Songs Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Nathan Johnson (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
– Only "Sex Bomb" with an article. Unreal7 (talk) 14:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - The fact that there is only one song article does not justify enough reason to abandon the precise "(song)" dab. "Sex bomb" is of course ambiguous, and it could be a slang for an attractive, sexy person. Sometimes, I do or do not associate the phrase with Tom Jones. --George Ho (talk) 22:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support; no other topic in the encyclopedia has this exact title, so there's no need to disambiguate it. Powers T 01:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose – the disambig page documents the ambiguity and dispatches to the relevant articles. There's no explanation for why one topic would be considered primary here; the fact that other articles do not use this title notwithstanding. It would be better to fully disambiguate the songs. Dicklyon (talk) 02:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- 'Oppose' per Dicklyon. You haven't proved primarity. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose oft-used expression, but not to describe the song. So it's too generic to hog an undisambiguated namespace, IMHO. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 08:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Sex Bomb (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522140605/http://www.austriancharts.at/2000_single.asp to http://www.austriancharts.at/2000_single.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308100824/http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=2000 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=2000
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131015012630/http://hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=2000 to http://hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=2000
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5nDfynkk6?url=http://www.ifpi.at/?section=goldplatin to http://www.ifpi.at/?section=goldplatin
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120223160128/http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/monopage.xml?id=259165&year=2000&type=7 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/monopage.xml?id=259165&year=2000&type=7
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081217100529/http://d12753932.u160.foretag.surftown.se/wp-content/uploads/ar-2000.pdf to http://d12753932.u160.foretag.surftown.se/wp-content/uploads/ar-2000.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 11 June 2018
– Hoping that five years later we've seen some sense. Unreal7 (talk) 20:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Here is a pageview analysis, although it hardly seems necessary. If a reader goes to the trouble of capitalizing the "B", it's a safe they want the song. Nine Zulu queens (talk) 03:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support Per the above. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support. There's no other article on WP that could use the title. Station1 (talk) 06:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Wikt might have the " oft-used expression". That's what Wikt is for. No other article with this title. Re-assess when there is even one. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 17:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Seems obvious PT. — JFG talk 15:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Although there are multiple pages for songs called "Sex Bomb", this is probably the most well-known "Sex Bomb" out there. Putting (song) next to the title seems redundant. Nowmusicfan2816 any questions? 11:34, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- There are 3 other songs with this title listed at the DAB page. But none of them has it's own "page"? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry you're right. I visited the page before and didn't notice that. Nowmusicfan2816 any questions? 13:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)