Ad Orientem (talk | contribs) status= online |
Ad Orientem (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
Hi there! I'm really sorry that I feel the need to involve you in this again, but I don't see how this issue will rectify itself and I really don't want to let it escalate any further. The user Isento (if you remember from a couple weeks ago) continues to be incivil and is sending ridiculing and condescending message to editors, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974761085 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974759960 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974769356 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Isento&diff=prev&oldid=974769981 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bgkc4444&diff=prev&oldid=974770323 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974770863 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Isento&diff=prev&oldid=974772011 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974773979 here]. Isento is also starting edit wars instead of following BRD and resolving the dispute, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974761085 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974764857 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974759960 here]. He also put a generic template message on my talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bgkc4444&diff=prev&oldid=974764889 here] in order to aggravate me. I wrote messages on his talk page twice and responded to his message on mine in order to engage with him, but he refused to engage in conversation and continued with the incivil replies in each. He is succeeding in his goal of trying to cause me distress and annoyance and in preventing me from enjoying editing on Wikipedia. I am at a loss for what to do. [[User:Bgkc4444|Bgkc4444]] ([[User talk:Bgkc4444|talk]]) 10:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Bgkc4444 |
Hi there! I'm really sorry that I feel the need to involve you in this again, but I don't see how this issue will rectify itself and I really don't want to let it escalate any further. The user Isento (if you remember from a couple weeks ago) continues to be incivil and is sending ridiculing and condescending message to editors, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974761085 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974759960 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974769356 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Isento&diff=prev&oldid=974769981 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bgkc4444&diff=prev&oldid=974770323 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974770863 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Isento&diff=prev&oldid=974772011 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974773979 here]. Isento is also starting edit wars instead of following BRD and resolving the dispute, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974761085 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974764857 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyonc%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=974759960 here]. He also put a generic template message on my talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bgkc4444&diff=prev&oldid=974764889 here] in order to aggravate me. I wrote messages on his talk page twice and responded to his message on mine in order to engage with him, but he refused to engage in conversation and continued with the incivil replies in each. He is succeeding in his goal of trying to cause me distress and annoyance and in preventing me from enjoying editing on Wikipedia. I am at a loss for what to do. [[User:Bgkc4444|Bgkc4444]] ([[User talk:Bgkc4444|talk]]) 10:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Bgkc4444 |
||
:{{re|Bgkc4444}} I'm sorry, but the diffs you posted are not actionable, either individually or collectively. The article talk is in fact where discussion belongs when dealing with content disputes. This allows other interested parties to join the conversation. If you think they are edit warring, you can take it to [[WP:3RRN]]. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. This requires us to work with other editors and handle disagreements w/o taking differences of opinion personally. Finally, please be restrained in posting on their talk page as I asked them to refrain from commenting on yours. (Templates are a generally recognized exception to such requests.) I strongly advise you to discuss disagreements on article talk pages and be sure to cite sources along with the appropriate [[WP:PAG|policies and guidelines]]. Thank you for your continued contributions to the project... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 15:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:28, 25 August 2020
Status: Online
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Reference desk/Guidelines/Medical advice on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:32, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Religion in the European Union on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
the U.K. is a democratic republic
Better accept that. Windsor figureheads w/o power notwithstanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.0.132 (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- So... what's the weather like in your plane of reality? -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Are you kidding me?
This person baselessly and repeatedly accuses me of racism and misogyny ([1], [2], [3]), and you give me the warning? isento (talk) 22:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- In case you missed it, I also left a general warning on their talk page. But for the record...
- ... is not defensible and is certainly an abuse of NPA. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Possible block evasion by Hello im a dude
You have blocked this editor last month for disruptive editing. It appears the editor is back and still being disruptive. The editor in the past add unnecessary categories in the charts section for unexplained reasons, like this here. And it look like the editor is evasion their block by using multiple accounts, doing the same thing again as before [4] [5]. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sock account indeffed. IP blocked x 1 week. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Given we are looking at only a couple of vandalism sessions per year I don't see how a three year block of a university IP is justified.©Geni (talk) 03:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Geni: I am basing it on a long history of vandalism despite four previous blocks, the last of which was for a full year and only recently expired. Under the circumstances, I do think it is justified. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Geni: P.S. Thank you for your note. I don't want you to think I am being dismissive. But vandalism from universities is a pervasive problem and long term blocks are not unusual. In this case the vandalism goes back quite a while, and as I noted there have been four previous blocks, the last of which expired four days ago. You can read their block log here. Thank you for your contributions to the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Reporting Calvinopus
Calvinopus (talk · contribs)
This account is only made to add spam in articles and has been warned earlier this month for it. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @TheAmazingPeanuts: Editor indeffed. Thanks for the heads up. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Impeachment trial of Donald Trump on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
User's continued incivility
Hi there! I'm really sorry that I feel the need to involve you in this again, but I don't see how this issue will rectify itself and I really don't want to let it escalate any further. The user Isento (if you remember from a couple weeks ago) continues to be incivil and is sending ridiculing and condescending message to editors, such as here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Isento is also starting edit wars instead of following BRD and resolving the dispute, such as here, here and here. He also put a generic template message on my talk page here in order to aggravate me. I wrote messages on his talk page twice and responded to his message on mine in order to engage with him, but he refused to engage in conversation and continued with the incivil replies in each. He is succeeding in his goal of trying to cause me distress and annoyance and in preventing me from enjoying editing on Wikipedia. I am at a loss for what to do. Bgkc4444 (talk) 10:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Bgkc4444
- @Bgkc4444: I'm sorry, but the diffs you posted are not actionable, either individually or collectively. The article talk is in fact where discussion belongs when dealing with content disputes. This allows other interested parties to join the conversation. If you think they are edit warring, you can take it to WP:3RRN. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. This requires us to work with other editors and handle disagreements w/o taking differences of opinion personally. Finally, please be restrained in posting on their talk page as I asked them to refrain from commenting on yours. (Templates are a generally recognized exception to such requests.) I strongly advise you to discuss disagreements on article talk pages and be sure to cite sources along with the appropriate policies and guidelines. Thank you for your continued contributions to the project... -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)