MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 31d) to User talk:ArtifexMayhem/Archive 1. |
→Discretionary sanctions warning: new section |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
Kindly your views on the talk page, thank you. [[Special:Contributions/84.106.26.81|84.106.26.81]] ([[User talk:84.106.26.81|talk]]) 07:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC) |
Kindly your views on the talk page, thank you. [[Special:Contributions/84.106.26.81|84.106.26.81]] ([[User talk:84.106.26.81|talk]]) 07:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Discretionary sanctions warning == |
|||
It seems nobody has notified you of the discretionary sanctions in the race and intelligence topic yet, so I'm notifying you of them now. If you continue blanking every section that you think has a problem and making no effort to improve any of them, you probably will be reported at AE eventually. [[User:Akuri|Akuri]] ([[User talk:Akuri|talk]]) 13:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:17, 7 April 2013
Hello, ArtifexMayhem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Aristotle? Well, that's got to be the least controversial edit ever done to the article. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 04:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- I figured I should put something down before I ripped out that unsourced, factually wrong, Hippocratic Oath bit of fucking insane propaganda and replaced it with reality. That will be more interesting :) Nice Marlin karma btw. ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- I was just coming here to thank you for catching that one.
- Meanwhile, there's a bit of Leviticus or Deuteronomy that says, roughly, that if you beat a woman to death, you shall be put to death. (That happens a lot in those books.) However, if you beat her just enough that she has a miscarriage, you just have to give her husband some money. So much for the value of fetuses. I'll try to find some non-OR way to work it in after the forthcoming Hippocrates brouhaha. PhGustaf (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- I also like this bit...."In the 20th century the Soviet Union (1919), Iceland (1935) and Sweden (1938)....legalize certain or all forms of abortion. In 1935 Nazi Germany..."
- Can you find the two red herrings? ArtifexMayhem (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Poking around, I see that Judaism and abortion already quotes Exodus 21:22-23. Not sure whether that would fit in the top article, but I'll think about it. PhGustaf (talk) 06:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For scientifically explaining why WTC7 was not exploded due to bombs, thermite, or any variant thereof. Toa Nidhiki05 04:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC) |
- Many thanks. Getting it into the articles will be the hard bit. Do you it's time the Collapse of 7 World Trade Center article? Again, thanks for the message. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
DFTT?
As at [1] ?LeadSongDog come howl! 17:11, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yep. That was a mistake on my part. Thanks for smacking me on it:) — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 00:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
hi
hey hello!
About this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cold_fusion&diff=545554777&oldid=545469120
In 2008 Arata's cold fusion contraption was peer reviewed and replicated. We have no reliable sources that question these results. If you want to reduce this to something hypothetical you need to provide sources for that theory as well. If you can provide a citation that considers Arata's contraption hypothetical that would have to be attributed to the source as well.
Kindly your views on the talk page, thank you. 84.106.26.81 (talk) 07:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions warning
It seems nobody has notified you of the discretionary sanctions in the race and intelligence topic yet, so I'm notifying you of them now. If you continue blanking every section that you think has a problem and making no effort to improve any of them, you probably will be reported at AE eventually. Akuri (talk) 13:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)