Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:The Ruin (Ukrainian history) to Talk:Ruin (period of history): Revert vandalism |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It seems like the article was started to heroize the traitor Vyhovsky. Wikipedia does not need nationalist oversimplifications. Please consider rewriting. --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 15:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC) |
It seems like the article was started to heroize the traitor Vyhovsky. Wikipedia does not need nationalist oversimplifications. Please consider rewriting. --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 15:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
: It is true that Wikipedia does not need nationalist oversimplifications, that includes the use of highly bias word "traitor" that is commonly used by rabid Russian nationalists in relation to Ukrainian historical figures. If you want to make a pretence of being objective, please avoid using it. Secondly, if I think rewriting it, the role of Vyhovsky will not be change to suit Russian nationalist myths ans desires. Please consult the article about the hetman Vyhovsky and in the future, please do not make significant changes without discussing first. All attempts at vandalism from any Russian nationalists will be promptly reported.--[[User:Hillock65|Hillock65]] 16:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:55, 19 December 2006
It seems like the article was started to heroize the traitor Vyhovsky. Wikipedia does not need nationalist oversimplifications. Please consider rewriting. --Ghirla -трёп- 15:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- It is true that Wikipedia does not need nationalist oversimplifications, that includes the use of highly bias word "traitor" that is commonly used by rabid Russian nationalists in relation to Ukrainian historical figures. If you want to make a pretence of being objective, please avoid using it. Secondly, if I think rewriting it, the role of Vyhovsky will not be change to suit Russian nationalist myths ans desires. Please consult the article about the hetman Vyhovsky and in the future, please do not make significant changes without discussing first. All attempts at vandalism from any Russian nationalists will be promptly reported.--Hillock65 16:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)