Your IP address has been blocked from editing because it has been used to evade a previous block. (TW) |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
: ''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]] and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]]''. |
: ''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]] and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]]''. |
||
<!-- Template:uw-ipevadeblock --> |
<!-- Template:uw-ipevadeblock --> |
||
*{{U|John "Hannibal" Smith}}, I always appreciate the Recent changes patrolling, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassination%20of%20Andrei%20Karlov&diff=755761834 this edit] was justified. Sure, they should have given an edit summary, but it behooves ''you'', as a rollbacker/vandal fighter/whatever, to look more closely before you revert and warn. That unwarranted speculation simply had to go. Please be much more careful next time--and {{U|K6ka}}, the same may apply to you. <p>IP, you need to get your ass in gear and your act together. Stop socking, come clean, fess up, and come back in the fold. There's some people will put in a good word for you, but the longer you keep this up the fewer supporters you will have. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 04:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:00, 20 December 2016
Sockpuppet investigation
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Parsley Man, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Assassination of Andrei Karlov have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Assassination of Andrei Karlov, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 01:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Could you explain why you removed my content on the Assassination of Andrei Karlov? BernardZ (talk)
It was speculation. Another person agreed with me on that.
![Stop icon with clock](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Drmies (talk) 03:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
- John "Hannibal" Smith, I always appreciate the Recent changes patrolling, but this edit was justified. Sure, they should have given an edit summary, but it behooves you, as a rollbacker/vandal fighter/whatever, to look more closely before you revert and warn. That unwarranted speculation simply had to go. Please be much more careful next time--and K6ka, the same may apply to you.
IP, you need to get your ass in gear and your act together. Stop socking, come clean, fess up, and come back in the fold. There's some people will put in a good word for you, but the longer you keep this up the fewer supporters you will have. Drmies (talk) 04:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)