Anon user |
|||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
True, yes, but not in the way she put it. She took issue with some of my less temperate comments on the VFD page and sent me a lengthy e-mail about what a horrible person I am, including her usual threats of legal action. She presents my response as though it were an unprovoked attack, which is certainly not the case. [[User:Ben-w|Ben-w]] 7 July 2005 23:24 (UTC) |
True, yes, but not in the way she put it. She took issue with some of my less temperate comments on the VFD page and sent me a lengthy e-mail about what a horrible person I am, including her usual threats of legal action. She presents my response as though it were an unprovoked attack, which is certainly not the case. [[User:Ben-w|Ben-w]] 7 July 2005 23:24 (UTC) |
||
*Yeah, that's what I figured. She seems a bit high-strung, and the legal threats are just maddening. I don't know how diplomatic or not you were in the email, but I can't say I blame you if you got a bit harsh. <font color=#00A86B>[[User:Android79|<small>A</small>и<small>D</small>я<small>01D</small>]]</font><font color=#B87333>[[User talk:Android79|<small>TALK</small>]]</font><font color=#0047AB>[[Special:Emailuser/Android79|<small>EMAIL</small>]]</font> July 8, 2005 00:22 (UTC) |
*Yeah, that's what I figured. She seems a bit high-strung, and the legal threats are just maddening. I don't know how diplomatic or not you were in the email, but I can't say I blame you if you got a bit harsh. <font color=#00A86B>[[User:Android79|<small>A</small>и<small>D</small>я<small>01D</small>]]</font><font color=#B87333>[[User talk:Android79|<small>TALK</small>]]</font><font color=#0047AB>[[Special:Emailuser/Android79|<small>EMAIL</small>]]</font> July 8, 2005 00:22 (UTC) |
||
== Anon user == |
|||
Hello. You have reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/134.161.144.50|134.161.144.50]] on the [[George W. Bush]] article, and now this user demands to know why. Please see [[Talk:George W. Bush#stop deleting my additions]]; maybe we can resolve this somehow. Thanks, <font color="#3D9140">[[User:Sango123|Sango]]</font><font color="#006400">[[User talk:Sango123|123]]</font> 21:31, July 13, 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:31, 13 July 2005
vandalism
Hi Android79, I've taken the time to read the page you so graciously provided defining vandalism. Apparently you were correct that well-intentioned vandalism is a contradictio in terminis, since vandalism includes "indisputably bad-faith". I regret using the word vandalism. It seems to have a rather stronger meaning than I had in mind. Unfortunately I am at a loss for another word. --MarSch 2 July 2005 11:29 (UTC)
- Hey MarSch. Thanks for taking the time to read that. I figured our argument was more over a misunderstanding of terminology than anything else. Unfortunately, I can't think of a term or phrase that would describe what we talked about, either. Cheers, AиDя01DTALKEMAIL July 2, 2005 18:05 (UTC)
Kardos Kingdom
Dudtz-one of our doctors was on Good Morning America "Help! I'm being repressed!" — Dudtz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Dragon's Flight pointed out a serious omission to this proposal: that the image description page of WikiCommons should include the content of the one on Wikipedia. I have reworded the proposal to include that. Because the wording changed, I have hidden your vote; please read the new version and reinstate your vote if you still support (or move it to oppose, or delete it, as you see fit). Yours, Radiant_>|< July 5, 2005 08:16 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/3
PBurka pointed out that an important omission from this proposal: a band could meet WP:MUSIC criterion #5 (sharing a member with a famous band) and still be speedily deletable by this criterion. I've added a sentence to the proposal to reflect this: it now reads An article about a musician or music group that does not assert having released at least one album, nor having had media coverage, nor having a member that is or was also part of a well-known music group. If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to VFD instead. Please consider if you support this new wording, and change your vote if not. Yours, Radiant_>|< July 5, 2005 09:54 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you with the requests above. Those two proposals were the only two that had an important omission and required a quick fix while there were still relatively few voters. I'm sure there'll be plenty more discussion, but no more significant changes. I've extended the voting period by one day to ensure they get their proper time. Thank you for your consideration. Radiant_>|< July 5, 2005 10:05 (UTC)
CSD Proposal 3-B
You voted or commented on Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/3-B or Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/3-A or both. I have proposed a revised version, at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/3-C. This version is intended to address objections made by many of those oppsoed to 3-A or 3-B. The revised propsal refers explicitly and directly to the criteria at WP:MUSIC. If you have not already done so, please examine the revised proposal and vote on it also. Thank you. DES 6 July 2005 04:55 (UTC)
3RR
Report him for 3RR on the phony "GWB delete" page. A speedy delete would be less effective IMO. NoSeptemberT 6 July 2005 21:34 (UTC)
- Or, a third option: WP:VIP. I'll do 3RR if that doesn't get quick results. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL July 6, 2005 21:35 (UTC)
911 Horoscope
True, yes, but not in the way she put it. She took issue with some of my less temperate comments on the VFD page and sent me a lengthy e-mail about what a horrible person I am, including her usual threats of legal action. She presents my response as though it were an unprovoked attack, which is certainly not the case. Ben-w 7 July 2005 23:24 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I figured. She seems a bit high-strung, and the legal threats are just maddening. I don't know how diplomatic or not you were in the email, but I can't say I blame you if you got a bit harsh. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL July 8, 2005 00:22 (UTC)
Anon user
Hello. You have reverted edits by 134.161.144.50 on the George W. Bush article, and now this user demands to know why. Please see Talk:George W. Bush#stop deleting my additions; maybe we can resolve this somehow. Thanks, Sango123 21:31, July 13, 2005 (UTC)