Content deleted Content added
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* "'''Charges'''"''' section'''. The "Charges" section is unnecessary in my view, and it should fall under the "ICTY indictment" section. |
* "'''Charges'''"''' section'''. The "Charges" section is unnecessary in my view, and it should fall under the "ICTY indictment" section. |
||
--<font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 08:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC) |
--<font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 08:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
:The lead section must mention the ICTY trial per lead policy, the rest (categories etc.) were caught in the edit and couldn't care less about. [[User:PRODUCER|PRODUCER]] ([[User talk:PRODUCER|talk]]) 19:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:45, 21 August 2009
![]() | Biography Stub‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | Croatia Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
How many years did he get?
How long does he have to stay behind bars? --84.56.250.27 (talk) 10:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Mediation?
I notice there's an edit-war on this article, and would like to help resolve the issue by offering informal mediation, provided of course, that both PRODUCER and Àntó consider me impartial. Until you guys get unblocked, I'll just say that this doesn't look like a very tough dispute, and that I'm sure it can be resolved relatively quickly. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 10:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, let us see where the problem is:
- If you take a look at edit history you will see the following:
- PRODUCER has removed category "People from Čapljina"- [1][2][3] Why??
- PRODUCER has removed category "Croats of Bosnia and Herzegovina"- Why?
- PRODUCER has removed link to Praljak personal website-Why?? What is wrong with that?
- About Sections:
- I did not erased this link . I just placed it in another section.
- Sentence "Slobodan Praljak is among six accused by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), in relation to the Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia." is written below with that source and it is absolutely necessary to repeat it twice.
- 2 Section "indicment" and "charges" are totally meaningless because that is the same thing.
- PRODUCER'S modus oprandi here seems to be deleteing everything that he dislikes. no mather what collateral damage might be done.As in many other articles before. --Añtó| Àntó (talk) 06:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
First of all: STOP edit-warring - you will get blocked for a long time. This version can stand for a while. Here's how I see it, there are a number of issues:
- Categories. All the categories, if they're correct of course, should stay.
- Personal website. As far as I know, a link to his personal website in the "External links" section is ok.
- Lead. The lead is supposed to repeat the content of the article. There is no reason to remove the text about his indictment from the lead.
- "Charges" section. The "Charges" section is unnecessary in my view, and it should fall under the "ICTY indictment" section.