HouseBlaster (talk | contribs) |
62.166.252.25 (talk) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|topic=film |
|topic=film |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|collapsed=yes|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Kubrick, Stanley|1= |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=People}} |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-priority=Top |filmbio-work-group=yes }} |
||
{{WikiProject Chess|importance=Bottom}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography |living=no |filmbio-priority=Top |filmbio-work-group=yes |listas=Kubrick, Stanley}} |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Hertfordshire|importance=High}} |
||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
Line 68: | Line 67: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{annual readership}} |
{{annual readership}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
In the section Filmography, in the table “Directed Features”, the film “Fear and Desire” (1952) should be listed, as it’s Kubrick’s first feature length film. [[Special:Contributions/108.29.149.119|108.29.149.119]] ([[User talk:108.29.149.119|talk]]) 02:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:It is listed as such at [[Stanley Kubrick filmography#Feature films]]. I am not sure why we have the other 12 in table format here since the link to the filmography article is sufficient. I would suggest removing this table. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]]|[[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 04:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
: [[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> I agree with {{u|MarnetteD}}. I've [[WP:BOLD|boldly]] removed the relevant table in whole. —[[User:Sirdog|<span style="color:#058700">'''Sirdog'''</span> ]]([[User talk:Sirdog|talk]]) 05:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== The use of "filmmaker" == |
|||
My edit has been {{diff||1151340356||reverted}}. Why can't the lead sentence say "American filmmaker"? I'm confused. I've already discussed this with FMSky before (see [[User talk:FMSky#About the use of "Filmmaker" in the infobox]]). [[User:Thedarkknightli|Thedarkknightli]] ([[User talk:Thedarkknightli|talk]]) 13:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:It's in the second sentence, the first seems fine as is. [[User:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]) 13:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Change " "big bang"; " in 4th paragraph to " "big bang;" " |
|||
Grammar error [[User:Charliegoose|Charliegoose]] ([[User talk:Charliegoose|talk]]) 05:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> it's correct [[User:Hyphenation Expert|Hyphenation Expert]] ([[User talk:Hyphenation Expert|talk]]) 07:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein == |
|||
search: |
|||
:*Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/2601:646:201:480:4690:5278:E18F:5E4B|2601:646:201:480:4690:5278:E18F:5E4B]] ([[User talk:2601:646:201:480:4690:5278:E18F:5E4B|talk]]) 07:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== potential missing word == |
== potential missing word == |
||
Line 106: | Line 79: | ||
:I vote for the '''[and]''' option. I think that sounds great! [[User:Georgelazenby|Georgelazenby]] ([[User talk:Georgelazenby|talk]]) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
:I vote for the '''[and]''' option. I think that sounds great! [[User:Georgelazenby|Georgelazenby]] ([[User talk:Georgelazenby|talk]]) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." [[User:BillyShearsss|BillyShearsss]] ([[User talk:BillyShearsss|talk]]) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. [[User:EphemeralPerpetuals|<span style="font: small-caps 15px times; color:#CC5500">EphemeralPerpetuals <small>(they/them)</small></span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:EphemeralPerpetuals|<b style="font: small-caps 12px times; color:#000000">talk</b>]]</sup> 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Barry Lyndon: Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens == |
|||
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. [[Special:Contributions/202.190.25.42|202.190.25.42]] ([[User talk:202.190.25.42|talk]]) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 [[User:Andyamo72|Andyamo72]] ([[User talk:Andyamo72|talk]]) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> <code><nowiki>'''[[</nowiki>'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> ([[User talk:CanonNi|talk]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/CanonNi|contribs]]) 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Not done. What do you want this to be used as a source ''for''? [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==AFI== |
|||
{{Edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=yes}} |
|||
About ''The Shining'', the article states "and the American Film Institute has ranked it as the 27th greatest thriller film of all time". I'm pretty sure it's at #29 and not #27. Also, I suggest adding "in 2001", since the ranking is from that year. And maybe include an internal link to [[AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills]], for instance the text "has ranked it". --[[Special:Contributions/62.166.252.25|62.166.252.25]] ([[User talk:62.166.252.25|talk]]) 11:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> I confirmed that 29 is correct with the existing source and also made these other changes, thanks. [[User:Jamedeus|Jamedeus]] ([[User talk:Jamedeus|talk]]) 15:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks. --[[Special:Contributions/62.166.252.25|62.166.252.25]] ([[User talk:62.166.252.25|talk]]) 19:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:19, 25 May 2024
Stanley Kubrick has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
potential missing word
Current quote: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." Possibilities: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films [that|which] broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." or "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground [and] are now considered landmarks." or something else! 213.120.28.36 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I vote for the [and] option. I think that sounds great! Georgelazenby (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." BillyShearsss (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)talk 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Barry Lyndon: Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. 202.190.25.42 (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024
Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 Andyamo72 (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. What do you want this to be used as a source for? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
AFI
About The Shining, the article states "and the American Film Institute has ranked it as the 27th greatest thriller film of all time". I'm pretty sure it's at #29 and not #27. Also, I suggest adding "in 2001", since the ranking is from that year. And maybe include an internal link to AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills, for instance the text "has ranked it". --62.166.252.25 (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)