Biosthmors (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
added Category:Wikipedia deletion sorting using HotCat |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
*[[User:Biosthmors/Projects|Projects]] |
*[[User:Biosthmors/Projects|Projects]] |
||
*[[User:Biosthmors/Talks|Talks]] |
*[[User:Biosthmors/Talks|Talks]] |
||
[[Category:Wikipedia deletion sorting|User]] |
Latest revision as of 16:03, 25 March 2014
- My editing philosophy
Welcome to my Wikipedia user page. My real name isn't "Biosthmors", which is just a rearrangment of the letters in the word thrombosis. I edit Wikipedia and you can too. I don't think it is difficult. I think we should focus most of our efforts on improving existing articles, instead of starting new ones. I want every Wikipedia article to follow our neutral point of view policy, especially the articles that I think raise the most important issues of our time. Access to factual, unbiased information is essential for forming an engaged public. Thankfully, on Wikipedia engaging in any sort of advocacy, slant, or spin is forbidden. If you have any questions, concerns, or feedback, please feel free to contact me or by email.[but email works only if you're logged in, and setting up an account is easy]
If you want check my edits to see if I am slanting any article towards any point of view, I'll explain some of my beliefs: I see money in politics as the big issue of our time. I wonder why the word socioeconomic exists but politicoeconomic is not in our vocabulary. I happen to like this video, which gives a global/U.K. view, and this video, which gives a U.S. perspective. My view on the Wikipedia–Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) dynamic as I see it is described here. According to Bernie Sanders, the 300 richest own as much as the poorest 3,000,000,000.[1] I don't see the wisdom in this. So I wonder if Wikipedia might—if it were as good as it could be—make the world a more just place?
As for other groups of people around the world, I think all the faces here are attractive (well except for one). As for other sentient beings, I think dolphins and whales should have human rights (unless you're an Inuit hunting with pre-Industrial Revolution tools). Why do I bother mentioning all of this? Because I want you to know that I see editing Wikipedia as one method we might take more responsibility for the world around us—and as an effect, improve social and environmental health.
- My views on the owner of the domain
My other Wikipedia–WMF views are as follows: I am strongly pro-paid editing and strongly anti-advocacy/pro-neutrality. I want the WMF to keep metrics on editor retention of experienced editors. The WMF Board of Trustees has three community representatives, but I think they—SJ, Phoebe, and Raystorm—might represent a wmf:chapter perspective that is orthogonal to the community interest. I don't think that the chapters as a whole should be considered a part of the community. Some chapters are paid bureaucracies, and I'm not sure they add any reasonable value (especially in terms of dollars spent) for readers. In other words, I think that the way we select board seats could be influenced by probably hundreds and hundreds of votes from people who think they have something to gain, like money or travel. (I've received funds for travel from the WMF and I've been very thankful for it. I've tried to give back to the community to prove that this was a good investment of resources.) This is similar to what Sue said.
I care about this politicoeconomical influence because I think it limits the options available for effective governance of the WMF. Wikipedia is in a crisis. It has previously fallen on Alexa page rankings from #5 to #8. We need good governance, oversight, and effective investment of community resources to end the crisis. We should try to be the the world's #1 internet destination. Also, I wish the WMF would publish metrics similar to what Alexa uses, like bounce rate, daily page views per visitor, and daily time on site. What are the historical trends on those numbers?
Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit—not the encyclopedia you can abuse to force anyone to edit. Therefore, I feel that the WMF should never influence instructors to force students to edit other than inside Wikipedia sandboxes. Unskilled, uninformed, and untrained students being forced by ignorant instructors to edit Wikipedia articles is one of the worst things about the education program. In my opinion, this forced editing results from the WMF using a bad metric: quantity. However, a quantity-focused approach is not how the English Wikipedia developed—nor is it what the community wants—so pursuing this strategy to build the encyclopedia in English or any other language seems very ill-advised.
- My potential conflicts of interest
- I have an interest in Vanguard and in the performance of VTSMX and VGTSX with an eye towards increasing shareholder value (and dividend payments) for corporations in those indecies, which might involve the reduction of executive pay
- Groups I appreciate include the Sunlight Foundation, Transparency International, and Amnesty International; if these groups have their way, they might reduce some level of shareholder value (please note the apparent contradiction with the first bullet point)
- I have a potential conflict of interest with the topic Suburban Express, but not a real one, because all I want is for the wise application of NPOV and RS to win out
- I want the Democratic party to win the Senate seat in the 2014 Georgia election because I still think what Saxby Chambliss did to Max Cleland was despicable
- I support abolishing the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration because I see drug abuse, not drug use, as a social and medical problem—not a criminal problem. The U.S. government should not outlaw anyone's personal freedom as they do currently. Why should they?[2] I support the Portuguese model. I find the viewpoint of some U.S. "conservatives", those who believe that they know what God wants politicians and the government to do, to be highly flawed. I feel that that religiopolitical ideology might be best classified as a disease.
- "Reported" bug/feature requests
- To report bug/feature requests
- References
- ^ Original here; archived here.
- ^ Griffiths R, Richards W, Johnson M, McCann U, Jesse R (2008). "Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later". J Psychopharmacol. 22 (6): 621–32. doi:10.1177/0269881108094300. PMC 3050654. PMID 18593735.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
16 May 2024 |
Things going on with WikiProject Medicine articles
Did you know
- 19 May 2024 – Guardian Cap (talk · · hist) was nominated for DYK by Soulbust (t · c); see discussion
- 10 May 2024 – Chronotropic incompetence (talk · · hist) was nominated for DYK by Femke (t · c); see discussion
- 09 May 2024 – Adnan al-Bursh (talk · · hist) was nominated for DYK by Makeandtoss (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Laura Veale (talk · · hist) was nominated for DYK by Storye book (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Lie Kiat Teng (talk · · hist) was nominated for DYK by Crisco 1492 (t · c); see discussion
Articles for deletion
- 21 May 2024 – Instagram face (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Cassie Schebel (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 20 May 2024 – Lutz Heinemann (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Toadspike (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 20 May 2024 – Vegepet (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Traumnovelle (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
- 19 May 2024 – Precision cut liver slices (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Beland (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- 19 May 2024 – Vibratome (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Beland (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- 19 May 2024 – Precision cut kidney slices (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Beland (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
- 18 May 2024 – Precision cut tissue slices (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Beland (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
- 18 May 2024 – Sankar Natesan (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Vanderwaalforces (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
- 17 May 2024 – Maternity And Child Health Care Institute Benazirabad (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Saqib (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- 17 May 2024 – Taluka Hospital Sakrand (talk · · hist) was AfDed by Saqib (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- (14 more...)
Proposed deletions
- 19 May 2024 – Achievement motivation inventory (talk · · hist) was PRODed by GoodHue291 (t · c): The article has multiple issues within it. The article relies on a single source rather than multiple sources to back up the information. It also needs Inline Citations to correspond with general references. Plus, I do not think this article meets th ...
- 14 May 2024 – Mid Staffordshire Postgraduate Medical Centre (talk · · hist) was PRODed by B3251 (t · c): Fails WP:NORG.
Categories for discussion
- 28 Apr 2024 – Category:Deaths from food poisoning (talk · · hist) was CfDed by LaundryPizza03 (t · c); see discussion
- 23 Mar 2024 – Category:American geriatricians (talk · · hist) was CfDed by Marcocapelle (t · c); see discussion
- 22 Mar 2024 – Category:Australian geriatricians (talk · · hist) was CfDed by Smasongarrison (t · c); see discussion
- 22 Mar 2024 – Category:Canadian geriatricians (talk · · hist) was CfDed by Smasongarrison (t · c); see discussion
Redirects for discussion
- 18 May 2024 – Medicare’s problems (talk · · hist) →Medicare (United States) was RfDed by PleaseStand (t · c); see discussion
- 09 Apr 2024 – Kuru (disease (talk · · hist) →Kuru (disease) was RfDed by Utopes (t · c); see discussion
Featured article candidates
- 17 May 2024 – John Rolph (talk · · hist) was FA nominated by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 22 Apr 2024 – Dracunculiasis (talk · · hist) was FA nominated by Ajpolino (t · c); see discussion
Good article nominees
- 15 May 2024 – Charles Wambebe (talk · · hist) was GA nominated by Vanderwaalforces (t · c); start
- 24 Apr 2024 – Exhaustion disorder (talk · · hist) was GA nominated by Draken Bowser (t · c); start
- 16 Apr 2024 – Alexander Langmuir (talk · · hist) was GA nominated by BluePenguin18 (t · c); see discussion
- 28 Mar 2024 – Adrenal crisis (talk · · hist) was GA nominated by CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (t · c); start
- 22 Mar 2024 – Hepatic hydrothorax (talk · · hist) was GA nominated by Aeschylus (t · c); start
- 14 May 2024 – Statin (talk · · hist) GA nominated by RowanJ LP (t · c) was not promoted by Chiswick Chap (t · c), see discussion
Featured article reviews
Requests for comments
- 05 Apr 2024 – Havana syndrome (talk · · hist) has an RfC by Noleander (t · c); see discussion
Requested moves
- 20 May 2024 – TOPS System (talk · · hist) is requested to be moved to Total posterior spine system by Alpha3031 (t · c); see discussion
- 17 May 2024 – Autism spectrum (talk · · hist) is requested to be moved to Autism by A mentally disabled mathematician (t · c); see discussion
- 14 May 2024 – Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography (talk · · hist) is requested to be moved to Electrical capacitance volume tomography by Marashdeh (t · c); see discussion
- 09 May 2024 – Rhizotomy (talk · · hist) move request to Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy by Rubah (t · c) was moved to Selective dorsal rhizotomy (talk · · hist) by BilledMammal (t · c) on 17 May 2024; see discussion
Articles to be merged
- 18 May 2024 – Olivopontocerebellar atrophy (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to Multiple system atrophy by Fayenatic london (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Asperger syndrome (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to Autism spectrum by COArSe D1RTxxx (t · c); see discussion
- 28 Apr 2024 – Respiratory quotient (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to Respiratory exchange ratio by Klbrain (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Apr 2024 – Chromosome theory of cancer (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to Chromosome instability by Klbrain (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Apr 2024 – Fentanyl crisis in San Francisco (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to California opioid crisis by Klbrain (t · c); see discussion
- 19 Apr 2024 – Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder and Parkinson's disease (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder by SandyGeorgia (t · c); see discussion
- 17 Apr 2024 – Management of dehydration (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to Fluid replacement by Artoria2e5 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Apr 2024 – General medical journal (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to medical journal by Headbomb (t · c); see discussion
- 01 Apr 2024 – Kenneth Charles Easton (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to Ken Easton by Samoasambia (t · c); see discussion
- 26 Mar 2024 – Prophylactic salpingectomy (talk · · hist) is proposed for merging to Salpingectomy by Yutsi (t · c); see discussion
- (19 more...)
Articles to be split
- 22 Apr 2024 – State health agency (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by GobsPint (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Apr 2024 – Health department (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by GobsPint (t · c); see discussion
- 28 Mar 2024 – United Network for Organ Sharing (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by 45.26.61.142 (t · c); see discussion
- 03 Jan 2024 – Anisakis (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by Artoria2e5 (t · c); see discussion
- 17 Nov 2023 – Mycoplasma (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by Artoria2e5 (t · c); see discussion
- 27 May 2023 – Health advocacy (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by Felix QW (t · c); see discussion
- 31 Mar 2023 – Range of motion (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by Urbourbo (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Oct 2022 – Soft diet (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by AngusWOOF (t · c); see discussion
- 04 Jan 2022 – Arthur Neve (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by Breamk (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Dec 2021 – Care UK (talk · · hist) is proposed for splitting by Djm-leighpark (t · c); see discussion
- (4 more...)
Articles for creation
- 20 May 2024 – Draft:Josie Rogers (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Kate R. Farrell (t · c)
- 19 May 2024 – Draft:Purno Saikia (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Sourabhdotrai (t · c)
- 19 May 2024 – Draft:Clitoroplasty (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by The Anome (t · c)
- 19 May 2024 – Draft:Thomas Martin (pathologist) (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by CrafterNova (t · c)
- 17 May 2024 – Draft:Judo therapist (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Liz (t · c)
- 14 May 2024 – Draft:Bayo Aluko-Olokun (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Helloitsking (t · c)
- 11 May 2024 – Draft:John F. Crary (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Jfcrary (t · c)
- 09 May 2024 – Draft:Larry Lipshultz (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Oppename (t · c)
- 09 May 2024 – Draft:List of Indian medical colleges before Independence (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by KoiRitwikHai (t · c)
- 08 May 2024 – Draft:God Committees (talk · · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Edcous (t · c)
- (46 more...)
Medical articles up for deltion
Medicine
Instagram face
- Instagram face (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Instagram Face" is something very abstract and unverifiable, ie. two reliable sources may define it differently. It may also be inherently derogatory, as it is based on negative opinions about women's appearances. With Love from Cassie Schebel (talk) 01:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is something best discussed on the talk page. Thriley (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why? Since these are reasons to delete the article entirely, I would think this is where it belongs. This is a genuine question, I've never nominated an article for deletion before, and I am probably doing at least two things wrong. With Love from Cassie Schebel (talk) 01:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Popular culture, Medicine, Technology, and Internet. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 01:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Draft: Well the "Instagram face" is a thing, [7] and [8], but the wiki article seems to tell a different story. Should be sent back to draft to sort this out, topic seems notable. Oaktree b (talk) 01:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Vegepet
- Vegepet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCOMPANY, references are either non-independent or trivial. I did search for the company but found nothing in Google Scholar, Google Books, and Google News that'd lead me to believe it qualifies for GNG. Multiple references were added after a PROD but after reviewing all but three (one was an improper citation and the other was a broken url) I am still of the opinion it fails notability. Traumnovelle (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment review of references below.
Going through all the references I do not believe WP:GNG has been met with the changes.
Extended content
|
---|
31-32 Don't mention Vegepet anywhere.
|
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Medicine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
The article "Vegepet" merits inclusion in Wikipedia due to several reasons:
- Notable Subject: Vegepet is a significant topic within the realm of veganism and pet care, addressing the growing interest in providing vegan diets for pets.
- Relevant Information: The article provides valuable information about the concept of vegetarian and vegan pet food, contributing to the understanding of alternative diets for pets.
- Community Interest: There is evident interest in the subject, as demonstrated by the ongoing discussion and contributions from Wikipedia users. This indicates that the topic is relevant and worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia.
- Educational Value: Including information about Vegepet aligns with Wikipedia's goal of providing comprehensive and informative content to its readers. It allows individuals to learn about different dietary options for pets and the ethical considerations involved.
- Neutral Presentation: The article presents information in a neutral manner, providing facts and references to support its content. It adheres to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines regarding neutrality and verifiability.
Given these reasons, the article "Vegepet" should be retained on Wikipedia to continue serving as a valuable resource for individuals interested in vegetarian and vegan pet food options. MaynardClark (talk) 01:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Lutz Heinemann
- Lutz Heinemann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite the wealth of sources about this subject, I could not find one that is independent (i.e. not published by an institution or company he's affiliated with). There are one or two interviews, but these also do not count towards notability. The WP:GNG is not met, and I do not think any criteria from WP:NPROF apply here. Toadspike [Talk] 18:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep >30,000 citations according to Google Scholar suggests that criterion 1 of WP:PROF has been met.Uhooep (talk) 18:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Medicine, and Germany. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep: per Uhooep, although I could be convinced either way. Queen of Hearts (talk) 03:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Looking at the most cited papers on GS, they are also highly coauthored. Middle author (in a field where that matters) on a highly coauthored paper does not convince me of so much. However, I am seeing enough highly cited papers as first or last author that I think this is a pass of NPROF. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Precision cut liver slices
- Precision cut liver slices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Yet another subarticle of Precision cut tissue slices, created by a now-blocked paid editor for a company in the industry. There's a minimal history; not sure if it's too detailed for Wikipedia or would want to be merged into Histology or something. -- Beland (talk) 02:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 02:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to precision cut tissue slices; see my comments below. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Vibratome
- Vibratome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was apparently created by a now-blocked paid editor working for a company in the industry. The content is partly how-to and partly promotional and partly trivia. Perhaps it's best to drop it entirely or trim most of it and merge anything worth keeping into Microtome#Vibrating? -- Beland (talk) 02:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 02:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, my mistake; it was created by User:Davidswanepoel; the blocked User:M66JX did not start editing it until October 2023. Some spammy content was added by User:Neurolady27, who also attempted to create Precisionary Instruments. This was the company that apparently paid M66JX, so now I'm wondering if this was actually a second paid editor or account? -- Beland (talk) 02:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete: This is an important tool in histology and pathology laboratories, but most of the sources are about technique, not the machine itself. If kept, the "In media" section has to go, 100% SYNTH. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Precision cut kidney slices
- Precision cut kidney slices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Like precision cut tissue slices, this appears to have been created by a now-blocked paid editor, and is of uneven quality. Precision cut lung slices was created at the same time, but seems more informative. (I mention it in case someone wants to nominate it as well.) -- Beland (talk) 02:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 02:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment All the articles you mentioned read like college essays. There are brief references to some real publications, but no backing for other statements. It's all loaded with WP:OR. If anything, make precision cut tissue slices the main article, then merge the remaining to that. Otherwise, this probably could have been Speedy deleted? Conyo14 (talk) 07:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to precision cut tissue slices and trim that article down to remove all the lab cruft. All of these articles could be merged into a single article shorter than this one with no loss of useful content. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Precision cut tissue slices
- Precision cut tissue slices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Based on the block log and User talk:M66JX, it appears this article was created by a now-banned editor secretly working for Precisionary Instruments. The language is pervasively promotional, despite several editors making changes to tone it down. I'm not sure there needs to be a dedicated article on this topic, but WP:TNT seems like a good solution. -- Beland (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- After further hunting, it appears this topic overview is also covered by Histology#Sample preparation. -- Beland (talk) 00:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per all of the above. TH1980 (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete promotional and far from summary style, per nom. Draken Bowser (talk) 07:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Sankar Natesan
- Sankar Natesan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:GNG and also, being a registrar doesn't inherently make one notable. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. Shellwood (talk) 00:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Only possibility of a pass is WP:Prof#C1, but GS cites of less than 900 in this very highly cited field are not sufficient. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
- Delete. Registrar is generally a more senior post at Indian universities compared to the west, basically the chief administrative officer reporting directly to the president/vice chancellor, so it's possible that being a registrar might lead to more coverage. That said, I don't see sufficient sourcing for GNG and I don't see him clearly passing any of the NACADEMIC criteria. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology, Medicine, Singapore, Tamil Nadu, Illinois, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Nuclear Medicine Oncology & Radiotherapy Institute Nawabshah
- Nuclear Medicine Oncology & Radiotherapy Institute Nawabshah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Taluka Hospital Sakrand
- Taluka Hospital Sakrand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Maternity And Child Health Care Institute Benazirabad
- Maternity And Child Health Care Institute Benazirabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Fahim Rahim
- Fahim Rahim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertisement (and possible self-written resume) of an unnotable kidney doctor and small scale philanthropist. Article itself was written by one User:Khocon, a sockpuppeteer. We also have an article for Fahim's brother which might also be worthy of deletion. -Samoht27 (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Medicine, Pakistan, and Idaho. -Samoht27 (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This BLP appears to be highly PROMO, written by a blocked sockpuppet, and reads more like a resume to promote themselves and their business. While the subject has won some awards, it's unclear if any of them are notable. According to ANYBIO, we may have to keep the BLP if any of the awards are significant. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
The Vets (company)
- The Vets (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a company that does not pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Coverage is limited to news about product launches and market openings that are excluded from consideration as trivial under NCORP. Cannot find multiple examples of significant, secondary, independent coverage. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Companies, Medicine, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Marko Farion
- Marko Farion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the threshold of WP:SINGER, WP:NMUSICOTHER, or WP:ANYBIO. Online searches, including through JSTOR and newspaper archives, turn up no WP:SIGCOV. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Medicine, and Ukraine. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Zero coverage for this fellow, even what's used now isn't really enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 23:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Michigan and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Government Ayurvedic College, Guwahati
- Government Ayurvedic College, Guwahati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tried to improve the article but I failed to improve it per WP:SNG as well as others. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Medicine, India, and Assam. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There are plenty of reliable sources and qualifies for WP:GNG. It have both WP: PRIMARY and WP: SECONDARY sources mentioned as references. It also has historical importance as it is first and only Ayurvedic College in North East India region. -AjayDas (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was also not in favor to delete it. But I couldn't find sufficient references to establish the WP:GNG. If you can demonstrate the notability with sourcing, please do it. Otherwise, just a! vote and
" it is first and only Ayurvedic College in North East India region."
is not helping it anyhow.
- Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There are plenty of reliable sources and qualifies for WP:GNG. It have both WP: PRIMARY and WP: SECONDARY sources mentioned as references. It also has historical importance as it is first and only Ayurvedic College in North East India region. -AjayDas (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This page has poor sources and it does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. RangersRus (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Larkana
- Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Larkana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The press coverage received lacked depth or significance, failing to meet the WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either —Saqib (talk | contribs) 14:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 14:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 19:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't still get what you call PR. Though it may seem, but can't we check WP:BEFORE or any other way. This dawn.com author is a reporter per the articles written for the reliable news source. There is this from GBooks. In a search on news, I got many pop ups.here. All these are resourceful ways of checking the credibility of an article particularly to this one that focuses on Cancer(pharmaceutical) perhaps or whatever. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Surgery
Proposed deletions
An automatically generated list of proposed deletions and other medicine-related article alerts can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Article alerts, Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Article alerts, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience/Article alerts
Deletion Review
The Signpost
|