actually, honestly, I don't think any good is being done by keeping these sections unarchived, so archive them manually; reset minthreadsleft back to 5 and update archive counter for future messages; I got to this talk page through a comment at Help talk:Archiving a talk page Tag: Replaced |
62.166.252.25 (talk) |
||
(28 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age= |
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=180|archive_units=days|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}} |
||
{{American English}} |
{{American English}} |
||
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}} |
|||
{{Round in circles|search=yes}} |
|||
{{Article history |
{{Article history |
||
|action1=FAC |
|action1=FAC |
||
Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
|topic=film |
|topic=film |
||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=People|class=GA}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-priority=Top |filmbio-work-group=yes }} |
||
{{WikiProject Chess|importance=Bottom}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Hertfordshire|importance=High}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{WP1.0 |v0.7=pass |class=GA |category=Langlit |importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
Line 46: | Line 43: | ||
|counter = 15 |
|counter = 15 |
||
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(180d) |
||
|archive = Talk:Stanley Kubrick/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:Stanley Kubrick/Archive %(counter)d |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Calm|#FFCCCC}} |
|||
{{Press |
{{Press |
||
|collapsed=no |
|collapsed=no |
||
Line 69: | Line 67: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{annual readership}} |
{{annual readership}} |
||
{{Tmbox |
|||
== potential missing word == |
|||
| text = There have been numerous previous discussions about inclusion of an infobox in this article. Before discussing, or starting a new RfC, please review the discussions listed below. {{ulist |
|||
| August 2015 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_7#No_Infobox|"No Infobox"]]; result: '''consensus against including an infobox'''. |
|||
Current quote: |
|||
| January 2017 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_9#RfC:_Should_an_infobox_be_added_to_this_page?|"Should an infobox be added to this page?"]]; result: '''no consensus'''. |
|||
"Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." |
|||
| 2017–2018 [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_10|additional non-RfC discussions]]. |
|||
Possibilities: |
|||
| October 2018 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_11#RfC:_Should_a_collapsible_infobox_be_added_to_this_page?|"Should a collapsible infobox be added to this page?"]]; result: '''consensus against including a collapsible infobox'''. |
|||
"Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films '''[that|which]''' broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." |
|||
| September 2019 RfC: [[Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Archive_12#Rfc:_Should_an_Infobox_be_added?|"Should an Infobox be added?"]]; result: '''no consensus'''. This discussion was followed by a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanction]] prohibiting further infobox discussions until September 2021 ([[Special:Diff/915694845|diff]]) |
|||
<u>or</u> |
|||
| November 2021 RfC: [[#RFC: Infobox or not|"RFC: Infobox or not"]]; result: '''consensus for including an uncollapsed infobox'''. |
|||
"Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground '''[and]''' are now considered landmarks." |
|||
}} |
|||
or something else! [[Special:Contributions/213.120.28.36|213.120.28.36]] ([[User talk:213.120.28.36|talk]]) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
:I vote for the '''[and]''' option. I think that sounds great! [[User:Georgelazenby|Georgelazenby]] ([[User talk:Georgelazenby|talk]]) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024 == |
|||
{{Edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=yes}} |
|||
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." [[User:BillyShearsss|BillyShearsss]] ([[User talk:BillyShearsss|talk]]) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. [[User:EphemeralPerpetuals|<span style="font: small-caps 15px times; color:#CC5500">EphemeralPerpetuals <small>(they/them)</small></span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:EphemeralPerpetuals|<b style="font: small-caps 12px times; color:#000000">talk</b>]]</sup> 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Barry Lyndon: Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens == |
|||
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. [[Special:Contributions/202.190.25.42|202.190.25.42]] ([[User talk:202.190.25.42|talk]]) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024 == |
|||
{{Edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=yes}} |
|||
Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 [[User:Andyamo72|Andyamo72]] ([[User talk:Andyamo72|talk]]) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> <code><nowiki>'''[[</nowiki>'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> ([[User talk:CanonNi|talk]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/CanonNi|contribs]]) 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Not done. What do you want this to be used as a source ''for''? [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==AFI== |
|||
{{Edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=yes}} |
|||
About ''The Shining'', the article states "and the American Film Institute has ranked it as the 27th greatest thriller film of all time". I'm pretty sure it's at #29 and not #27. Also, I suggest adding "in 2001", since the ranking is from that year. And maybe include an internal link to [[AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills]], for instance the text "has ranked it". --[[Special:Contributions/62.166.252.25|62.166.252.25]] ([[User talk:62.166.252.25|talk]]) 11:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> I confirmed that 29 is correct with the existing source and also made these other changes, thanks. [[User:Jamedeus|Jamedeus]] ([[User talk:Jamedeus|talk]]) 15:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks. --[[Special:Contributions/62.166.252.25|62.166.252.25]] ([[User talk:62.166.252.25|talk]]) 19:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:19, 25 May 2024
![]() | Stanley Kubrick has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
potential missing word
Current quote: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." Possibilities: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films [that|which] broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." or "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground [and] are now considered landmarks." or something else! 213.120.28.36 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I vote for the [and] option. I think that sounds great! Georgelazenby (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." BillyShearsss (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done: The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)talk 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Barry Lyndon: Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. 202.190.25.42 (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024
Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 Andyamo72 (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Done
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. What do you want this to be used as a source for? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
AFI
About The Shining, the article states "and the American Film Institute has ranked it as the 27th greatest thriller film of all time". I'm pretty sure it's at #29 and not #27. Also, I suggest adding "in 2001", since the ranking is from that year. And maybe include an internal link to AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills, for instance the text "has ranked it". --62.166.252.25 (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)