William M. Connolley (talk | contribs) mv to talk |
81.77.230.46 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{coor title dms|55|40|43.28|N|9|34|2.49|E|type:landmark_region:DK_}} |
{{coor title dms|55|40|43.28|N|9|34|2.49|E|type:landmark_region:DK_}} |
||
====Wikimedia warning==== |
|||
User Kim Dabelstein Petersen is warned not to insert libelous material in biographical entries. |
|||
== Alexa bias == |
== Alexa bias == |
Revision as of 23:09, 7 August 2007
Personal data
|
55°40′43.28″N 9°34′2.49″E / 55.6786889°N 9.5673583°E
Wikimedia warning
User Kim Dabelstein Petersen is warned not to insert libelous material in biographical entries.
Alexa bias
Hi. I have no problem with your edit to Climate Audit to remove Alexa stats. I'm just curious, why are they biased for science sites? Thanks. Crust 14:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Because its biased towards IE users, the scientific community has a larger than usual proportion of "other" browsers , and are less prone to include a plugin like Alexa (the last is my own conjecture) - See the Alexa page for this Kim D. Petersen 16:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. That makes a lot of sense. Crust 16:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Monckton anti-article: Devil's Advocate section
Hi Kim,
- I'm not sure it makes sense to edit within the Devil's Advocate section. That was intended for Edward to point out those sections in Monckton's article that he, as an open-minded but not specifically knowledgeable reader, found convincing. It's a heads-up to those who are working on composing the anti-article. The point of his recording that is to make sure that, when working on relevant sections of the anti-article, that these points are innoculated against.
- The general plan, so far, seems to be: At the main page, get the anti-backgrounder fixed up, as this will provide the material for the anti-article. Then write up the anti-article. (There is actually a 2nd article, and a rejoinder in The Guardian; but if we can do the backgrounder and first article before, the others are relatively easy.)
Nealjking 23:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Help needed
Hi Kim,
- There are certain areas where some input would be good. I'm thinking of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dbuckner/climate user page/DRAFT RESPONSE to Monckton's backgrounder, the topics:
- Did rising carbon-dioxide end the Ice Age?
- By how much have global temperatures..
- By how much has sea level..
Some of this stuff requires expert attention, and at some point I plan to haul out a chunk and throw it into the mix at: http://tamino.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/monckton-part-1/
Nealjking 02:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
The DRAFT RESPONSE to Monckton's backgrounder is now at Apocalypse Cancelled
Defaultsort
Hi1 This is a magic word, not a template, so please use a colon instead of a pipe: Thanks! :-) Flatterworld 23:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)