Doc glasgow (talk | contribs) unblocking see talk |
i have just as much right to a user page as you do |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Please do not [censor] my [censored] page anymore; thank you Wikipedia [censored], one and all.''' |
|||
I am [censored], [censoring] my own user page; this is my favourite page, because it is my [censored] page. |
|||
QOTD, "Some Wikipedians are more [censored] than others. Others are allowed to [[Wikipedia:Be_bold|be bold]] and to [[Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules|ignore all rules]]. This is an example of sheer [censorcy]." |
|||
---- |
|||
I do [censored] like the Wikipedia and think it is run by a [censored] administration, composed of [censored] bureaucrats and [censored] [censoreds]. I [censored] the allegations made against me, and was [censored] given every chance to defend myself against the lengthy list of [censored] "evidence". As my [censored] politically-motivated ban has now ended (and let's all remember that stating [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Snowspinner&diff=7699657&oldid=7699460| I have three sockpuppets in a censored tree]" was considered a bannable offense), and as I am now reinstated as a user with full [censored] rights and priviliges*, I would appreciate it if the [censoreds] would stop [censoring] me and my [censored] upporters, and I certainly see no reason for the [censoreds] to continually revert my [censored] edits. |
|||
I remind everyone that my [censored] ban was repeatedly opposed by several members of the [censoring] arbitration committe, that 8% of the [censored] Wikipedia community actually voted to elect me to said committee, that I was a prolific and productive editor for many years across thousands of [censored] articles, and that the evidence against me is [censored] conclusive; furthermore, having personally met [censored], and having read his [censored] fiction, I understand that his credibility in the community has been much [censored] over the past 18 months. Ultimately, it would seem that one should not be so quick to believe what one's [censoring] government asserts, especially when that government is a wiki-government of appointed [censoreds] and anonymous [censoreds]. Please do remember that this is the very same community which embraced a [censored] professor at the highest levels, and which clearly does [censored] have a history of idyllic honesty (these being two [censored] observations which should certainly raise some [censored] logical suspicions in your [censored] mind about how accurate and reasonable the [censored] charges against me truly were). |
|||
Indeed, the most [censored] evidence against me is now 5 years old, and amounts to swearing and edit-warring during a period of time when both swearing and endless edit-warring were both explicitly permitted by the likes of [censored], [censored], and [censored], all of whom frequently engaged in similar [censored] behavior themselves! I therefore assert that my true crime was daring to argue with the [censorers] during their formative years, and that subsequently they have waged an incessantly one-sided and [censored] campaign to discredit and [censor] me (both at Wikipedia, other internet sites, and in real-life), because (quite simply) they are [censored], [censored], [censored], and [censoredly] [censored] [censoring] [censoreds] with no regard for the [censored] constitutional processes which earlier [censored] wiki-citizens attempted to implement. |
|||
Furthermore, although it may sound rather [censored] to observe this, I did actually win roughly 90% of my edit wars, which indicates that the true [censoreds] were those who opposed me, since the '[censored] majority' has clearly never had a problem with me or my [censored] edits. |
|||
---- |
|||
All power to the [censored]! Sic semper [censored]!!! |
|||
''and my stapler, somebody took my [censored] stapler...'' |
|||
<center>[[image:1984_Social_Classes_alt.svg]] |
|||
Explanation for [censored] people: [Censor] --> [Censors] --> [Censoreds] --> [Censored] Common Users Who Do All the Work... See the [censored]? |
|||
For more details on how Wikipedia actually works, be sure to read the famous [censored] novel: ''[[Animal Farm|Censor Farm]]'' |
|||
Another excellent treatise on these issues is the influential work: ''[[On Liberty|On Censored]]'' |
|||
''*some [censored] restrictions may apply'' |
Revision as of 01:08, 8 March 2008
Please do not [censor] my [censored] page anymore; thank you Wikipedia [censored], one and all.
I am [censored], [censoring] my own user page; this is my favourite page, because it is my [censored] page.
QOTD, "Some Wikipedians are more [censored] than others. Others are allowed to be bold and to ignore all rules. This is an example of sheer [censorcy]."
I do [censored] like the Wikipedia and think it is run by a [censored] administration, composed of [censored] bureaucrats and [censored] [censoreds]. I [censored] the allegations made against me, and was [censored] given every chance to defend myself against the lengthy list of [censored] "evidence". As my [censored] politically-motivated ban has now ended (and let's all remember that stating I have three sockpuppets in a censored tree" was considered a bannable offense), and as I am now reinstated as a user with full [censored] rights and priviliges*, I would appreciate it if the [censoreds] would stop [censoring] me and my [censored] upporters, and I certainly see no reason for the [censoreds] to continually revert my [censored] edits.
I remind everyone that my [censored] ban was repeatedly opposed by several members of the [censoring] arbitration committe, that 8% of the [censored] Wikipedia community actually voted to elect me to said committee, that I was a prolific and productive editor for many years across thousands of [censored] articles, and that the evidence against me is [censored] conclusive; furthermore, having personally met [censored], and having read his [censored] fiction, I understand that his credibility in the community has been much [censored] over the past 18 months. Ultimately, it would seem that one should not be so quick to believe what one's [censoring] government asserts, especially when that government is a wiki-government of appointed [censoreds] and anonymous [censoreds]. Please do remember that this is the very same community which embraced a [censored] professor at the highest levels, and which clearly does [censored] have a history of idyllic honesty (these being two [censored] observations which should certainly raise some [censored] logical suspicions in your [censored] mind about how accurate and reasonable the [censored] charges against me truly were).
Indeed, the most [censored] evidence against me is now 5 years old, and amounts to swearing and edit-warring during a period of time when both swearing and endless edit-warring were both explicitly permitted by the likes of [censored], [censored], and [censored], all of whom frequently engaged in similar [censored] behavior themselves! I therefore assert that my true crime was daring to argue with the [censorers] during their formative years, and that subsequently they have waged an incessantly one-sided and [censored] campaign to discredit and [censor] me (both at Wikipedia, other internet sites, and in real-life), because (quite simply) they are [censored], [censored], [censored], and [censoredly] [censored] [censoring] [censoreds] with no regard for the [censored] constitutional processes which earlier [censored] wiki-citizens attempted to implement.
Furthermore, although it may sound rather [censored] to observe this, I did actually win roughly 90% of my edit wars, which indicates that the true [censoreds] were those who opposed me, since the '[censored] majority' has clearly never had a problem with me or my [censored] edits.
All power to the [censored]! Sic semper [censored]!!! and my stapler, somebody took my [censored] stapler...
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/1984_Social_Classes_alt.svg/613px-1984_Social_Classes_alt.svg.png)
Explanation for [censored] people: [Censor] --> [Censors] --> [Censoreds] --> [Censored] Common Users Who Do All the Work... See the [censored]?
For more details on how Wikipedia actually works, be sure to read the famous [censored] novel: Censor Farm
Another excellent treatise on these issues is the influential work: On Censored
*some [censored] restrictions may apply