Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Pass |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Visual arts|cat=|class=}} |
{{Visual arts|cat=|class=}} |
||
{{GA}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Japan}} |
{{WikiProject Japan}} |
||
{{LGBTProject | class=Start}} |
{{LGBTProject | class=Start}} |
Revision as of 04:20, 3 April 2007
Visual arts Unassessed | |||||||
|
Japan Unassessed | |||||||||||||||||
|
LGBT studies Start‑class | |||||||
|
Article Expansion
I've added a lot to this article - generally I'm quite pleased with what I've been able to do. However, out of fear of conflict, the references section is perhaps a bit excessive, not least because a lot of my citations are the same Helsinki Art Museum book. Would someone mind checking through and removing references next to statements that they do not feel will be questioned by many people?
I also feel that it would be nice if it were rated higher than start class now. Gosh, I hope this article is on someone's watch list.
Please let me know if you think some of the points I've raised in the new article are a bit pedantic. Genre classification may be one of them. Rupa zero 23:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)