Content deleted Content added
You don't understand BLP. No one is named and BLP does not apply to companies. |
Littleolive oil (talk | contribs) I'll let you revert |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
The most interesting part is how SNC paid for the son of a dictator to tour Canada hiring expensive call girls for him.<ref>https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/snc-lavalin-paid-for-gadhafi-sons-debauchery-while-he-was-in-canada-report/amp</ref> User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 05:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:This should be worked into the article somehow. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 21:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
I prefer the PM's picture. This scandal is about him, not the former AG who was allegedly pressured [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 21:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
I prefer the PM's picture. This scandal is about him, not the former AG who was allegedly pressured [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 21:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
: Editor preference does not matter. This is first, an allegation; that alone should give any Wikipedia editor pause. Wikipedia is not in the business of creating content which becomes a political soapbox. This is not about Trudeau but is an allegation which may include Trudeau. The main subject of this allegation and story is Jody Wilson-Raybould. Placing Trudeau's picture in the lead falsely places emphasis on Trudeau and this violates [[WP:UNDUE]]. But worse. It looks to me as if the content in the Trudeau article was changed from allegation to affair and then a new article created that links to "affair". Further there 's a good chance we have some meat and or sock puppets at work here. This is not a good scenario as far as Wikipedia is concerned and points to someone or someones trying to weight content against an individual. [[User:Littleolive oil|Littleolive oil]] ([[User talk:Littleolive oil|talk]]) 21:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:20, 7 March 2019
Canada Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
I prefer the PM's picture. This scandal is about him, not the former AG who was allegedly pressured Legacypac (talk) 21:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Editor preference does not matter. This is first, an allegation; that alone should give any Wikipedia editor pause. Wikipedia is not in the business of creating content which becomes a political soapbox. This is not about Trudeau but is an allegation which may include Trudeau. The main subject of this allegation and story is Jody Wilson-Raybould. Placing Trudeau's picture in the lead falsely places emphasis on Trudeau and this violates WP:UNDUE. But worse. It looks to me as if the content in the Trudeau article was changed from allegation to affair and then a new article created that links to "affair". Further there 's a good chance we have some meat and or sock puppets at work here. This is not a good scenario as far as Wikipedia is concerned and points to someone or someones trying to weight content against an individual. Littleolive oil (talk) 21:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)