Technogreek43 (talk | contribs) |
Technogreek43 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
::if this is such a big deal, make a sortable wikitable with the superstars and the platforms they are available on?? If not make a list and make a note on the side with the platforms they are on, if none of that works leave it as it is. If this turns into an edit war, you guys will be blocked...'''''[[User:Truco9311|<span style="background:black;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">Tr<span style="background:blue">U<span style="background:black">cO</span>93</span>11</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Truco9311|<b style="color:darkblue">TaLk</b>]]</sup> / <sub>[[User:Truco9311/Guestbook|<b style="color:darkblue">SiGn</b>]]</sup>''''' 20:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
::if this is such a big deal, make a sortable wikitable with the superstars and the platforms they are available on?? If not make a list and make a note on the side with the platforms they are on, if none of that works leave it as it is. If this turns into an edit war, you guys will be blocked...'''''[[User:Truco9311|<span style="background:black;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">Tr<span style="background:blue">U<span style="background:black">cO</span>93</span>11</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Truco9311|<b style="color:darkblue">TaLk</b>]]</sup> / <sub>[[User:Truco9311/Guestbook|<b style="color:darkblue">SiGn</b>]]</sup>''''' 20:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
* A list is the way to do it. Just because it's the new game does not mean it should be treated any diffrently. Oh, and Rob, you really don't need to be a jerk to everyone every freaking time you don't get your way. [[User:Technogreek43|Tech43]] ([[User talk:Technogreek43|talk]]) 20:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
* A list is the way to do it. Just because it's the new game does not mean it should be treated any diffrently. Oh, and Rob, you really don't need to be a jerk to everyone every freaking time you don't get your way. [[User:Technogreek43|Tech43]] ([[User talk:Technogreek43|talk]]) 20:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
* A table would work too. Anything but what we have right now. [[User:Technogreek43|Tech43]] ([[User talk:Technogreek43|talk]]) 21:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:15, 28 December 2007
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Roster
Can someone add a roster sheet to this page since the game has been released and now the whole roster is confirmed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.53.19 (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Soundtrack in prose?
Why us the soundtrack written in prose??? The soundtrack should be a list. Hiphopchamp 17:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's an encyclopedia that "anyone" can edit, and as such, is meant to be totally inaccesible and incomprehensible to the lowly street rat. Or you could say that because it is in fact an encyclopedic article and not IGN, there's some sort of strange rationale that doesn't benefit anyone that has been decided. Oh well, tough luck eh? --Kaizer13 (talk) 23:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Again, Wikipedia:Embedded lists states: "In an article, significant items should be mentioned naturally within the text rather than merely listed." Please direct all smarmy remarks about the guideline to Wikipedia talk:Embedded list. God forbid we should actually have standards on Wikipedia. The fascists! We surely shouldn't have to read prose - goodness knows I do enough of that every day as it is. :P --Jtalledo (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Matches
The type of matches are entered only need linking & Ordering —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chileno.s21 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Changing focus
i just played the game and i couldn't manually change the focus of my character, but it was done automatically whenever i got close to an opponent. maybe this should be noted? J.C. (talk) 04:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- All the Smackdown games have been like that, you have to cange the settings in the options menu. Don.-.J 16:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- This isn't a tech help forum, and you should try to actually play it before you answer Don. For some reason, Yuke's have taken that feature away, probably because Yuke's is controlled by Soviet spies bankrolled by TNA. --Kaizer13 08:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- It may not be a help forum but that is a good question. I'm lost about it too. If changing your target isn't featured in the game, to me, a long time fan of the SD! Series, it is notable. Put a quick sentence in the Gameplay section if it's true. I hope not. Ladder4321 11:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- This isn't a tech help forum, and you should try to actually play it before you answer Don. For some reason, Yuke's have taken that feature away, probably because Yuke's is controlled by Soviet spies bankrolled by TNA. --Kaizer13 08:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Add this!
That whenever you make a CAW you cant change their stance on the PSP!(freakin rip off!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.246.93.13 (talk) 01:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
No, and if you add it, it would be vandlism.--Hardcore Hak 14:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Unlockable?
Are Stephanie, Jillian etc... actually available on any of the consoles? CandiceWalsh (talk) 17:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
controls for the psp
how can you irish whip
because i do not have the book and i dont know the conttrols —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.224.29 (talk) 22:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Roster List
The roster section on this article is extremely messed up. I propose we make a list, so it can be more organized. It's not important who returns from WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2006 or WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2007, or the series mainstays like past lists have done. Tech43 (talk) 22:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I agree. It is extremely hard to read. 207.69.137.40 (talk) 16:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- A cluttered list isn't helpful in my view. Just because it was done one way for a while, doesn't mean every article must look the same. As for the attribute rating: that's game guide content and not encyclopedic. RobJ1981 (talk) 09:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Rob, Make me the 3rd person to vote (not including the person who made it a list originally) to change the roster list to an actual list. Where in any encyclopedia, is a roster list, soundtrack or any type of list written in paragraphical format? We don't need background info on who has been in the game before. it's irrelevant to the current game and its encyclopedia article. And by the way, none of the information is sourced AND you're the only one against it. So unless you can drum up more than one person against the change, then we HAVE consensus. Angrymansr (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Consensus can change, and it's only been a few days. Have a better attitude and let others comment before you determine that a list is preferred way to discuss the roster. Are you going to change the roster each time the consensus changes? All things for an article aren't just determined the moment you feel like they should be. RobJ1981 (talk) 19:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Rob, Make me the 3rd person to vote (not including the person who made it a list originally) to change the roster list to an actual list. Where in any encyclopedia, is a roster list, soundtrack or any type of list written in paragraphical format? We don't need background info on who has been in the game before. it's irrelevant to the current game and its encyclopedia article. And by the way, none of the information is sourced AND you're the only one against it. So unless you can drum up more than one person against the change, then we HAVE consensus. Angrymansr (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Consensus is magically going to change with this article, when there has been concensus on this formatting for years? Almost every single WWE Wrestling game that has a Wiki article has the roster as a list. Go look for yourself. List of WWE Wrestling games. One rogue editor isn't going to change that. There is no single logical reason that it needs to be a paragraph, other than you like it. You have yet to give a single reason to keep it as is, yet you keep reverting the change.
- The current format is difficult to decipher and sloppy, it is not clear and concise. Lists are made so that it can be glanced at quickly and understood. This section does not accomplish that.
- It's the standard for WWE video game articles, as well as any sports-type roster
- None of the information is sourced
- Most of this section is just fluff. Historical information about who's been in what other games does not contribute to the current article. The article spends more time on other games, then it does getting to the point of who is actually in the game. Does any one care that you can unlock Vince McMahon's bald attire when looking for a game roster? Like you said, that's strategy guide stuff.
- Where was consensus when you and Jtalledo decided to change it from a list to prose while MANY other users voiced their desire to have it otherwise?
Angrymansr (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- While we're at it, let's make the In-game arenas and soundtrack sections paragraphs too! We can talk about how the Smackdown Arena is making it's 13th consecutive appearance in a WWE game. That would be compelling reading. Angrymansr (talk) 19:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- if this is such a big deal, make a sortable wikitable with the superstars and the platforms they are available on?? If not make a list and make a note on the side with the platforms they are on, if none of that works leave it as it is. If this turns into an edit war, you guys will be blocked...TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 20:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- A list is the way to do it. Just because it's the new game does not mean it should be treated any diffrently. Oh, and Rob, you really don't need to be a jerk to everyone every freaking time you don't get your way. Tech43 (talk) 20:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- A table would work too. Anything but what we have right now. Tech43 (talk) 21:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)