→Balkans: section title |
NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) You have been temporarily blocked from editing. (TW) |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#|{{{thread}}}]]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic {{#ifexist:[[:{{{1}}}]]|[[:{{{1}}}]]|{{{1}}}}}.}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Polargeo|Polargeo]] ([[User talk:Polargeo|talk]]) 16:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC) |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#|{{{thread}}}]]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic {{#ifexist:[[:{{{1}}}]]|[[:{{{1}}}]]|{{{1}}}}}.}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Polargeo|Polargeo]] ([[User talk:Polargeo|talk]]) 16:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
== February 2010 == |
|||
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for '''[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Иван Богданов|attempting to impersonate another user]] who you are in a direct conflict with'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. '''<font color="navy">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 23:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> |
Revision as of 23:58, 24 February 2010
Dates
Hello, I just noticed your article Sava Grujić. On the English Wiki we don't link dates like day, month and year (see WP:MOSNUM. I know this is done elsewhere but not here. Just to let you know. Happy editing, De728631 (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- I came here to say the same thing. Also, we don't link fragments (such as month-day or just the year). If you have any questions, let me know. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Albert Camille Vital. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
English Wikipedia
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. It is a mistake to think that communications in English Wikipedia are private conversations. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Non-free images on templates
A number of times now (examples: [1][2]) you have placed non-free images on templates. Per WP:NFCC #9, the use of such images on templates is not permitted. Please do not place non-free images on templates. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Undiscussed changes
Please do not engage in edit warring over these edits. Once you are reverted, discuss the matter on the article talkpage. Simply reentering your edit will not make its stick. 1) "Kingdom of Yugoslavia" is the term used on Wikipedia for the state that was also named "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes". 2) When he became President of the Presidency Janez Drnovšek was an independent politician, to the best of my knowledge (and this is how he was originally listed), please source your claim that he was an SKJ member. 3) Please do not move pages without a proper move proposal and a discussion. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 16:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm so tired of abrasive users and IPs its refreshing to talk to somebody reasonable. :)
- 1) Resolved.
- 2) All I'm asking is can you source his membership in the SKJ during the 1989-1990 period? I know the SFRY was still a one-party state, but the article does not state he was a member of another party - but none. However, I must admit I'm unsure about this, so I guess I'm ok with "SKJ until proven otherwise" rather than vice versa.
- 3) I understand, but I think it would be more appropriate to rename the article into "President of Yugoslavia" and creating a new "King of Yugoslavia" article, rather than turning them all into lists - there are no main articles on these subjects. (List of leaders of SFR Yugoslavia will most likely be merged into the "President of Yugoslavia", "Prime Minister of Yugoslavia", and "League of Communists of Yugoslavia" articles.) --DIREKTOR (TALK) 19:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Kingdom or socialist State?
Hi Иван Богданов, I'd like your opinion about a problem here: Template talk:Politics of Yugoslavia. Thanks.--95.236.141.237 (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Per your comments at WP:ANI
I would draw your attention to my response at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#WikiClique. Either start a process, be it a sockpuppet investigation or dispute resolution, or do not comment upon other editors without providing evidence in the manner of diffs. You may regard this as an official warning. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Thankyou
Hi Иван Богданов, thankyou for creating the FRY page, S&M and FRY are not the same thing ! Liebe Grußen, Craigzomack, 19:39, 21 February 2010 (CET)
Edit warring
Please stop edit warring on Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Prime Minister of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Military of Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Serbia and Montenegro and Template:Politics of Yugoslavia.
Across the five articles, you and DIREKTOR (talk · contribs) are edit warring, and I won't tolerate it. There are numerous dispute resolution methods, I suggest you use them before you get blocked. Thanks. GedUK 14:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Stop the edit war?
Facts: 1) We will both get blocked if we don't stop edit-warring. 2) One of us should stop reverting. Who? 3) You are introducing new edits that have been reverted and are opposed. Discussion is on.
To put it simply, since you are the one introducing new edits to the articles, you are the party expected to cease for the moment and start discussing properly. Or at least, if this were a civilized "region" of Wikipedia, instead of the Balkans, this is what would be generally expected. In short: don't edit-war to push a new edit, especially if you know it is opposed, especially if you have been reverted repeatedly, and especially if discussion is on and arguments have been presented (such as sources, policy, WP:MoS, WP:CFORK, etc.).
Look at it from my perspective: You start undioing and editing my hard work en masse, you edit-war to keep your edits in, and then you ask me politely to stop edit-warring since you'll get blocked? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 10:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
"Where is the consensus to remove my work"?
Another thing I thought you should be aware of before we enter into serious discussion: edits which are a product of consensus usually require consensus to be removed. Edits which are not a product of consensus, i.e. unilateral edits such as all your recent ones, DO NOT require consensus to be removed. Hence, it is nonsense to unilaterally edit, and then claim the edit cannot be removed because the other party "does not have consensus". [3] (Besides, WP:CFORK is policy and supercedes consensus.) --DIREKTOR (TALK) 11:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Balkans
"The Balkans area of wikipedia is generally uncivilized." Polargeo (talk)
- That is me saying it. There is no gain admonishing DIREKTOR for a general observation. Wikipedia have chosen to put special sanctions in place. Using Template:Uw-balkans as a warning, which looks like this
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you. Polargeo (talk) 15:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
ANI notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Polargeo (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NW (Talk) 23:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)