Academic Journals Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Business Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Springer Nature suggested changes/COI
{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:
- For edit requests relating to a conflict of interest, please use {{edit COI}}.
- If you are partially-blocked from editing the page, please use {{edit partially-blocked}}.
- If the page is protected, use one of the following:
If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.
I would like to propose a few changes to Springer Nature. The article is partly outdated and marked as a stub. As I am working in the Communications team at Springer Nature, I’m aware that this constitutes a COI. For this reason, I have created a new version with suggested changes in my Sandbox to be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Birgit_at_Springer_Nature/sandbox/Springer_Nature. I would like to ask the community to review the suggested changes and, if approved, to mirror the changes on Springer Nature. I would appreciate your help in enriching this page with updated information and references. Kind regards, --Birgit at Springer Nature (talk) 10:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Accepted Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, reviewed therefore marking as done/closed --𝔏92934923525 (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Update Article
Dear all,
I would like to suggest updating facts and figures in the article.
Please note that I have a financial conflict of interest as I am being paid by Springer Nature Group. Therefore, I will not make any edits myself but hope that uninvolved editors could review my suggestions and make changes if they find them appropriate.
Extended content
| ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suggested changes to the Introduction section:
Suggested changes to the Infobox:
|
I greatly appreciate everybody's time and help with this! Thanks in advance,Conandcon (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Conandcon: since this information is already there, but simply outdated, feel free to make the changes yourself. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, marking as closed/done --𝔏92934923525 (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Article title
Dear all, Please note that I have a financial conflict of interest as I am being paid by Springer Nature Group. Therefore, I will not make any edits myself.
I would like to suggest to change the title of the article to "Springer Nature Group". "Springer Nature" today is only one division of the company and the name therefore does not to reflect the current set-up of the Group of companies. The different subsidiaries/brands of the group are described e.g. in this fact sheet at the bottom of the first page. The current logo in the article also is the logo of the division "Springer Nature". This also counts for the current website in the info box, which should lead to https://group.springernature.com/it/group
@Headbomb: Would you be willing to give me feedback on my suggestions? What do you think? Thank you! Best, Conandcon (talk) 14:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, can be closed I guess. --𝔏92934923525 (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Corona - Zheng-Li Shi
Hi, there exists a certain 'flame' about Zheng-Li Shi and her research published on Nature. However, this page is about the company. "Researcher and author Zheng-Li Shi contributed much of her Coronavirus related activities in Nature." is not ideal IMHO, correcting myself. There are many more researchers contributing to the magazine which certainly have similar attention in other areas, I could think of CRISPR. This is a very general situation of the magazines or scientific publication in general, frameworks for critique, etc.--𝔏92934923525 (talk) 08:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Merger
This really ought to be merged with Springer Science+Business Media. Essentially, Springer Verlag expanded, renamed itself Springer Science+Business Media, expanded more, and renamed itself Springer Nature. Look at springer.com from ten years ago versus today — the logo's the same. According to the SN article, the SS+BM chief became the SN chief after the creation of SN. This isn't a matter of merging articles of subsidiary and a parent, as if we merged Palgrave Macmillan into this article (or merged BNSF Railway and Pampered Chef into Berkshire Hathaway), or a matter of merging unrelated entities with similar names, as if we merged Springer Publishing here. They're essentially the same entity with essentially the same name, and there's no real reason for keeping them separate. Nyttend backup (talk) 13:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, agree with that. Springer S+B seems very similar in scope and content. I would however rename the whole package as Springer Nature Group if that is the full, official name now and sub-section and sub-refactor the contents. I currently have other tasks, so cannot do it, but support it. --17387349L8764 (talk) 08:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Copying Wikipedia?
So this publishing company has had multiple controversies. Has it been caught copying Wikipedia? To another page,[1] I just added a reference that uses this company as a publisher. Now I'll probably change the reference. ApproximateLand (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)