BillyShearsss (talk | contribs) →Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024: new section |
EphemeralPerpetuals (talk | contribs) →Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024: Edit request not done. (Edit Request Tool) |
||
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
== Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024 == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024 == |
||
{{ |
{{Edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=yes}} |
||
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." [[User:BillyShearsss|BillyShearsss]] ([[User talk:BillyShearsss|talk]]) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC) |
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." [[User:BillyShearsss|BillyShearsss]] ([[User talk:BillyShearsss|talk]]) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. [[User:EphemeralPerpetuals|<span style="font: small-caps 15px times; color:#CC5500">EphemeralPerpetuals <small>(they/them)</small></span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:EphemeralPerpetuals|<b style="font: small-caps 12px times; color:#000000">talk</b>]]</sup> 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:49, 14 January 2024
![]() | Stanley Kubrick has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2023
In the section Filmography, in the table “Directed Features”, the film “Fear and Desire” (1952) should be listed, as it’s Kubrick’s first feature length film. 108.29.149.119 (talk) 02:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- It is listed as such at Stanley Kubrick filmography#Feature films. I am not sure why we have the other 12 in table format here since the link to the filmography article is sufficient. I would suggest removing this table. MarnetteD|Talk 04:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done: I agree with MarnetteD. I've boldly removed the relevant table in whole. —Sirdog (talk) 05:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
The use of "filmmaker"
My edit has been reverted. Why can't the lead sentence say "American filmmaker"? I'm confused. I've already discussed this with FMSky before (see User talk:FMSky#About the use of "Filmmaker" in the infobox). Thedarkknightli (talk) 13:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- It's in the second sentence, the first seems fine as is. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2023
Change " "big bang"; " in 4th paragraph to " "big bang;" " Grammar error Charliegoose (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's correct Hyphenation Expert (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein
search:
- Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein
2601:646:201:480:4690:5278:E18F:5E4B (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
potential missing word
Current quote: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." Possibilities: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films [that|which] broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." or "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground [and] are now considered landmarks." or something else! 213.120.28.36 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I vote for the [and] option. I think that sounds great! Georgelazenby (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." BillyShearsss (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done: The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)talk 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)