dablink notification message (see the FAQ) |
91.10.57.242 (talk) →Sockpuppet!: new section |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 19:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 19:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Sockpuppet! == |
|||
Someone accuses you of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACroton_Aqueduct&action=historysubmit&diff=548579755&oldid=548537471 sock puppetry]. I think you have met him before. --[[Special:Contributions/91.10.57.242|91.10.57.242]] ([[User talk:91.10.57.242|talk]]) 09:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:15, 4 April 2013
Flags
Flags are appropriate, especially in infoboxes, to give a quick indication of where something is found, when, by the topic's very nature, a range of possible places exists? 213.246.94.204 (talk) 10:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not for that topic. WP:MOSICON may help you understand.
- Which topic? 213.246.94.204 (talk) 22:55, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- yes, it was Brics or Bric. Please understand the topic before using flags.
- Yes, I'll try not to make the same oversight again. Please identify the topic of a message before sending it. 213.246.94.204 (talk) 11:45, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
How is the sentence "Bob Dylan is a famous musician" "peacockish" or "non-neutral"? If fame can't be measured, then neither can be notability. Regarding "controversially"—"controversial" is something that attracts controversy. What's "biased" about any of that? Toccata quarta (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Notice to DR/N volunteers! Dispute resolution discussions need attention
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there are currently discussions at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard which require the attention of a volunteer. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. Below this message is the DR/N status update.
You are receiving this notification to request assistance at the DR/N where you are listed as a volunteer. The number of cases has either become too large and/or there are many cases shaded with an alert status. Those shaded pink are marked as: "This request requires a volunteer's attention". Those shaded blue have had a volunteers attention recently
Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
Talk:Robert (doll)#Suggested_Lead_Edit_v4 | Closed | Gabriellemcnell (t) | 2 days, 13 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 1 days, 20 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 1 days, 20 hours |
Sales data dispute on Chris Brown article | In Progress | Instantwatym (t) | 2 days, 9 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 17 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 17 hours |
Peugeot 505, Peugeot 5CV | New | Avi8tor (t) | 16 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 10 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 10 hours |
Australia-China relations | New | MatthewDalhousie (t) | 1 hours | None | n/a | MatthewDalhousie (t) | 1 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 06:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Always use
{{subst :DRN Volunteer-notice }}
when using this template as notification. - If your replies are directed to the template talkpage, the template was used without subst.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
undid bot revision, restored your edits
Hi. Just wanted to let you know that I undid a bot revision from before your last three edits. However, I restored those changes of yours. Regards – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 08:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: Traditional Chinese medicine
To make the page history more complete, pretty much. As described in principle 10 of my notes about importing, an import has absolutely no effect on the content of the page that readers see, except for some bizarre corner cases that don't apply to the Traditional Chinese medicine page. In other words, a reader would have never seen the 2001 revisions that Traditional Chinese medicine that I imported, unless they went into the page history to look for them. Graham87 12:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biryani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Curb Chain, it has been requested by Cnilep that List of important publications in anthropology be moved to Bibliography of anthropology. Your comments on this request are most welcome. Please see Talk:List of important publications in anthropology#Requested move. Anthrophilos (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Traditional Chinese medicine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stasis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Reliable Sources Question
Hi. I was the one who added Imperial Circus Dead Decadence into the list of melodic death metal bands. I just now saw that it was removed because of an "unreliable source". Would Encyclopedia Metallum/Metal Archives be considered reliable? If not, what sources are considered reliable besides below?
Some of ICDD and their latest album's info found here: vaguedge.info and Imperial Circus Dead Decadence | 狂おしく咲いた凄惨な骸は奏で、愛おしく裂いた少女は聖餐の詞を謳う。 (Both Japanese) Right now, I'm looking for more sources that would be credible.
ありがとう。
Ruukasu2005 (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Costume jewelry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Sterling
- Dryas octopetala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Prostrate
- Oh, hell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Swedish
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Curb Chain; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thanks for all your hardwork! LK (talk) 08:42, 16 March 2013 (UTC) |
Your message on my page entitled TIP
Please forgive me, but the actual meaning of your cryptic message on an edit from nearly 6 years ago escapes me. The Wikipedia style essays you referenced seemed rather off into left field. If I inadvertently hit some nerve with you, I assure you it was not my intention. Were you wanting a reference for the asserted fact? Generally, we try not to overburden an opening paragraph with a cite for every sentence but if you feel that is needed, I'll be happy to do it. 6 years ago, I was not as good at using Google Books as I am now. I mostly watch over the Fudge related articles to keep profanity from blighting them. Thankfully, Penuche doesn't attract it as much as others. I'd be glad to look up some cites from various sources to legitimize the use of the term you singled out, Brown Sugar Candy, if necessary. It would be better, stylistically speaking, to develop the article further by adding paragraphs on regional varieties and their corresponding names with the citations placed in those paragraphs. The article would benefit from such expansion in my view and if you have an interest in regional cooking, or regional desserts, I could certainly use the help and enthusiasm. It would be pleasant to have a little help filling out such articles. Penuche is such a basic flavor and recipe in so many cultures and regions of the USA. I feel it deserves more attention than it has gotten in the existing article. I admit to being a bit of a foodie, having worked in catering to pay my Grad School bills. In these days of canned frostings, Semi-homemade everythings and the loss of regional and ethnic methods and tastes in baking, it would be sweet indeed, to delve more deeply into the heavenly but simple combination of ingredients that give Penuche its memorable taste, texture and place of honor in our memories of holidays past. Do let me know how I can help wit this and any other article you have your eye upon. LiPollis (talk) 19:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Quotes and verification
Hi Curb Chain, I don't know if we've run into each other before, but I wanted to bring something up. If you feel that a source needs to be verified by a quotation, it's usually best to use a template like {{Request quotation}} or something similar as described here. Removing the information (as here and here) is usually not the best way to go about it (barring BLP or MEDRS issues). If it is not urgent, there's nothing wrong with waiting for a source to be verified after requesting a quote. Let me know if you have any questions, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bergamot orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to RP
- Trachyspermum ammi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Tamil
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Sockpuppet!
Someone accuses you of sock puppetry. I think you have met him before. --91.10.57.242 (talk) 09:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC)