Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) Notification: listing at articles for deletion of List of diplomatic missions in Iraqi Kurdistan. (TW) |
→Syrian Civil War topic area: new section |
||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Vanjagenije|Vanjagenije]] ([[User talk:Vanjagenije|talk]]) 22:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC) |
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Vanjagenije|Vanjagenije]] ([[User talk:Vanjagenije|talk]]) 22:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Syrian Civil War topic area == |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
| As a result of a [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive253#Request to amend sanctions on Syrian civil war articles|community decision]], broad [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|editing restrictions]] apply to all pages broadly related to the [[Syrian Civil War]]. These sanctions are described at [[Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions]] and a brief summary is included below: |
|||
*Sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. |
|||
*If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic or article ban. |
|||
*A [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|one revert per twenty-four hours restriction]] applies to articles broadly related to the Syrian Civil War, with the wording listed [[Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions#1RR|here]]. |
|||
*Please familiarise yourself with the full decision at [[Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions]] before making any further edits to pages related to the Syrian Civil War. |
|||
*Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|appropriate administrators' noticeboard]]. |
|||
Sanctions may only be imposed after the user is notified sanctions are in effect. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.<p> |
|||
This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at [[Talk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications]]. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 14:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
| Ambox warning blue.svg |
|||
| icon size = 50px}} |
Revision as of 14:51, 22 July 2014
I have found some fabrication information which is made intentionally by you and added in some pages. Your additions are not realiable in most cases. If you claim an idea, you must submit proper and trustable sources. Otherwise, people will keep to correct or delete your additions.
List of Kurds
Hi, Ahmetyal. Please stop remove template. I found many wrong information. Some of them are not Kurds, but Turks, Zazas etc... when you have a time, could you provide reliable sources ? Takabeg (talk) 13:00, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Takabeg, you have removed Mehmed Uzun, even though it says on his page that he is Kurdish. Why? Ahmetyal (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Articles of Wikipedia(s) themselves are not Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. In the article List of Kurds, Mehmed Uzun is not the only problem. Takabeg (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Denmark and the European Union, Ahmetyal!
Wikipedia editor Bensci54 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This looks like a quality article, well done.
To reply, leave a comment on Bensci54's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Denmark and the European Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiegel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Re-revert
I appreciate your efforts and intentions, to improve wikipedia, however...
Reverting something back, straight after a revert (at least when it is your edit that was originally reverted), is against proper wiki etiquette.
To qoute (from here):
"/.../a revert should not be reverted again by the same editors until the changes have been discussed, as that could constitute edit warring, which is a policy that all editors must follow."
Also Wikipedia:Reverting states:
"If you make an edit which is good-faith reverted, do not simply reinstate your edit - leave the status quo up. If there is a dispute, the status quo reigns until a consensus is established to make a change. Instead of engaging in an edit war, propose your reverted change on the article's talk page or pursue other dispute resolution alternatives."
...and while diplomatic missions in Iraqi Kurdistan and of Iraqi Kurdistan, are indeed separate (though it is hard to notice), which means that there indeed isn't any confusing duplication, there is still no readily apparent reason to include the links. I would appreciate a more proper explanation and motivation of your edits, rather than just reverting. Preferably on the talk page or the article.--ZarlanTheGreen (talk) 02:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Kurds in Kazakhstan
Hi please translate the article: Kurds in Kazakhstan for adding to www.ku.wikipedia.org, I will make it on www.ckb.wikipedia.org. 2.177.29.126 (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Mehmet Ali Erbil
Sen linki tiklamadin mi ? Haber Vitrin Turkmen oldugunu yaziyor :) Sanirim kullanici rastgele kaynagi eklemistir. Takabeg (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ayrica "Kurtce konustu" haberi onun Kurt oldugunu kanitlayan bir kaynak degildir. Mesela Kurt olmayanlar da, mesela ben de, Kurtce konusmak gerektiginde konusuyoruz :) Biraz mantikli yaklasmamiz lazim. Takabeg (talk) 18:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar for you
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Here is a barnstar for your neutral contributions aganist users who vandalize the articles. Keep it up!--Gomada (talk) 11:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC) |
Discussion
Hello, there is currently a discussion at AN [1] about a disruptive IP editor with whom you have been involved.Jeppiz (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Gaziantep shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Macrakis (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hülya Avşar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Ahmetyal. I wanted to let you know that I filed a report at ANI about the user who has been disrupting this article. I would urge you to consider making no further reversions there, at least until the situation is resolved. Rivertorch (talk) 10:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
aren't you a kurd? how can you change South Kurdistan to Iraqi Kurdistan??? if you're a kurd please be a real one! if you're not then let my country be free. Hereshsniper (talk) 21:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC) |
Cira Zaza people hen xirabin racernena? Zazay kamê kam niyê ti qe nêzonena hama xo xo ra zuri nusena. Zonê to ki zazaki niyo. Did you understand it? ZonêMa (talk) 15:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Çemişgezek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zaza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Syrian civil war detailed map
Why you removed the red ring around the village Falitah which displays that the village in surrounded by the Syrian troops but not specifying the source confirming your edit.this But also why you are removing the villages on map without specifying the reasons for their removal. Hanibal911 (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- The village of 'Ikidam' was removed, because the village doesn't exist. The latitude/longitude (36.726 37.032) are coordinates for a road/forest. Some villages were added twice, as Kashtaar/Kishta'ar, so I removed the latter.
The Falitah red ring is my fault. I will readd this one. --Ahmetyal (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Syrian Kurdish–Islamist conflict (2013-present)
We should not use FaceBook as a source for this article. Please see [[2]]. Also note that there is a 1RR restriction on this article. " editors of this article are restricted to 1 revert per 24 hours". Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- But isn't it better to have Facebook as a source, instead of no source at all? We should just add Template:Verify credibility. --Ahmetyal (talk) 18:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Kurdish population (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Gwent, West Midlands, Counties of Wales and Lapland
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
The sources you cited here are either unavailable or do not mention the province at all – therefore, please replace them, because otherwise I would have to revert your changes. Thanks in advance. FDMS 4 12:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
regarding Iraq insurgency man
I have looked into Al-Awja and it is under complete control of the Iraqi government, the source provided by IP 86.26.230.122 was correct and now there are other news agencies reporting on this news
http://www.telegraaf.nl/buitenland/22796775/__Iraaks_leger_herovert_Al-Awja__.html
please stop reverting sourced changes, you had no reference of your own and no basis to your claim.
I have added you to the wikipedia red alert watchlist , refer to wikipedia terms of use for further details: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use
Regards
Jumada (talk) 15:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Yes I do apologize, you have been removed from wikipedia red alert watchlist.
regards
Jumada (talk) 15:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of List of diplomatic missions in Iraqi Kurdistan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of diplomatic missions in Iraqi Kurdistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of diplomatic missions in Iraqi Kurdistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Syrian Civil War topic area
As a result of a community decision, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related to the Syrian Civil War. These sanctions are described at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions and a brief summary is included below:
- Sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process.
- If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic or article ban.
- A one revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Syrian Civil War, with the wording listed here.
- Please familiarise yourself with the full decision at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions before making any further edits to pages related to the Syrian Civil War.
- Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard.
This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at Talk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)