→BLP violation?: ping |
Gandydancer (talk | contribs) →BLP violation?: cmt |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
:* [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]], I'm sorry I forgot to ping you. Please restore that content. -- [[User:BullRangifer|BullRangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 20:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC) |
:* [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]], I'm sorry I forgot to ping you. Please restore that content. -- [[User:BullRangifer|BullRangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 20:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
:::Oh pull-esse, let's drop the bullshit "I',m so sorry I forgot to ping you." As a matter of fact I do not go around deleting long-standing Trump-related stuff without fully expecting immediate feedback--as has happened here. I would have thought you would be aware of that, but apparently not. The thing is, I don't doubt the truth of the information, I just feel that it needs better sourcing. This is, after all, a BLP. [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 22:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Can someone put in a section on Melania Trump and racist birther comments? == |
== Can someone put in a section on Melania Trump and racist birther comments? == |
Revision as of 22:43, 17 November 2018
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Template:Friendly search suggestions
Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2018
Add wiki links to germanized 158.182.178.168 (talk) 03:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Firing staff
Can someone add in a section comparing Melania Trump's involvement in the firing of White House Staff. How does this compare to previous First Ladies, Nancy Reagan, and Democratic First Ladies? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.32.138 (talk) 10:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Yugoslav spat - Mira Ricardel
Can someone add in a section on the recent Yugoslav spat at the White House?
Lots of gossip about Mira Ricardel.
Is it a question of Croatia versus Slovenia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.32.138 (talk) 10:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
New page controller
Can Wiklipedia set up a new page, that is independently controlled?
This page is probably controlled by supporter of Melania Knavs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.32.138 (talk) 10:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
BLP violation?
Article says, "She did 10 paid modeling jobs in the U.S. in the seven weeks before she received legal permission to work in the country.[6]" Only one source is given for this, & that from Main Stream Media. And since there is such antagonism between Trump & the MSM, IMHO a claim that Melania broke the law modeling requires strong proof, including sources which are sympathetic to the Trumps. (PeacePeace (talk) 07:04, 15 November 2018 (UTC))
- I agree that we need more than an AP investigation to include this info in a BLP. I've moved it to talk while we discuss it.
- She did 10 paid modeling jobs in the U.S. in the seven weeks before she received legal permission to work in the country.[1]
- Gandydancer (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- No, we do not need sources sympathetic to the Trumps. We need reliable sources. This was reported by some of the most reputable sources, such as The Washington Post. Also - guess what? "Mainstream media" usually counts as reliable sources. The question is - has this claim been denied by the Trumps or a reliable source? Surtsicna (talk) 16:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with Surtsicna. This is a non-controversial claim backed by numerous RS, with the AP being one of the most reliable. We could easily add many more sources, with their commentary about the hypocrisy about this, but the AP source is good enough, and the content should be restored. If not, then we can restore it in a beefed-up version, with more sources and with commentary showing why it's very relevant, and I can guarantee that version would be even more bullet proof, and also much more negative. This version states the facts in a very neutral fashion and is good. If the content is not reverted very quickly, a better and more negative version is going in, and I see no need for that. Let's do the right thing and drop the political protectionism and overblown BLP sensitivity excuse. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 19:16, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Gandydancer, I'm sorry I forgot to ping you. Please restore that content. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 20:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oh pull-esse, let's drop the bullshit "I',m so sorry I forgot to ping you." As a matter of fact I do not go around deleting long-standing Trump-related stuff without fully expecting immediate feedback--as has happened here. I would have thought you would be aware of that, but apparently not. The thing is, I don't doubt the truth of the information, I just feel that it needs better sourcing. This is, after all, a BLP. Gandydancer (talk) 22:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Can someone put in a section on Melania Trump and racist birther comments?
Can someone put in a section on Melania Trump and racist birther comments? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.32.138 (talk) 14:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)