Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Stanley Kubrick/Archive 15) (bot |
→Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024: new section |
||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. [[Special:Contributions/202.190.25.42|202.190.25.42]] ([[User talk:202.190.25.42|talk]]) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. [[Special:Contributions/202.190.25.42|202.190.25.42]] ([[User talk:202.190.25.42|talk]]) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024 == |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=no}} |
|||
Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 [[User:Andyamo72|Andyamo72]] ([[User talk:Andyamo72|talk]]) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:06, 11 April 2024
Stanley Kubrick has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2023
Change " "big bang"; " in 4th paragraph to " "big bang;" " Grammar error Charliegoose (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's correct Hyphenation Expert (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein
search:
- Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein
2601:646:201:480:4690:5278:E18F:5E4B (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
potential missing word
Current quote: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." Possibilities: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films [that|which] broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." or "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground [and] are now considered landmarks." or something else! 213.120.28.36 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I vote for the [and] option. I think that sounds great! Georgelazenby (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." BillyShearsss (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)talk 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Barry Lyndon: Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. 202.190.25.42 (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024
Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 Andyamo72 (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)