76.178.68.210 (talk) No edit summary |
Daniel Case (talk | contribs) →Reply to response: decline latest unblock |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
{{unblock| I didn't do anything wrong. http://www.mlb4u.com/freeagency.php states that these players are currently free agents. The website is updated daily. Yahoo sports stated that Jeff Cirillo had just retired so i tried to change it to a retired player, but i didn't do it correctly. Can you fix that for me? That would be great. http://www.arizonadiamondbacks.com stated that Tony Clark would not be returning next year do the |
{{unblock reviewed|1= I didn't do anything wrong. http://www.mlb4u.com/freeagency.php states that these players are currently free agents. The website is updated daily. Yahoo sports stated that Jeff Cirillo had just retired so i tried to change it to a retired player, but i didn't do it correctly. Can you fix that for me? That would be great. http://www.arizonadiamondbacks.com stated that Tony Clark would not be returning next year do the Chris Burke trade. That is not vandalism. I also edited Bruce Chen because Yahoo sports stated him as a free agent. So please unblock me. This is not vandalism. I got my information from specific sources yahoo and mlb4u.com both websites are run by former MLB players.|decline=First, you are a suspected sockpuppet of a banned user. Second, it seems from your edit history that you continue to add material without citing sources despite repeated entreaties to do so. I do not know whether [[WP:BASEBALL]] considers mlb4u.com to be [[WP:RS|reliable]], but frankly that's immaterial since you are a ''suspected sock of a banned user''. Third, even if you weren't a sock you have been a [[WP:DE|disruptive]] editor, consistently doing it your way and reverting without trying to follow policy and cite reliable sources, even when the information may have been correct. Finally, you have littered this page with multiple unblock requests during previous lengthy blocks, seen every single one of them denied ... and continued to make the exact same edits after the blocks expired, and then gotten blocked again. Are you congenitally incapable of getting a clue? If you follow this up with another unblock request, I strongly advise that not only it be declined but the page be semi-protected to keep you from wasting our time anymore. — [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 16:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 16:24, 18 December 2007
September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ryan O'Hara race car driver, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ryan O'Hara race car driver was changed by 76.178.68.210 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-20T20:31:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 00:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Wikipedia:Abuse reports/76.178.67.45. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 00:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Thanks for experimenting with the page Jeremy Roenick on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Proof: [1] JForget 00:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jeremy Roenick, you will be blocked from editing. JForget 00:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Blocked
As I scrolled your contributions, you've replaced correct birth dates into false. As ones proof [2] from a reliable source Aliyev is born in 1961 not 1960. You are blocked for 24 hours for your repeated alteration of birth dates Thank you!--JForget' 00:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
{{unblock}}.
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I got my info from the CIA website and i think the CIA is smarter than Wikipedia with all due respect JForget
Decline reason:
Its a good idea to source the edits. This one expires in 24 hours, read up on referencing, verifiability, and sourcing. I've added a welcome template with some links you might find helpful. — Navou banter 01:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Just to be on the safe side, could you provide some links which might allow us to verify these claims? Your ability (or, possibly, your lack of ability) to do so would go a long way toward establishing who has the most credible version of events. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Although I don't see JR in the Phoenix Coyotes roster and that the TSN article (see link I left after one of the warnings) says that he signed with the Sharks on September 4 not re-signing with the Coyotes and the other source I left on the president of Azerbaijan was from his website, does a reliable source.--JForget 00:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- And this confirms Karzai is born in 1957 not 1956 and it doesn't seem in the CIA site that there is a place mentionning his birth date inside their pages.--[[User:JForget'JForget' ]] 00:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
The Azerbaijan website is not his it belongs to the Taliban. Oh and on the CIA website you have to go to the external link itself rather than just looking on how the government runs
Explain to me what George W. Bush does wrong and i'll give u my opinion.
October 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jeff Gordon, you will be blocked from editing. Caster23 talk contribs 00:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jimmie Johnson, you will be blocked from editing. Caster23 talk contribs 00:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not forge other users' names on comments. WAVY 10 Fan 16:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ryan O'Hara is a real race car driver and he will be in 1 episode this year. Go to www.mileyworld.com she even tells you that.
Decline reason:
Apart from the questionable changes of figures without citations (which you were blocked for before), you've also been changing birthdates in a number of places. In every case I've looked at so far, your change is contradicted by IMDB and other sources. IMDB may not be a reliable source, but I doubt they and the other first five external links here got it wrong. Find sources for these changes or expect to continue to get blocked for longer and longer periods of time. Subtle vandalism is unacceptable. — chaser - t 01:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
My ip has always been the same.
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I changed the birthdates because it says so on their websites. Wikipedia is not a reliable source because you are able to edit things and i wish you guys would understand that.
Decline reason:
We know Wikipedia is not a reliable source. This does not mean we are happy for you to vandalise Wikipedia. — Yamla 18:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It is not considered vandalism because the information i have entered is correct info. Vandalism is when incorrect information is inserted. www.cia.gov will give you the correct the birth dates i have inserted in those articles. God Bless
Decline reason:
Unless you can provide a specific source, I'm not inclined to believe you, and I'm not wasting hours on a snipe hunt. — Haemo 20:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
WWW.CIA.GOV is the specific source you just need to got there!!!!
Decline reason:
That is not a specific source; I'm talking a link I can click and see the date immediately, without looking around. — Haemo 20:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{| The CIA website says when those people are born. Are you saying the CIA is stupid??}}
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to April 21, you will be blocked from editing. Fake info, continuation of reason blocked in first place. NrDg 17:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What is wrong with talking on Miley Cyrus's talk page? All i said was maybe we should get a new picture. Talking about improvements to the article isn't considered vandalism. Or is it?
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
lol i didn't even do that probably my vandal little brother did that.
Decline reason:
This is no grounds for an unblock. — Yamla 17:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
November 2007
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Aaron Tippin. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 15:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Next (film), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NrDg 18:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Albert II of Belgium, you will be blocked from editing. Danthemankhan 06:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Dreadstar † 06:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I got my information from his website and i noticed that wikipedia has the incorrect info so i added the correct info and now i get blocked for being correct which is ironic. Unblock me this is ridiculous.
Accept reason:
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So what you are saying is being untruthful to the public is the right thing to do??
Decline reason:
Unblock has already been declined with an appropriate reason, a reason which has been explained to you many, many times already on this talk page. Please, do not make any more unblock requests. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Reply to response
Unless you cite your changes properly, they will be reverted. One more instance of this and I will report you to the proper authorities. -MBK004 05:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Dreadstar † 06:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
76.178.68.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't do anything wrong. http://www.mlb4u.com/freeagency.php states that these players are currently free agents. The website is updated daily. Yahoo sports stated that Jeff Cirillo had just retired so i tried to change it to a retired player, but i didn't do it correctly. Can you fix that for me? That would be great. http://www.arizonadiamondbacks.com stated that Tony Clark would not be returning next year do the Chris Burke trade. That is not vandalism. I also edited Bruce Chen because Yahoo sports stated him as a free agent. So please unblock me. This is not vandalism. I got my information from specific sources yahoo and mlb4u.com both websites are run by former MLB players.
Decline reason:
First, you are a suspected sockpuppet of a banned user. Second, it seems from your edit history that you continue to add material without citing sources despite repeated entreaties to do so. I do not know whether WP:BASEBALL considers mlb4u.com to be reliable, but frankly that's immaterial since you are a suspected sock of a banned user. Third, even if you weren't a sock you have been a disruptive editor, consistently doing it your way and reverting without trying to follow policy and cite reliable sources, even when the information may have been correct. Finally, you have littered this page with multiple unblock requests during previous lengthy blocks, seen every single one of them denied ... and continued to make the exact same edits after the blocks expired, and then gotten blocked again. Are you congenitally incapable of getting a clue? If you follow this up with another unblock request, I strongly advise that not only it be declined but the page be semi-protected to keep you from wasting our time anymore. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.