Arcticocean (talk | contribs) →Disappointment: Response to Deacon. |
Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk | contribs) →Disappointment: re |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
I can't tell you how disappointed I am in your hasty words. Can't really say anything more. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 16:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
I can't tell you how disappointed I am in your hasty words. Can't really say anything more. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 16:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
: You deny that you are an involved administrator where the Eastern Europe subject area is concerned? [[User talk:AGK|AGK]] 16:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
: You deny that you are an involved administrator where the Eastern Europe subject area is concerned? [[User talk:AGK|AGK]] 16:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
The disputes I've been in in this area, the [[Jogaila]] matter (2006) and the [[Boleslaw I's intervention in the Kievan succession crisis, 1018]] in 2008, while they were in the area of Eastern Europe, they were medieval history concerns, and had nothing to do with Jacurek, and the Digwuren case is about article areas I've never even edited in. I would imagine Polish-Russian disputes, Polish-Lithuanian matters and anything with Piotrus, yes, I should stay out of, but Jacurek and Smith, I've got nothing to do with them. I'm quite surprised and really disappointed anybody like yourself has taken issue, though not Radesz. I guess it's one of the things one must suffer occasionally as an admin. :( [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 16:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:19, 8 June 2009
User:Smanu
Thanks for your help on this. I know that 3RR was about to be crossed hence i stopped and instead posted on talk page and the user talk also. (Check the history, he has deleted everything). I hope that a resolution is achieved on this because I'm sure seeing his behaviour that teh user is gonna edit war as soon as the block expires, else I propose the page to be full-protected. :(--Legolas (talk2me) 13:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- You're most welcome. I would note that one can quite easily disruptively edit war without breaking the three-revert rule. 3RR is something of a measuring stick for users to self-regulate their contributions against Wikipedia's edit warring guideline, but I subscribe to the school of thought that 3RR is outdated and ought to be largely ignored in favour of abstaining from any form of reversion without discussion (disruptive edits, BLP violations, unsourced information addition, or vandalism excepted). AGK 13:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Jacurek
This is just to notify you that, per your comment over at User:Jacurek's talk page, I've filed the relevant report over at AE.radek (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notification. I have commented on the complaint. AGK 15:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Disappointment
I can't tell you how disappointed I am in your hasty words. Can't really say anything more. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- You deny that you are an involved administrator where the Eastern Europe subject area is concerned? AGK 16:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
The disputes I've been in in this area, the Jogaila matter (2006) and the Boleslaw I's intervention in the Kievan succession crisis, 1018 in 2008, while they were in the area of Eastern Europe, they were medieval history concerns, and had nothing to do with Jacurek, and the Digwuren case is about article areas I've never even edited in. I would imagine Polish-Russian disputes, Polish-Lithuanian matters and anything with Piotrus, yes, I should stay out of, but Jacurek and Smith, I've got nothing to do with them. I'm quite surprised and really disappointed anybody like yourself has taken issue, though not Radesz. I guess it's one of the things one must suffer occasionally as an admin. :( Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)