1234567890PPPP (talk | contribs) m TRUTH |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} |
|||
DONT LISTEN TO OTHERS ONLY WHAT IS RIGHT I SPEAK TRUTH SHE USES HER CHILD AS AN A TICKET TO DO WHAT EVER SHE WANTS THINK ABOUT IT SHES A TEMPLAR |
|||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{ArticleHistory |
|||
|action1=GAN |
|||
|action1date=15:05, 25 September 2008 |
|||
|action1link=Talk:Sarah Palin/GA1 |
|||
|action1result=not listed |
|||
|action1oldid=240908335 |
|||
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|||
|topic=Politics and government |
|||
}} |
|||
<!-- please do not remove this tag --> |
|||
{{pp-move-indef}} |
|||
<!--{{Notice|1=This talk page is semi-protected due the excessive vandalism as well as [[WP:BLP|living people issues]]. If you want to request an edit on Palin's page click [[WP:RFED|here]] instead.}}--> |
|||
{{controversial}} |
|||
{{pbneutral}} |
|||
{{Round in circles|search=yes}} |
|||
{{FAQ}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=B|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=High|listas=Palin, Sarah}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Politics|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Alaska|class=B|importance=High}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=B|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject United States|class=B|importance=low|USgovernors=yes|USgovernors-importance=low|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=High|ID=Yes|ID-importance=Low|listas=Palin, Sarah}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Beauty Pageants|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{pressmulti |
|||
| title= Wikipedia Edits Forecast Vice Presidential Picks |
|||
| author= Brian Krebs |
|||
| date= August 29, 2008 |
|||
| url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/29/AR2008082902691.html |
|||
| org= ''[[The Washington Post]]'' |
|||
| title2= Palin's Wikipedia Entry Gets Overhaul |
|||
| author2= Yuki Noguchi |
|||
| date2= August 29, 2008 |
|||
| url2= http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyid=94118849 |
|||
| org2= [[NPR]] |
|||
| title3= Tug of war over Wiki entry on Palin |
|||
| author3= Chris O'Brien |
|||
| date3= August 29, 2008 |
|||
| url3= http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_10338833 |
|||
| org3= ''[[San Jose Mercury News]]'' |
|||
| title4= Sarah Palin Wikipedia edits--fast and furious |
|||
| author4= Natalie Weinstein |
|||
| date4= August 30, 2008 |
|||
| url4= http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10029598-38.html |
|||
| org4= [[CNET News]] |
|||
| title5= Don’t Like Palin’s Wikipedia Story? Change It |
|||
| author5= Noam Cohen |
|||
| date5= September 1, 2008 |
|||
| url5= http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/01/technology/01link.html |
|||
| org5= ''[[The New York Times]]'' |
|||
| url6= http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10029598-38.html |
|||
| org6= [[CNET News]] |
|||
| title7= Sarah Palin's immensely flattering Wikipedia entry |
|||
| author7= Jemima Kiss |
|||
| date7= September 1, 2008 |
|||
| url7= http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/digitalcontent/2008/09/sarah_palins_immensely_flatter.html |
|||
| org7= ''[[The Guardian]]'' |
|||
| title8= Sarah Palin Wikipedia entry gets glowing make-over from mysterious user Young Trigg |
|||
| author8= Mike Harvey |
|||
| date8= September 1, 2008 |
|||
| url8= http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4653971.ece |
|||
| org8= ''[[The Times]]'' |
|||
| title9= Wikipedia e la biografia “ripulita” di Sarah Palin |
|||
| author9= Roberto Reale |
|||
| date9= September 2, 2008 |
|||
| url9= http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/rainews24_2007/magazine/scenari/scenari_estate_09.asp |
|||
| org9= [[RAI]] |
|||
| title10= Wikipedia war emerges over details about Palin |
|||
| author10= Mark Sabbatini |
|||
| date10= September 2, 2008 |
|||
| url10= http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/090208/sta_326628504.shtml |
|||
| org10= ''[[Juneau Empire]]'' |
|||
| title11= Who scrubbed Palin clean? |
|||
| author11= Iain Simons |
|||
| date11= September 2, 2008 |
|||
| url11= http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/culture-tech/2008/09/usa-vote-palin-wikipedia |
|||
| org11=''[[New Statesman]]'' |
|||
| title12= The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin II: The Bridge To Nowhere |
|||
| author12= Andrew Sullivan |
|||
| date12= September 15, 2008 |
|||
| url12=http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/the-lies-of-s-2.html |
|||
| org12=[[The Daily Dish]] |
|||
| title13= Sarah Palin winning the Wikipedia popularity contest |
|||
| author13= Stephanie Condon |
|||
| date13= September 17, 2008 |
|||
| url13=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10044085-38.html |
|||
| org13=[[CNET News]] |
|||
| title14=Why Google's online encyclopedia will never be as good as Wikipedia |
|||
| date14=September 22, 2008 |
|||
| url14=http://www.slate.com/id/2200401/ |
|||
| org14=''[[Slate]]'' |
|||
| author14=Farhad Manjool |
|||
| title15= Updating a Reference Site on the Fly |
|||
| author15= Noam Cohen |
|||
| date15= November 9, 2008 |
|||
| url15= http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/technology/internet/10link.html |
|||
| org15= ''[[The New York Times]]'' |
|||
|author16=(none) |
|||
|date16=August 17, 2009 |
|||
|url16=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Wikipedia-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html |
|||
|title16=The 50 most-viewed Wikipedia articles in 2009 and 2008 |
|||
|org16=''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Auto archiving notice|age=30 |
|||
|index=./Archive index |
|||
|bot=MiszaBot}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|||
|counter = 65 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|||
|algo = old(30d) |
|||
|archive = Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
|||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|||
|target=Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive index |
|||
|mask=Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive <#> |
|||
|leading_zeros=0 |
|||
|indexhere=yes}} |
|||
== Media invokes Trigg Palin into likeability of Palin == |
|||
KICK ME OFF IF U WANT BUT IM TRUTH |
|||
I, as many, feel that children are off limits in campaigns. However, I see this reintroduction of Sarah Palin's [[Down Syndrome]] child as a relaunch of the social issue into the 2012 presidential election. This is essentially the dog whistle for [[Rick Santorum]] to ignite the issue. I would like to propose an article section for Palin, taking this idea from a hunch, or opinion, to a NPOV; The bias of my interest, and expression of, in this topic is being held in check. I would like input on this as I await the anticipated more reputable coverage of the issue than the Fox News August 12, 2012 interview with Palin. Further more, an accurate or appropriate description of the difficulties of families with Down's children has not done justice. Arguably this expression on her son was personal; but, with the presentation on a political site it is now justifiably, political. |
|||
An interview segment; ....I believe that Paul Ryan will certainly be scrutinized. He will be vetted but there is a lot of us who will have his back and we will call out the media for their lies, for their distortions as they try to thrash his reputation and his record," Sarah Palin said on FOX News on Sunday... |
|||
The concluding of brash statements with a likeability plug is a classic tool developed by media social scientist and the message should be taken in its entirety. |
|||
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/08/12/palin_on_media_scrutinizing_paul_ryan_a_lot_of_us_will_have_his_back.html |
|||
[[User:Wikipietime|Wikipietime]] ([[User talk:Wikipietime|talk]]) 15:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:Im not sure what you would like to change about this article, but, the likeability of Palin, Trigg, Rick Santorum and the like is all clearly [[WP:OR]]. Please remember, [[WP:FORUM]]. [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 22:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Game Change == |
|||
I scoured all the Sarah Palin articles and it appears Game Change, which won a bevy of awards as a breakdown of the McCain/Palin campaign based upon the book, bears no mention anywhere in the collected Sarah Palin articles. Have any attempts been made to include this information? My history checks didn't see anything, if not then it should most appropriately be included in the Public Image article, I think. [[User:Revrant|Revrant]] ([[User talk:Revrant|talk]]) 06:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:From my recollection, this topic came up when the ''Game Change'' book was initially published. The main issue was that the book had a lot of sensational claims (which were later apparently included in the film). The claims about Palin were anonymously sourced, and were specifically denied on the record by a lot of people, including McCain, a bunch of campaign advisors, and Palin herself. The consensus was that we couldn't include this info per the BLP policy. A similiar discussion was had here when the Joe McGinnis book was published. Policy generally was to include the info in the articles about the books/films themselves without placing them in the BLP. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 15:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::I don't think politicians denying things amounts to a credible source nor a reason to eject information pertaining to them from their articles, and going by that metric there's a lot of fluff that shouldn't be in her articles and especially in her Public Image article. [[User:Revrant|Revrant]] ([[User talk:Revrant|talk]]) 09:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::The problem is that there is no credible source for the allegations themselves either. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 15:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Track Palin and Britta File for Divorce == |
|||
We should note that Track Palin and his wife Britta have [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/2012/12/12/sarah-palin-oldest-son-track-files-for-divorce/CKEnqc47Bw0rWGbOeBib5N/story.html filed for a divorce], though they have a 16-month child at the time of that filing.<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MaynardClark|MaynardClark]] ([[User talk:MaynardClark|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MaynardClark|contribs]]) 0422, 13 December 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|||
:Why? [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 07:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::Exactly. Neither of them are public figures. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 09:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::Well, they shouldn't be notable, but Sarah Palin comes from that area of politics that claims an image of wholesome, sweet, traditional family life. Such pollies draw attention to their kids as part of their own image. That's why people notice when things don't quite stay in the mould of the wholesome, sweet, traditional family life. When things are running smoothly, Palin and her supporters would be delighted to have the lives of the children mentioned, but probably not now. I'm happy to move forward to the position that really, what the kids do is irrelevant, or ought to be, but Bonewah and Kelly, you asked. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 09:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::Let's move along, then. This is not a bio of Track Palin, it's a bio of his mother. We don't discuss, for example, [[Carrie Fisher]]'s divorce in the article on [[Debbie Reynolds]], and we don't discuss Al Gore III's legal troubles in [[Al Gore]]. I've been consistent on this; if you recall, I also opposed mentioning the marriage, because it's not relevant to ''Sarah Palin'', the subject of the article. ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sarah_Palin&diff=432104020&oldid=432084212 I started a discussion in June 2011 on the topic].) Snide references to Palin's "wholesome, sweet, traditional family life" and imputations of the motivations of other editors don't make editing any more collegial, HiLo48; please use a little more discretion and tact when discussing people you don't like. '''[[User:Horologium|<font color="#112233">Horologium</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Horologium|(talk)]]</small> 14:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I made no comment at all on the motivations of other editors. I did comment on the self-chosen image of politicians (about most of whom I'm cynical), and if you can fault my observation, please do so, but it has nothing to do with who I like or don't like. I didn't report on the divorce. The media did. I attempted to explain why. Oh, and I make equally cynical observations about almost all politicians. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 17:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::If only we were all under the public microscope such that all our mistakes and shortfalls were equally over-scrutinized... Either way, it isn't something that is notable enough for this page. [[User:Ckruschke|Ckruschke]] ([[User talk:Ckruschke|talk]]) 18:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Ckruschke |
|||
:::::::If only, indeed. Aside from the fact that this is irrelevant to her bio, I think it's important to remember that her children, (or the children of any politician or celebrity), are still private citizens who deserve to have their privacy respected. I find it sad that news agencies don't follow the standards set by the Society of Professional Journalists, regarding these matters, but I feel that, as an encyclopedia, we should strive for more news-worthy information rather than sinking to tabloid-style reporting. Its the mob-mentality that makes it seem ok to go after someone's family or friends to try and get to them, and that makes it far too easy to forget that the pawns in this game are actual human beings. [[User:Zaereth|Zaereth]] ([[User talk:Zaereth|talk]]) 22:38, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Sarah's ex daughter in law == |
|||
Track is no longer married to her. Can someone change that section of the article to say she was his ex or former wife? http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/track-palin-wife-divorcing-article-1.1218884 [[Special:Contributions/108.93.72.117|108.93.72.117]] ([[User talk:108.93.72.117|talk]]) 23:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:I see this was already covered above. Disregard my message, though I still think the wording is inaccurate now. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.93.72.117|108.93.72.117]] ([[User talk:108.93.72.117|talk]]) 23:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 23:22, 22 January 2013
Sarah Palin was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Media invokes Trigg Palin into likeability of Palin
I, as many, feel that children are off limits in campaigns. However, I see this reintroduction of Sarah Palin's Down Syndrome child as a relaunch of the social issue into the 2012 presidential election. This is essentially the dog whistle for Rick Santorum to ignite the issue. I would like to propose an article section for Palin, taking this idea from a hunch, or opinion, to a NPOV; The bias of my interest, and expression of, in this topic is being held in check. I would like input on this as I await the anticipated more reputable coverage of the issue than the Fox News August 12, 2012 interview with Palin. Further more, an accurate or appropriate description of the difficulties of families with Down's children has not done justice. Arguably this expression on her son was personal; but, with the presentation on a political site it is now justifiably, political.
An interview segment; ....I believe that Paul Ryan will certainly be scrutinized. He will be vetted but there is a lot of us who will have his back and we will call out the media for their lies, for their distortions as they try to thrash his reputation and his record," Sarah Palin said on FOX News on Sunday...
The concluding of brash statements with a likeability plug is a classic tool developed by media social scientist and the message should be taken in its entirety.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/08/12/palin_on_media_scrutinizing_paul_ryan_a_lot_of_us_will_have_his_back.html Wikipietime (talk) 15:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Im not sure what you would like to change about this article, but, the likeability of Palin, Trigg, Rick Santorum and the like is all clearly WP:OR. Please remember, WP:FORUM. Bonewah (talk) 22:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Game Change
I scoured all the Sarah Palin articles and it appears Game Change, which won a bevy of awards as a breakdown of the McCain/Palin campaign based upon the book, bears no mention anywhere in the collected Sarah Palin articles. Have any attempts been made to include this information? My history checks didn't see anything, if not then it should most appropriately be included in the Public Image article, I think. Revrant (talk) 06:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- From my recollection, this topic came up when the Game Change book was initially published. The main issue was that the book had a lot of sensational claims (which were later apparently included in the film). The claims about Palin were anonymously sourced, and were specifically denied on the record by a lot of people, including McCain, a bunch of campaign advisors, and Palin herself. The consensus was that we couldn't include this info per the BLP policy. A similiar discussion was had here when the Joe McGinnis book was published. Policy generally was to include the info in the articles about the books/films themselves without placing them in the BLP. Kelly hi! 15:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think politicians denying things amounts to a credible source nor a reason to eject information pertaining to them from their articles, and going by that metric there's a lot of fluff that shouldn't be in her articles and especially in her Public Image article. Revrant (talk) 09:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Track Palin and Britta File for Divorce
We should note that Track Palin and his wife Britta have filed for a divorce, though they have a 16-month child at the time of that filing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MaynardClark (talk • contribs) 0422, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Why? Bonewah (talk) 07:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Exactly. Neither of them are public figures. Kelly hi! 09:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Well, they shouldn't be notable, but Sarah Palin comes from that area of politics that claims an image of wholesome, sweet, traditional family life. Such pollies draw attention to their kids as part of their own image. That's why people notice when things don't quite stay in the mould of the wholesome, sweet, traditional family life. When things are running smoothly, Palin and her supporters would be delighted to have the lives of the children mentioned, but probably not now. I'm happy to move forward to the position that really, what the kids do is irrelevant, or ought to be, but Bonewah and Kelly, you asked. HiLo48 (talk) 09:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Let's move along, then. This is not a bio of Track Palin, it's a bio of his mother. We don't discuss, for example, Carrie Fisher's divorce in the article on Debbie Reynolds, and we don't discuss Al Gore III's legal troubles in Al Gore. I've been consistent on this; if you recall, I also opposed mentioning the marriage, because it's not relevant to Sarah Palin, the subject of the article. (I started a discussion in June 2011 on the topic.) Snide references to Palin's "wholesome, sweet, traditional family life" and imputations of the motivations of other editors don't make editing any more collegial, HiLo48; please use a little more discretion and tact when discussing people you don't like. Horologium (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- I made no comment at all on the motivations of other editors. I did comment on the self-chosen image of politicians (about most of whom I'm cynical), and if you can fault my observation, please do so, but it has nothing to do with who I like or don't like. I didn't report on the divorce. The media did. I attempted to explain why. Oh, and I make equally cynical observations about almost all politicians. HiLo48 (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Let's move along, then. This is not a bio of Track Palin, it's a bio of his mother. We don't discuss, for example, Carrie Fisher's divorce in the article on Debbie Reynolds, and we don't discuss Al Gore III's legal troubles in Al Gore. I've been consistent on this; if you recall, I also opposed mentioning the marriage, because it's not relevant to Sarah Palin, the subject of the article. (I started a discussion in June 2011 on the topic.) Snide references to Palin's "wholesome, sweet, traditional family life" and imputations of the motivations of other editors don't make editing any more collegial, HiLo48; please use a little more discretion and tact when discussing people you don't like. Horologium (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Well, they shouldn't be notable, but Sarah Palin comes from that area of politics that claims an image of wholesome, sweet, traditional family life. Such pollies draw attention to their kids as part of their own image. That's why people notice when things don't quite stay in the mould of the wholesome, sweet, traditional family life. When things are running smoothly, Palin and her supporters would be delighted to have the lives of the children mentioned, but probably not now. I'm happy to move forward to the position that really, what the kids do is irrelevant, or ought to be, but Bonewah and Kelly, you asked. HiLo48 (talk) 09:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Exactly. Neither of them are public figures. Kelly hi! 09:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- If only, indeed. Aside from the fact that this is irrelevant to her bio, I think it's important to remember that her children, (or the children of any politician or celebrity), are still private citizens who deserve to have their privacy respected. I find it sad that news agencies don't follow the standards set by the Society of Professional Journalists, regarding these matters, but I feel that, as an encyclopedia, we should strive for more news-worthy information rather than sinking to tabloid-style reporting. Its the mob-mentality that makes it seem ok to go after someone's family or friends to try and get to them, and that makes it far too easy to forget that the pawns in this game are actual human beings. Zaereth (talk) 22:38, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Sarah's ex daughter in law
Track is no longer married to her. Can someone change that section of the article to say she was his ex or former wife? http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/track-palin-wife-divorcing-article-1.1218884 108.93.72.117 (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)