Ihardlythinkso (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ihardlythinkso (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Style 1A – main line |
==Style 1A – horizontal main line, no indents== |
||
'''1. e4 e5 2. f4''' |
'''1. e4 e5 2. f4''' |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
||
==Style 1B – mail line |
==Style 1B – horizontal mail line, annotations indented== |
||
'''1. e4 e5 2. f4''' |
'''1. e4 e5 2. f4''' |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
:Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
:Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
||
==Style 1C – main line |
==Style 1C – horizontal main line, main line indented== |
||
:'''1. e4 e5 2. f4''' |
:'''1. e4 e5 2. f4''' |
||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
||
==Style 2A – main line |
==Style 2A – vertical main line, no indents== |
||
'''1. e4 e5''' <br/> |
'''1. e4 e5''' <br/> |
||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
||
==Style 2B – main line |
==Style 2B – vertical main line, annotations indented== |
||
'''1. e4 e5''' <br/> |
'''1. e4 e5''' <br/> |
||
Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
:Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
:Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky. |
||
==Style 2C – main line |
==Style 2C – vertical main line, main line indented== |
||
:'''1. e4 e5''' |
:'''1. e4 e5''' |
Revision as of 08:25, 31 July 2011
Style 1A – horizontal main line, no indents
1. e4 e5 2. f4
This is the King's Gambit: Anderssen offers his pawn in exchange for faster development. Although this was a common opening in the nineteenth century, it is less common today, as defensive techniques have improved since Anderssen's time.
2... exf4
Kieseritzky accepts the gambit; this variant is thus called the King's Gambit Accepted.
3. Bc4 Qh4+
The Bishop's Gambit. Black's move will force White to move his king and White will not be able to castle, but this move also places Black's queen in peril, and White can eventually attack it with gain of tempo with Ng1–f3.
4. Kf1 b5?!
This is the Bryan Counter-gambit, deeply analysed by Kieseritzky, and which sometimes bears his name. It is not considered a sound move by most players today.
5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3
This is a common developing move, but in addition the knight attacks Black's queen, forcing Black to move it instead of developing his own side.
6... Qh6 7. d3
With this move, White solidifies control of the critical center of the board. German grandmaster Robert Hübner recommends 7. Nc3 instead.
7... Nh5
This move threatens Ng3+, and protects the pawn at f4, but it also sidelines the knight to a poor position at the edge of the board, where knights are the least powerful.
8. Nh4 Qg5
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky.
Style 1B – horizontal mail line, annotations indented
1. e4 e5 2. f4
- This is the King's Gambit: Anderssen offers his pawn in exchange for faster development. Although this was a common opening in the nineteenth century, it is less common today, as defensive techniques have improved since Anderssen's time.
2... exf4
- Kieseritzky accepts the gambit; this variant is thus called the King's Gambit Accepted.
3. Bc4 Qh4+
- The Bishop's Gambit. Black's move will force White to move his king and White will not be able to castle, but this move also places Black's queen in peril, and White can eventually attack it with gain of tempo with Ng1–f3.
4. Kf1 b5?!
- This is the Bryan Counter-gambit, deeply analysed by Kieseritzky, and which sometimes bears his name. It is not considered a sound move by most players today.
5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3
- This is a common developing move, but in addition the knight attacks Black's queen, forcing Black to move it instead of developing his own side.
6... Qh6 7. d3
- With this move, White solidifies control of the critical center of the board. German grandmaster Robert Hübner recommends 7. Nc3 instead.
7... Nh5
- This move threatens Ng3+, and protects the pawn at f4, but it also sidelines the knight to a poor position at the edge of the board, where knights are the least powerful.
8. Nh4 Qg5
- Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky.
Style 1C – horizontal main line, main line indented
- 1. e4 e5 2. f4
This is the King's Gambit: Anderssen offers his pawn in exchange for faster development. Although this was a common opening in the nineteenth century, it is less common today, as defensive techniques have improved since Anderssen's time.
- 2... exf4
Kieseritzky accepts the gambit; this variant is thus called the King's Gambit Accepted.
- 3. Bc4 Qh4+
The Bishop's Gambit. Black's move will force White to move his king and White will not be able to castle, but this move also places Black's queen in peril, and White can eventually attack it with gain of tempo with Ng1–f3.
- 4. Kf1 b5?!
This is the Bryan Counter-gambit, deeply analysed by Kieseritzky, and which sometimes bears his name. It is not considered a sound move by most players today.
- 5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3
This is a common developing move, but in addition the knight attacks Black's queen, forcing Black to move it instead of developing his own side.
- 6... Qh6 7. d3
With this move, White solidifies control of the critical center of the board. German grandmaster Robert Hübner recommends 7. Nc3 instead.
- 7... Nh5
This move threatens Ng3+, and protects the pawn at f4, but it also sidelines the knight to a poor position at the edge of the board, where knights are the least powerful.
- 8. Nh4 Qg5
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky.
Style 2A – vertical main line, no indents
1. e4 e5
2. f4
This is the King's Gambit: Anderssen offers his pawn in exchange for faster development. Although this was a common opening in the nineteenth century, it is less common today, as defensive techniques have improved since Anderssen's time.
2... exf4
Kieseritzky accepts the gambit; this variant is thus called the King's Gambit Accepted.
3. Bc4 Qh4+
The Bishop's Gambit. Black's move will force White to move his king and White will not be able to castle, but this move also places Black's queen in peril, and White can eventually attack it with gain of tempo with Ng1–f3.
4. Kf1 b5?!
This is the Bryan Counter-gambit, deeply analysed by Kieseritzky, and which sometimes bears his name. It is not considered a sound move by most players today.
5. Bxb5 Nf6
6. Nf3
This is a common developing move, but in addition the knight attacks Black's queen, forcing Black to move it instead of developing his own side.
6... Qh6
7. d3
With this move, White solidifies control of the critical center of the board. German grandmaster Robert Hübner recommends 7. Nc3 instead.
7... Nh5
This move threatens Ng3+, and protects the pawn at f4, but it also sidelines the knight to a poor position at the edge of the board, where knights are the least powerful.
8. Nh4 Qg5
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky.
Style 2B – vertical main line, annotations indented
1. e4 e5
2. f4
- This is the King's Gambit: Anderssen offers his pawn in exchange for faster development. Although this was a common opening in the nineteenth century, it is less common today, as defensive techniques have improved since Anderssen's time.
2... exf4
- Kieseritzky accepts the gambit; this variant is thus called the King's Gambit Accepted.
3. Bc4 Qh4+
- The Bishop's Gambit. Black's move will force White to move his king and White will not be able to castle, but this move also places Black's queen in peril, and White can eventually attack it with gain of tempo with Ng1–f3.
4. Kf1 b5?!
- This is the Bryan Counter-gambit, deeply analysed by Kieseritzky, and which sometimes bears his name. It is not considered a sound move by most players today.
5. Bxb5 Nf6
6. Nf3
- This is a common developing move, but in addition the knight attacks Black's queen, forcing Black to move it instead of developing his own side.
6... Qh6
7. d3
- With this move, White solidifies control of the critical center of the board. German grandmaster Robert Hübner recommends 7. Nc3 instead.
7... Nh5
- This move threatens Ng3+, and protects the pawn at f4, but it also sidelines the knight to a poor position at the edge of the board, where knights are the least powerful.
8. Nh4 Qg5
- Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky.
Style 2C – vertical main line, main line indented
- 1. e4 e5
- 2. f4
This is the King's Gambit: Anderssen offers his pawn in exchange for faster development. Although this was a common opening in the nineteenth century, it is less common today, as defensive techniques have improved since Anderssen's time.
- 2... exf4
Kieseritzky accepts the gambit; this variant is thus called the King's Gambit Accepted.
- 3. Bc4 Qh4+
The Bishop's Gambit. Black's move will force White to move his king and White will not be able to castle, but this move also places Black's queen in peril, and White can eventually attack it with gain of tempo with Ng1–f3.
- 4. Kf1 b5?!
This is the Bryan Counter-gambit, deeply analysed by Kieseritzky, and which sometimes bears his name. It is not considered a sound move by most players today.
- 5. Bxb5 Nf6
- 6. Nf3
This is a common developing move, but in addition the knight attacks Black's queen, forcing Black to move it instead of developing his own side.
- 6... Qh6
- 7. d3
With this move, White solidifies control of the critical center of the board. German grandmaster Robert Hübner recommends 7. Nc3 instead.
- 7... Nh5
This move threatens Ng3+, and protects the pawn at f4, but it also sidelines the knight to a poor position at the edge of the board, where knights are the least powerful.
- 8. Nh4 Qg5
Better was 8. ... g6, according to Kieseritzky