Content deleted Content added
71.82.112.140 (talk) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::::I did not claim ownership of the article (nor did I ''[[WP:EW|undo]]'' your edits twice). Please answer my question. Did you remove all of the [[Damu Ridas]] names where each name listed here was mentioned in that article? [[Special:Contributions/71.82.112.140|71.82.112.140]] ([[User talk:71.82.112.140|talk]]) 22:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
::::I did not claim ownership of the article (nor did I ''[[WP:EW|undo]]'' your edits twice). Please answer my question. Did you remove all of the [[Damu Ridas]] names where each name listed here was mentioned in that article? [[Special:Contributions/71.82.112.140|71.82.112.140]] ([[User talk:71.82.112.140|talk]]) 22:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::::If you ''actually looked'' at the revisions that I made instead of blindly reverting it, you could have answered that question yourself. But to answer it: No, I did not remove them. And you did undo my edits twice: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deceased_hip_hop_artists&diff=614273666&oldid=614269368] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deceased_hip_hop_artists&diff=614421997&oldid=614409545] -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 22:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
:::::If you ''actually looked'' at the revisions that I made instead of blindly reverting it, you could have answered that question yourself. But to answer it: No, I did not remove them. And you did undo my edits twice: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deceased_hip_hop_artists&diff=614273666&oldid=614269368] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deceased_hip_hop_artists&diff=614421997&oldid=614409545] -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 22:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
::::::You have been reported for making controversial edits, false claims, and removing sourced information. You are welcome to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Reporting_user|discussion]] at any time. This incident has gone too far because of your blatant, controversial edits backed by vague statements. Restoring information should not count as an undo. [[Special:Contributions/71.82.112.140|71.82.112.140]] ([[User talk:71.82.112.140|talk]]) 22:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:21, 25 June 2014
Death List‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Hip hop Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Trimming and cleaning of list
Per comments brought up in the AfD, I have once again attempted to clean up the list. I have removed entries because of the following reasons:
- Unlinked, non-notable entries per WP:NLIST.
- Linked artists where the linked article is not the artist's article, but is instead their record company, group, or other artist where the linked artist is not mentioned in the article.
- Most of the names you removed all at once appear to be linked and/or sourced, but some are clearly lacking in coverage and not linked. I think you definitely removed way too much at once without explaining why and you should be much more specific. Thanks for citing non-notable and WP:NLIST because I wasn't necessarily aware of those policies used on Wikipedia to define notability on an article. However, I believe some of the names you have again removed may merit notability on this article per linkage (see below) and/or WP:MUSIC SOURCES (see revision history). 71.82.112.140 (talk) 21:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
If an article is created for one of the deleted entries, then they can be re-added at that point. Entries should not be listed because they may be linked at one point. Essentially write the article first, then add the link.
I also fixed the random order of the list by making the default sort order the name. I sorted it by hand, so mistakes may have been made with the order. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- In regards to random order, the article should be listed by year, preferably in subsections. In regards to wikilinks, unlinked does not necessarily define non-notability in an article (please note revision history). As requested in revision history, please discuss specific names here. Did you remove all of the Damu Ridas names where each name listed here was mentioned in that article? 71.82.112.140 (talk) 21:40, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Since you completely undid my edits twice, it is becoming more obvious to me that you have ownership issues with this article and it is time for a third opinion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- I did not claim ownership of the article (nor did I undo your edits twice). Please answer my question. Did you remove all of the Damu Ridas names where each name listed here was mentioned in that article? 71.82.112.140 (talk) 22:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- If you actually looked at the revisions that I made instead of blindly reverting it, you could have answered that question yourself. But to answer it: No, I did not remove them. And you did undo my edits twice: [1] [2] -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- You have been reported for making controversial edits, false claims, and removing sourced information. You are welcome to participate in the discussion at any time. This incident has gone too far because of your blatant, controversial edits backed by vague statements. Restoring information should not count as an undo. 71.82.112.140 (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- If you actually looked at the revisions that I made instead of blindly reverting it, you could have answered that question yourself. But to answer it: No, I did not remove them. And you did undo my edits twice: [1] [2] -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- I did not claim ownership of the article (nor did I undo your edits twice). Please answer my question. Did you remove all of the Damu Ridas names where each name listed here was mentioned in that article? 71.82.112.140 (talk) 22:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Since you completely undid my edits twice, it is becoming more obvious to me that you have ownership issues with this article and it is time for a third opinion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)