Content deleted Content added
→War on Poverty: @Arzel |
|||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
:: The fix it, don't delete it! There are numerous sources that describe his plan, and many of them are critical and should be reported. As I can see that it seems no one is interested in fixing it, I will. [[User:Cwobeel|Cwobeel]] ([[User talk:Cwobeel|talk]]) 00:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
:: The fix it, don't delete it! There are numerous sources that describe his plan, and many of them are critical and should be reported. As I can see that it seems no one is interested in fixing it, I will. [[User:Cwobeel|Cwobeel]] ([[User talk:Cwobeel|talk]]) 00:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
:: {{checkmark}} It was not that hard. [[User:Cwobeel|Cwobeel]] ([[User talk:Cwobeel|talk]]) 01:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
:: {{checkmark}} It was not that hard. [[User:Cwobeel|Cwobeel]] ([[User talk:Cwobeel|talk]]) 01:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::Nothing like another chance to push your anti-Ryan POV. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel|talk]]) 04:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:59, 6 March 2014
Template:Community article probation
Paul Ryan was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
War on Poverty
- http://swampland.time.com/2014/03/03/paul-ryan-critiques-war-on-poverty-in-new-report/
- http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-03/paul-ryan-sees-799-billion-war-on-poverty-failing-poor.html
- http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-gop-budget-will-focus-on-reforming-welfare-overhauling-social-programs/2014/03/02/26b17b78-a23e-11e3-84d4-e59b1709222c_story.html
WOP is Ryan's big thing this year and the focus of his budget. Why not mention it? Hcobb (talk) 01:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- WP is not a newspaper. This is new News. There is no point in filling up a bio with everything bit of news you come across. WP:NEWSPAPER Arzel (talk) 02:13, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Are you serious? This is not not just "news". This is a report by Ryan on one of the most significant aspects of US politics, and worthy of inclusion even worth to have its own section. Cwobeel (talk) 16:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Give me a break. You add a WP:RECENT blurb using Rachel Maddow as a source. It is quite clear what you both are trying to do. Please stop using WP to push your political view. Arzel (talk) 17:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Arzel: I just read your comment, and given the recent RFC about your behavior, I'd suggest you cool it, take a break or something, and come back refreshed to collaborate with others rather than attempting a Don Quixote. If you want to safeguard the neutrality of articles, work with others, or even better, try WP:ENEMY Cwobeel (talk) 01:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Give me a break. You add a WP:RECENT blurb using Rachel Maddow as a source. It is quite clear what you both are trying to do. Please stop using WP to push your political view. Arzel (talk) 17:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
So an official House Budget Committee report is not notable?
http://budget.house.gov/waronpoverty/
- This statement is not notable. It's just a POV attack on Ryan. It definitely does not belong in his WP:BLP.CFredkin (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- The fix it, don't delete it! There are numerous sources that describe his plan, and many of them are critical and should be reported. As I can see that it seems no one is interested in fixing it, I will. Cwobeel (talk) 00:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- It was not that hard. Cwobeel (talk) 01:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)