Content deleted Content added
Hamiltonstone (talk | contribs) note re revisions |
update |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
* [[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] What's happening here? — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC) |
* [[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] What's happening here? — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
:: Sorry, I intended to get back to this one weeks ago but then a couple of policy discussions came up that triggered a serious case of wiki-burnout and I just had to walk away from the project to replenish the batteries a bit. I am feeling a little better now so I will try to get this one ready for review in the next few days. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC) |
:: Sorry, I intended to get back to this one weeks ago but then a couple of policy discussions came up that triggered a serious case of wiki-burnout and I just had to walk away from the project to replenish the batteries a bit. I am feeling a little better now so I will try to get this one ready for review in the next few days. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::Passing note to indicate that I looked at the article, and made some revisions for context, balance and copyediting, and have let Gato know. Regards, [[User:Hamiltonstone|hamiltonstone]] ([[User talk:Hamiltonstone|talk]]) 00:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
:::Passing note to indicate that I looked at the article, and made some revisions for context, balance and copyediting, and have let Gato know. Regards, [[User:Hamiltonstone|hamiltonstone]] ([[User talk:Hamiltonstone|talk]]) 00:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
* Firstly, my apologies to Yerevanci for the time it's taken me to complete my additions, and my thanks for his patience. I think I have more or less completed my additions to this article now, so if Yerevanci has no objections to the new content, this nomination can now be relisted for review. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 12:03, 13 October 2013
Chechen-Russian conflict
- ... that the Chechen-Russian conflict (Chechen rebel pictured) dates back to as far as 1785?
- Reviewed: Japanese serow
Moved to mainspace by Yerevanci (talk). Self nominated at 19:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC).
New enough, long enough and well sourced. QPQ done. Hook is short and directly sourced. AGF on offline sources. Images in article appear fine.
Hook image appears fine, but it's not used in the article currently. Mohamed CJ (talk) 10:01, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Please check again. --Երևանցի talk 17:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Everything is fine. It's just that the image nominated with the hook (File:Evstafiev-chechnya-tank-helmet.jpg) has to be used in the article. See Wikipedia:DYK#Images. Mohamed CJ (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah. --Երևանցի talk 18:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Good to go now. Mohamed CJ (talk) 18:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah. --Երևանցի talk 18:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Everything is fine. It's just that the image nominated with the hook (File:Evstafiev-chechnya-tank-helmet.jpg) has to be used in the article. See Wikipedia:DYK#Images. Mohamed CJ (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Please check again. --Երևանցի talk 17:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I have pulled this from the queue as I think the article has POV and probably accuracy issues. For example, the article simply states that the conflict began in 1785 when Russia tried to conquer Chechnya, but the first source for the article I reviewed states that the 1785 conflict was begun by a Chechnyan revolt led by an imam who planned the forcible conversion of his neighbours. The article mentions this revolt but presents it in such a way as to imply that the revolt was the result of the Russian invasion rather than the other way around. The same source also seems to suggest that the conflict began well before 1785, between Chechens moving down from the mountains and Cossacks who had settled on the plains. The rest of the article similarly seems to be lacking in contextual information to say the least. So I think this one will have to be held until a more thorough review can be completed. Gatoclass (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Let's see. Ref 4 from the Universirty of Maryland says "Sheik Mansur leads Chechens in their first attempt to resist Russian encroachment on their lands." The University of Southern California source (ref 5) says "Russian military involvement into the Caucasus started early in the 18th century and in 1785-1791 the first major rebellion in Chechnya against the imperial rule took place." Doesn't this mean the Russians wanted to conquer Chechnya and the Chechens revolted? What exactly is POV here?
- The rest of the article similarly seems to be lacking in contextual information to say the least. So I think this one will have to be held until a more thorough review can be completed. I thought Wikipedia is a community and everyone is free to edit. Isn't that the case? I didn't know this is a GA/FA review. Let others too fill the "lack in contextual information" as you claim. --Երևանցի talk 18:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- The U. Maryland source looks leftwing and a little iffy. The USC source doesn't exactly contradict the source I mentioned above, but regardless both of the sources you mention are nothing more than brief chronologies, the other source is much more detailed and presumably more accurate. Gatoclass (talk) 14:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Take a look at T:TDYK. There are nominators who have been waiting 2 1/2 months for completion of their reviews. There is a long backlog here due to shortage of reviewers, and I currently have a lot of work to do on other nominations, so you are going to have to exercise some patience. Gatoclass (talk) 09:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Per User:Ucucha/HarvErrors, refs 7 and 8 Harvrefs come up as "doesn't point to any citation". — Maile (talk) 14:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think one month is an enough period to assume that Gatoclass isn't returning to this. Needs a new review. --Երևանցի talk 06:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
What's happening here? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I intended to get back to this one weeks ago but then a couple of policy discussions came up that triggered a serious case of wiki-burnout and I just had to walk away from the project to replenish the batteries a bit. I am feeling a little better now so I will try to get this one ready for review in the next few days. Gatoclass (talk) 12:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Passing note to indicate that I looked at the article, and made some revisions for context, balance and copyediting, and have let Gato know. Regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 00:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I intended to get back to this one weeks ago but then a couple of policy discussions came up that triggered a serious case of wiki-burnout and I just had to walk away from the project to replenish the batteries a bit. I am feeling a little better now so I will try to get this one ready for review in the next few days. Gatoclass (talk) 12:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Firstly, my apologies to Yerevanci for the time it's taken me to complete my additions, and my thanks for his patience. I think I have more or less completed my additions to this article now, so if Yerevanci has no objections to the new content, this nomination can now be relisted for review. Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)