Tag: AWB |
HouseBlaster (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=180|archive_units=days|archive_bot= |
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=180|archive_units=days|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}} |
||
{{American English}} |
{{American English}} |
||
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}} |
|||
{{Round in circles|search=yes}} |
|||
{{Article history |
{{Article history |
||
|action1=FAC |
|action1=FAC |
||
Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
|topic=film |
|topic=film |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|collapsed=yes|1= |
|||
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=People |
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=People}} |
||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Screenwriters |
{{WikiProject Screenwriters |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no |
{{WikiProject Biography |living=no |filmbio-priority=Top |filmbio-work-group=yes |listas=Kubrick, Stanley}} |
||
{{WikiProject Chess |
{{WikiProject Chess |importance=Bottom}} |
||
{{WikiProject New York City |
{{WikiProject New York City |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Hertfordshire |
{{WikiProject Hertfordshire |importance=High}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
Line 47: | Line 46: | ||
|algo = old(180d) |
|algo = old(180d) |
||
|archive = Talk:Stanley Kubrick/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:Stanley Kubrick/Archive %(counter)d |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Calm|#FFCCCC}} |
|||
{{Press |
{{Press |
||
|collapsed=no |
|collapsed=no |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{annual readership}} |
{{annual readership}} |
||
{{Tmbox |
|||
| text = There have been numerous previous discussions about inclusion of an infobox in this article. Before discussing, or starting a new RfC, please review the discussions listed below. {{ulist |
|||
| August 2015 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_7#No_Infobox|"No Infobox"]]; result: '''consensus against including an infobox'''. |
|||
| January 2017 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_9#RfC:_Should_an_infobox_be_added_to_this_page?|"Should an infobox be added to this page?"]]; result: '''no consensus'''. |
|||
| 2017–2018 [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_10|additional non-RfC discussions]]. |
|||
| October 2018 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_11#RfC:_Should_a_collapsible_infobox_be_added_to_this_page?|"Should a collapsible infobox be added to this page?"]]; result: '''consensus against including a collapsible infobox'''. |
|||
| September 2019 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_12#Rfc:_Should_an_Infobox_be_added?|"Should an Infobox be added?"]]; result: '''no consensus'''. This discussion was followed by a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanction]] prohibiting further infobox discussions until September 2021 ([[Special:Diff/915694845|diff]]) |
|||
| November 2021 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley Kubrick/Archive 14#RFC: Infobox or not|"RFC: Infobox or not"]]; result: '''consensus for including an uncollapsed infobox'''. |
|||
}} |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2023 == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2023 == |
Revision as of 02:13, 20 November 2023
![]() | Stanley Kubrick has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Vital article
|
Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2023
In the section Filmography, in the table “Directed Features”, the film “Fear and Desire” (1952) should be listed, as it’s Kubrick’s first feature length film. 108.29.149.119 (talk) 02:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- It is listed as such at Stanley Kubrick filmography#Feature films. I am not sure why we have the other 12 in table format here since the link to the filmography article is sufficient. I would suggest removing this table. MarnetteD|Talk 04:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done: I agree with MarnetteD. I've boldly removed the relevant table in whole. —Sirdog (talk) 05:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
The use of "filmmaker"
My edit has been reverted. Why can't the lead sentence say "American filmmaker"? I'm confused. I've already discussed this with FMSky before (see User talk:FMSky#About the use of "Filmmaker" in the infobox). Thedarkknightli (talk) 13:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- It's in the second sentence, the first seems fine as is. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2023
Change " "big bang"; " in 4th paragraph to " "big bang;" " Grammar error Charliegoose (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's correct Hyphenation Expert (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein
search:
- Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein
2601:646:201:480:4690:5278:E18F:5E4B (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
potential missing word
Current quote: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." Possibilities: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films [that|which] broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." or "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground [and] are now considered landmarks." or something else! 213.120.28.36 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I vote for the [and] option. I think that sounds great! Georgelazenby (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)