without answering my question as to how long you think a discussion should remain open without attracting opposition in order to assume a consensus. I will therefore arbitrarily set the time at 1 week, upon which I will revert your reversion if no opposition is provided in the MOS talk page. At that point, if you revert me again, I will file a complaint against you. BarbadosKen (talk) 16:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)