fix error |
Is this not a threat and a violation of talk page policy? |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<span style="position:absolute;top:-65px;left:-180px;z-index:100">[[File:Flag-globe-2.gif|Flag-globe-195|180px]]</span> |
<span style="position:absolute;top:-65px;left:-180px;z-index:100">[[File:Flag-globe-2.gif|Flag-globe-195|180px]]</span> |
||
== A suggestion == |
|||
== April 2018 == |
== April 2018 == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Ruger P-Series]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 18:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Ruger P-Series]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 18:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> |
||
Line 10: | Line 8: | ||
:::There is a open talk page discussion here[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ruger_P-Series&diff=prev&oldid=833823249].[[User:72bikers|72bikers]] ([[User talk:72bikers#top|talk]]) 18:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC) |
:::There is a open talk page discussion here[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ruger_P-Series&diff=prev&oldid=833823249].[[User:72bikers|72bikers]] ([[User talk:72bikers#top|talk]]) 18:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
::::Also these editors have been trying to circumvent consensus on gun articles by trying to claim that somehow the controversial content is bringing a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]] to the article |
::::Also these editors have been trying to circumvent consensus on gun articles by trying to claim that somehow the controversial content is bringing a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]] to the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ruger_P-Series&diff=833823249&oldid=833823028].[[User:72bikers|72bikers]] ([[User talk:72bikers#top|talk]]) 18:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
::::You violated [[WP:3RR]]. You didn't take the chance to explain yourself. You were blocked. The block is perfectly in line with policy. Now, please explain your consensus assertion as I am weighing whether or not to topic ban you. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 18:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC) |
::::You violated [[WP:3RR]]. You didn't take the chance to explain yourself. You were blocked. The block is perfectly in line with policy. Now, please explain your consensus assertion as I am weighing whether or not to topic ban you. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 18:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
[[U|Springee]] thank you for your levelheaded comment.[[User:72bikers|72bikers]] ([[User talk:72bikers#top|talk]]) 19:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC) |
[[U|Springee]] thank you for your levelheaded comment.[[User:72bikers|72bikers]] ([[User talk:72bikers#top|talk]]) 19:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
In all honesty I needed to take a step back as some editors were pushing all my buttons and got under my skin. That led me to make rash and huried decisions. Taking a step back was exactly what I needed. I see now why some editors ask admins for a voluntary block. I let the drama consume me. Though this is just volunteer work I do enjoin bringing knowledge to others and also in that process finding knowledge myself. |
|||
Whith all that said I don't see how this could be construed as anything other than a threat. I point out this was made after he was asked to stay off my talk page which would be a second violation as well. '''You insist on removing my posts ''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72bikers&diff=prev&oldid=833851713|off] {{blue|(my edit summary-Stay off my talk page this should take place on the noticeboard)}} '''that are on this topic - your conduct. Do you really want me to go to a notice board to get you sanctioned while you can't edit the notice board? ''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72bikers&diff=833853361&oldid=833852878]by editor Legacypac. I do not think he understands Wiki policy that allows any editor to remove anything they wish on there own talk page. |
|||
He even tried to get me band by claiming I was making sock accounts. '''Take a look at the recent deletions from 72bikers talk.'''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72bikers&diff=prev&oldid=833851713]{{blue|(my edit summary-Stay off my talk page this should take place on the noticeboard)}} after his threat [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72bikers&diff=833853361&oldid=833852878] '''Several editors have been documenting toward an almost certain topic ban.'''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NeilN&diff=833854417&oldid=83384749] Him again claiming my comment {{blue|(my edit summary-Stay off my talk page this should take place on the noticeboard)}} when being harassed on my talk page by Legacypac. |
|||
==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== |
==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== |
Revision as of 23:33, 6 April 2018
April 2018
![Stop icon with clock](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN talk to me 18:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Where is this consensus you're referring to here? --NeilN talk to me 18:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- There is a open talk page discussion here[1].72bikers (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Also these editors have been trying to circumvent consensus on gun articles by trying to claim that somehow the controversial content is bringing a Neutral point of view to the article [2].72bikers (talk) 18:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- There is a open talk page discussion here[1].72bikers (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- You violated WP:3RR. You didn't take the chance to explain yourself. You were blocked. The block is perfectly in line with policy. Now, please explain your consensus assertion as I am weighing whether or not to topic ban you. --NeilN talk to me 18:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- You don't even give me chance to speak.72bikers (talk) 18:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- You were notified of the edit warring report and you were invited separately to comment there. You ignored that. Now, I'm giving you the chance to speak again. For the third and last time, please explain your consensus comment. If you don't provide a satisfactory explanation, you're probably looking at additional editing restrictions. --NeilN talk to me 18:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- You don't even give me chance to speak.72bikers (talk) 18:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- 72bikers, as I said before, I understand your POV but it was edit warring and the hostile edit summaries are also not going to win any assumptions of good faith. The 72hr block isn't that long and I think the odds of getting a reversal are low. Let it slide. Springee (talk) 20:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Springee thank you for your levelheaded comment.72bikers (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
In all honesty I needed to take a step back as some editors were pushing all my buttons and got under my skin. That led me to make rash and huried decisions. Taking a step back was exactly what I needed. I see now why some editors ask admins for a voluntary block. I let the drama consume me. Though this is just volunteer work I do enjoin bringing knowledge to others and also in that process finding knowledge myself.
Whith all that said I don't see how this could be construed as anything other than a threat. I point out this was made after he was asked to stay off my talk page which would be a second violation as well. You insist on removing my posts [3] (my edit summary-Stay off my talk page this should take place on the noticeboard) that are on this topic - your conduct. Do you really want me to go to a notice board to get you sanctioned while you can't edit the notice board? [4]by editor Legacypac. I do not think he understands Wiki policy that allows any editor to remove anything they wish on there own talk page.
He even tried to get me band by claiming I was making sock accounts. Take a look at the recent deletions from 72bikers talk.[5](my edit summary-Stay off my talk page this should take place on the noticeboard) after his threat [6] Several editors have been documenting toward an almost certain topic ban.[7] Him again claiming my comment (my edit summary-Stay off my talk page this should take place on the noticeboard) when being harassed on my talk page by Legacypac.
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are banned for three months from making more than one revert per 24 hours (WP:1RR) on any page related to "gun control" including governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues.
You have been sanctioned for disruptive editing and edit summaries in the topic area.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. NeilN talk to me 19:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)