This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reaction to the Trailer
Shouldn't this article mention the film's controversial trailer? Many mainstream news outlets are currently talking about it.[1] 98.20.149.86 (talk) 01:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm I don't know how "mainstream" you think Fox is. Drmies (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The Fox News Channel - which you refer to as 'Fox' - is conglomerate of national and international television channels and websites now headquartered in New York City. It is owned by Fox News Media, which itself is owned by the Fox Corporation. It is the most-watched cable network in the U.S. Fox Corp. deals primarily in the television broadcast, news, and sports broadcasting industries. Its assets include the Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Fox News, Fox Business, Fox Sports, Tubi, and others. Its sister company, News Corp, incorporates newspaper interests and other media assets. By any definition, it's as 'mainstream' as CNN or the BBC. Hubertgrove (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the corporate lesson, User:Hubertgrove. I note that the article in question cites comments by "many commentators"--which quickly turn out to be social media comments by outlets like "conservative social media account MythinformedMKE", best known for spreading lies about queer theory and Black scholars, and *surprise* a conspiracy theory about how academia is structurally racist: against white people. How reliable Fox News is on this topic (the article is really bad, just read it) depends on which row you think this article fits in, "Politics and news" or not: see WP:RSP. "Mainstream"--this article presents only opinions by disgruntled social media characters from one particular side of the spectrum. Drmies (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm glad I helped you, User:Drmies. Who says the "many commentators" Fox apparently is citing are "spreading lies about queer theory and Black [sic] scholars" *and* "are best known" for this? Is it you? I'm sure you know OR is discouraged on Wikipedia, especially if unsubstantiated by reputable publications. Hubertgrove (talk) 09:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh dear, Hubertgrove. Feel free to tweak your snide remark after rereading my comment. I'm sure you will see, on a second reading, that I was taking about MythinformedMKE. And yes, "Black" with a capital B, like so many outlets do, and style guides recommend, these days. Your "sic" is telling. Drmies (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- "Snide"? "Tweak"? What's wrong with you? I must direct you to WP:CIVIL)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_be_rude
- Please don't talk to other people like this again. Hubertgrove (talk) 01:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- It's black with a lower case "b", you black supremacist they/them grifter. 2A00:23C7:8908:9401:BA:475:6293:A0AA (talk) 14:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oh dear, Hubertgrove. Feel free to tweak your snide remark after rereading my comment. I'm sure you will see, on a second reading, that I was taking about MythinformedMKE. And yes, "Black" with a capital B, like so many outlets do, and style guides recommend, these days. Your "sic" is telling. Drmies (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm glad I helped you, User:Drmies. Who says the "many commentators" Fox apparently is citing are "spreading lies about queer theory and Black [sic] scholars" *and* "are best known" for this? Is it you? I'm sure you know OR is discouraged on Wikipedia, especially if unsubstantiated by reputable publications. Hubertgrove (talk) 09:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the corporate lesson, User:Hubertgrove. I note that the article in question cites comments by "many commentators"--which quickly turn out to be social media comments by outlets like "conservative social media account MythinformedMKE", best known for spreading lies about queer theory and Black scholars, and *surprise* a conspiracy theory about how academia is structurally racist: against white people. How reliable Fox News is on this topic (the article is really bad, just read it) depends on which row you think this article fits in, "Politics and news" or not: see WP:RSP. "Mainstream"--this article presents only opinions by disgruntled social media characters from one particular side of the spectrum. Drmies (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The Fox News Channel - which you refer to as 'Fox' - is conglomerate of national and international television channels and websites now headquartered in New York City. It is owned by Fox News Media, which itself is owned by the Fox Corporation. It is the most-watched cable network in the U.S. Fox Corp. deals primarily in the television broadcast, news, and sports broadcasting industries. Its assets include the Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Fox News, Fox Business, Fox Sports, Tubi, and others. Its sister company, News Corp, incorporates newspaper interests and other media assets. By any definition, it's as 'mainstream' as CNN or the BBC. Hubertgrove (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
References
No criticism?
NOTFORUM
|
---|
No mention that previews thus far can only be described as extremely racist? Mention of future dates as though they’ve already happened? Yeesh. 76.131.150.18 (talk) 21:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Article seems to be vandalized
The films description as "extremely anti-white racist movie" seems like deliberate vandalism. Maybe this page needs to be protected for a while? 2A01:599:B25:F978:92E:13E6:5D4:90D6 (talk) 12:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
One Sided Article
Google "magical negro most dangerous animal" and you get tons of hits. This article should mention the movie's use of this phrase. 70.161.8.90 (talk) 22:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)