36.77.95.9 (talk) No edit summary |
180.245.109.42 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{ITN talk|2 December|2018|oldid=871715082}} |
{{ITN talk|2 December|2018|oldid=871715082}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Death|class=C|importance=low}} |
||
{{WPDM|class=C|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject France|class=C|importance=High}} |
{{WikiProject France|class=C|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=C|importance=Mid|Social movements=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Taxation|class=C|importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Taxation|class=C|importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
Revision as of 13:24, 9 August 2020
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Template:Friendly search suggestions
Populist or?
Why is reference 63 used? Its just an opinion piece. The statement that the yellow vests movement is populist is not supported by this reference. Fareed Zakaria mentions some populist plans by Steven Bannon and then only suggests the movement seems like it is populist. We have to be careful to avoid adding unsubstantiated claims about descriptions of things - Shiftchange (talk) 01:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Yes, looks like political propaganda. "Content must be written from a neutral point of view". Deleted. Wiki Tiki Tavi rus (talk) 16:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Agreed! this is a LEADERLESS heterogeneous popular movement, not a populist movement. To insist it’s populist is simply incorrect. That’s not to deny that there are some who make that criticism to run it down. “Populist” is a value-laden term used to disparage the movement. It’s not a question of getting worked up about anything, but a question of maintaining an objective perspective. I hope that explains my deletion from the main description. Skiddiwich (talk) 20:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- This has been a point of contention for quite a while, this is why references which referred to the movement as "populist" (CNN, BBC, WaPo) were put into the ref-group you've deleted three times now. I really don't think there's much point in getting worked up by the 1-syllable distinction between a "popular" and "populist" movement. Why is this important? addendum: the "grassroots" movement ref-group was made at the same time in order to provide balance between "popular" and "populist", if I remember correctly. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 09:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- If you can't find "distinction between a "popular" and "populist" movement" you should call it "popular". "Grassroot" doesn't provide balance. You can't balance False with even with compliment, not to mention neutral epithets like "grassroot". Wiki Tiki Tavi rus (talk) 11:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
PRINCIPAL PICTURE
What the fuck is this first picture ? It does not look like a protestation but like carnival. Come on do a little effort and chose a better one .... -_-
Should the US be included?
The US is not marked on the map, but a protest in Vermont is listed in the article. What gives?--Adûnâi (talk) 11:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
About the mistakes of translation
It is said in the article "president of the very rich", but in France we use the expression "president of the rich" only. this is a "word by word" translation, but our expression is to be understood as "president of the bankers" (meaning the "rich that are against the poors", or "the rich that never mind the poors"). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB0C:83F1:AF00:9494:C97A:9032:A65D (talk) 00:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)