Content deleted Content added
Creating DYK nomination for Viaud Ridge (DYK-helper) |
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk | contribs) Review |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* {{DYKmake|Viaud Ridge|EpicPupper|subpage=Viaud Ridge}} |
* {{DYKmake|Viaud Ridge|EpicPupper|subpage=Viaud Ridge}} |
||
--> |
--> |
||
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Article is new enough (translated articles are eligible) and long enough. ALT hooks are a little boring, the main one is misleading as dropping someone in the sea is not "burying". I think there is a maintenance template and the coordinate map seems to have some kind of problem. I can't speak French nor access most of the sources but I can verify some of the sources. Source #8 and #9 appear to be broken. Didn't see any copyvio or plagiarism, dropping a few sentences into Google yielded nothing untoward. QPQ exemption is in effect. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]]) 15:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING THE ASTERISK * --> |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 15:53, 9 April 2022
Viaud Ridge
- ... that Viaud Ridge was named after Gustave Viaud, who was buried in the range? Source: ISBN 978-2-84050-607-2; source 1
- ALT1: ... that Viaud Ridge was discovered in 1970 by ships passing through the Indian Ocean? Source: GEBCO; source 8, dead link
- ALT2: ... that Viaud Ridge, discovered in 1970, was poorly defined until 2018? Source: Source 9, dead link
Created by EpicPupper (talk). Self-nominated at 04:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC).
- Article is new enough (translated articles are eligible) and long enough. ALT hooks are a little boring, the main one is misleading as dropping someone in the sea is not "burying". I think there is a maintenance template and the coordinate map seems to have some kind of problem. I can't speak French nor access most of the sources but I can verify some of the sources. Source #8 and #9 appear to be broken. Didn't see any copyvio or plagiarism, dropping a few sentences into Google yielded nothing untoward. QPQ exemption is in effect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)