99.109.125.100 (talk) →Add reference?: new section |
Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) →Add reference?: Why? |
||
Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
*[http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/07/15/sarah-palin-still-waiting-for-romney-invite-to-tampa.html Romney’s Palin Problem: Where’s Her Convention Invite?] "[[Mitt Romney|Mitt]] still hasn’t invited Sarah to the GOP’s nomination [[2012 Republican National Convention|assembly in Tampa]], and [[Tea Party movement|the Tea Party]] is livid. Peter J. Boyer on how the snub could sabotage Romney’s tenuous ties to the grassroots—and why [[Sarah Palin|Palin]] is keeping the week open, just in case." Jul 16, 2012 [[NewsWeek]] (pages 36 to 38 in-print), from [[Talk:Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012]] |
*[http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/07/15/sarah-palin-still-waiting-for-romney-invite-to-tampa.html Romney’s Palin Problem: Where’s Her Convention Invite?] "[[Mitt Romney|Mitt]] still hasn’t invited Sarah to the GOP’s nomination [[2012 Republican National Convention|assembly in Tampa]], and [[Tea Party movement|the Tea Party]] is livid. Peter J. Boyer on how the snub could sabotage Romney’s tenuous ties to the grassroots—and why [[Sarah Palin|Palin]] is keeping the week open, just in case." Jul 16, 2012 [[NewsWeek]] (pages 36 to 38 in-print), from [[Talk:Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012]] |
||
[[Special:Contributions/99.109.125.100|99.109.125.100]] ([[User talk:99.109.125.100|talk]]) 08:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/99.109.125.100|99.109.125.100]] ([[User talk:99.109.125.100|talk]]) 08:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
:'''Why'''? — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 08:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:50, 23 July 2012
Sarah Palin was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
potential resource
Republicans for Revolution January 12, 2012 The New York Review of Books by Mark Lilla regarding The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin (by Corey Robin, publisher Oxford University Press)
See Conservatism in the United States and Reactionary 99.181.147.68 (talk) 05:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Does it have sufficient new biographical information not found currently in the BLP? Collect (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Article Correction: Sarah Palin's Granddaughter's Name
I don't really know how to submit corrections, but I was recently reading this article and noticed an error with the spelling of Palin's granddaughter's name. Under the "Personal Life" subheading, the article says, ". . . and a girl named Kayla Grace Palin, who was born to son Track and his wife, Britta, in 2011." The spelling of her granddaughter's first name is Kyla, not Kayla. The source of this information spells it correctly (http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2011/08/sarah-palin-grandmother-again-son-track-baby-kayla) although the web address spells it incorrectly. It is also verifiable on Todd Palin's 2012 Iron Dog Pro Class Team Profile and Biography (http://www.irondograce.org/race-tracking/2012-pro-class/teams/?team=10 . Please consider correcting this error. Thank you! 72.1.111.41 (talk) 00:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed it. Looks like the original source typoed. Their source actually spelled it right. - Xcal68 (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Mentioning Game Change
This film seems like a notable feature in Palin's biography. Seeing as she and most of the people portrayed in the film, including McCain, have commented on it I think it is probably worth a mention in the public image section. --Daniel 16:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Per WP:SUMMARY, the way to go would be to place something in Public image of Sarah Palin first and then summarize here. Kelly hi! 17:25, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
The original book, "Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime" (ISBN-10: 0061733636) by John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, is a better choice as a cite and a more notable feature in Mrs. Palin's biography than the movie that was based on the book. Just go to the original source. Geraldshields11 (talk) 13:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: "Long" template
Uh, there are sub-articles. Plenty of them, from the looks of it. Does that mean they've been forgotten about?RadioKAOS (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have removed the "very long" template, which is unnecessary, as there are Template:restructure, Template:overly detailed, and Template:split. --George Ho (talk) 15:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
The link to Bristol Palin's TV show, in which Sarah Palin appears, has been deleted twice from the article. All that was deleted was the link, not a paragraph or anything UNDUE. I do not want to get into an edit war, so I will open this to discussion - should a link to Bristol Palin: Life's a Tripp be in this article? Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 23:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Personally, I would have no objection to adding a link --if the information with it provides new insight about the subject. I don't like the idea of linking just for link's sake. As that addition was preiously written, it is about Bristol, and, therefore, belongs in her article. It doesn't give any info about the subject of this article. Even if Sarah Palin appeared on the show, (although that is great to put in the show's article), it seems rather trivial for this article. Of course, that's just my $0.02. Others may feel differently. Zaereth (talk) 01:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- I see no reason not to have the short sentence on Bristol that you are trying to put in. Yes the page is about Sarah, but it is not UNDUE to add a short snippet about what the children doing. Probably need the editor who is reverting your content to weigh in. Ckruschke (talk) 17:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Ckruschke
- It's become evident over the years that in the eyes of at least a few editors (effectively, an ad hoc WP:PALIN), it's all about Sarah. While a decent enough job has been done on the main article WRT undue weight, the same can't be said about any number of other articles which mention her. The attitude of these editors towards that problem has been along the lines of "yeah, whatever, that's someone else's problem, not mine."RadioKAOS (talk) 07:29, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- The article is about Sarah Palin, not her relatives. I'm not sure why we would want to include this one minor reality show when we don't include Bristol's Dancing With The Stars appearance, which was a much bigger deal ratings-wise. We also don't mention Todd Palin's activities as a racing champion or Track Palin's combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Kelly hi! 08:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- If Todd Palin, or Track Palin had their own TV show - that would that be mentionable here as well. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 14:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
To RadioKAOS, I'm not sure I understand your point. While it's true that this is the only political article I've ever worked on, that's because politics just doesn't interest me. I used this article as a starting point for entry into Wikipedia. My views on relevance and organization come not from wiki-policy, but from years of training in the field of writing. I hold the view that information should be relevant to the subject in any article I work on, be it alloys, heat treatment, lasers, swordsmithing, gravity, energy, or fighter maneuvering. It's not about what is my problem or someone else's problem, but simply is about good writing. Zaereth (talk) 19:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- If there is only one objection - I will restore the link, with short description as was written. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- While I commend you for authoring the new article on the television series, it's not really necessary to put links to that article in every subject with a remote linkage to it, like Sarah Palin, Todd Palin, and Public image of Sarah Palin. I think the links in Bristol Palin and the "see also" in Not Afraid of Life: My Journey So Far are sufficient, at least until the new reality show can be shown to have some significance or lasting impact. Kelly hi! 04:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- That seems fair for now, though I would argue that since Sarah and Todd appear in the show, it is noteworthy on their pages. Also, since there is only one dissenting voice, I am also open to other opinions as well. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 13:11, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- While I commend you for authoring the new article on the television series, it's not really necessary to put links to that article in every subject with a remote linkage to it, like Sarah Palin, Todd Palin, and Public image of Sarah Palin. I think the links in Bristol Palin and the "see also" in Not Afraid of Life: My Journey So Far are sufficient, at least until the new reality show can be shown to have some significance or lasting impact. Kelly hi! 04:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Add reference?
- Romney’s Palin Problem: Where’s Her Convention Invite? "Mitt still hasn’t invited Sarah to the GOP’s nomination assembly in Tampa, and the Tea Party is livid. Peter J. Boyer on how the snub could sabotage Romney’s tenuous ties to the grassroots—and why Palin is keeping the week open, just in case." Jul 16, 2012 NewsWeek (pages 36 to 38 in-print), from Talk:Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012
99.109.125.100 (talk) 08:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- Why? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)